bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
shamona
- 07 Oct 2005 21:00
- 10833 of 27111
Masterson
Why not just post the link to your useless research?
It would save the hassle of skimming past it and would save Moneyam webspace.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:06
- 10834 of 27111
sham
Read what I said again.
"Any of you with any intelligence will look at what PM posts and make your own minds up as to what is relevant and what is not. If it wasn't for PM a lot of people would not have a clue as to the ins and outs of SEO. "
Now what part of the above is complicated for you. I dont care about BES or any other thread. This discussion board is for SEO. Sham SEO means Stanelco. Hope you are following so far, if not I will go slower for you.
With all the posts that you have posted I have not seen one intelligent one, its short this short that, its going down. Currently you will be receiving rounds of applause from the other single cell brains on here that cant give any particular reason as to why the share price is going down currently. Look at the fundamentals of the company, great management, great products, its going places.
Sham if you were intelligent you would have discovered SEO when the price was less than 4p, you would have received dividends, you would have had the advantage of the first rights issue at 3p.
Hope you get the point !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oilywag
- 07 Oct 2005 21:07
- 10835 of 27111
OK now listen up and lets get this clear.
I appreciate what PM does in terms of research which is exhaustive. Where he gets the energy, time, motivation, etc I do not know.
I am as enthusiastic and hopeful as anyone on this board about the future potential of SEO.
All I and others on here want is to get a little more clear perspective as to what SEO is all about.
When anyone raises a query or questions someone else's opinion of perhaps a stated "fact" most are doing so in the spirit wanting to learn and be educated to theirs and others benefit. These queries should not automatically be taken as a personal attack on the person being questioned, asked for justification or supporting evidence.
Clear perspective only comes from moderated, reasoned, balanced and accurate information and not people implying that they are privy to "inside" facts and by that getting others to believe that what they say is gospel.
The less experienced readers of the board are consequently more likely to follow blindly like sheep suffering the resulting financial loss. I know, Ive been there during the techno boom of the late 90's.
So please, choose your words carefully and weigh the impact of them on others.
The oily one
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:09
- 10836 of 27111
Oily / Dog
Totally agree with you.
Unknown
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:11
- 10837 of 27111
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:15
- 10838 of 27111
here's an easy answer to all this. pm1, stop posting so much shit and, as you said, talk about seo. we have already figured out that high oil prices are good for seo, we don't need the same point constantly repeated. also, stop making crass statements hinting that you are privy to inside information. it only leaves you open to accusations of being full of shit. as to the question of whether you are right or not, all i know is that you have consistently told everyone all is well and the sp is going to rise, but , instead the sp has fallen nearly 50% since you started posting on mam. that is not to say you are to blame. any bb poster who thinks he can influence the share price is surely deluded. your record so far isn't good. infact, since you came to mam it is the people you have squelched who have been correct in predicting the current price trend.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:15
- 10839 of 27111
Paul
Did you E-Mail SEO about Starpol 2000 and ASTM standards, if so, did you get a reply ?
BN
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:17
- 10840 of 27111
Brandname Hi,
ROTFLMAO !!!!
Cheers,
PM
qc
- 07 Oct 2005 21:19
- 10841 of 27111
Totally agree Oily and feel that the question Oblo asked was one that anyone else on here could have reasonably asked after the originally quote and as such should have recieved a decent response.
TheFrenchConnection
- 07 Oct 2005 21:20
- 10842 of 27111
Amities ? Slt shamona ....My sentiments exactly. But i reiterate your wasting your time and effort . You wont get an answer . What amazes me is l simply cant begin to comprehend how this simpleton seems to deceive folk with such consumate ease. l can read him like a cheap magazine . Even my g/f who has nothing to do with the city nor its nefarious antics describes him as evasive , defensive and would be utterly redundant without that bloody google search . Where was he when SEO were 3p when Bos bought or at 4.75 when i entered the fray ? .l will tell you . Attempting to ramp SEO on another thread until he was removed . ....And where is he now ? Posting the same nonsense so repetively on this thread. Please give us all a break . We are not all as green nor naive fools as you seem to so arrogantly assume .....@+ J.
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:20
- 10843 of 27111
Brandname Hi,
25 September 2005
Dear Howard,
Another shareholder has suggested that Biotec obtain the 'ASTM - D6400-04 Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics', the shareholder said "I think the ASTM only refers to Carrier bags at present and only in the state of California. However my concern is that they pass similar stature in USA for Food packaging materials, therefore may be prudent for SEO / Biotec to obtain ASTM approval on Starpol 2000. i.e. beating the legislation in the USA before it appears"
http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/REDLINE_PAGES/D6400.htm?L+mystore+taqw8859+1127689110
It sounds like a good idea to me, another bit of good advertising too I guess, depends if it costs much I suppose !
Kind regards,
Paul
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:20
- 10844 of 27111
BOS
The shorters have been right for a small part of the year so far. Yes if we had all been sensible and clever we would have sold at the top of this share and bought back in at the bottom. But guess what some of us didn't. The shorters / bashers are having there 5 minutes of glory, so let them. If the shorters were so clever they wouldn't waste their time posting gloating about it. Its only the wannabees that goad.
Nothing has changed as far as SEO goes, dynamic company tons of potential. What other company has so many diverse oppurtunites, not many that I can see around at the moment. The patience will pay off in the long run.
TheFrenchConnection
- 07 Oct 2005 21:24
- 10845 of 27111
and then you woke up i presume lol
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:24
- 10846 of 27111
Brandname Hi,
ROTFLMAO !!!!
Cheers,
PM
ROTFLMAO is raw nerves to me, why'd you say that
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:25
- 10847 of 27111
QC Hi,
How could I possibly have answered the question ?
That's the point of Oblomov questions, it's just a way of putting me in a difficult position, I had all this on FYB, before the admin team told Oblomov to quit with the endless repetetive postings of the same question, they also asked me not to be drawn into arguing about it, so like I have done here today, I have given my last reply to Oblomov on the subject.
Cheers,
PM
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:26
- 10848 of 27111
pm1, you put yourself into this "difficult" position.
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:26
- 10849 of 27111
Brandname Hi,
I was laughing at your post directed at the sham .... immensely funny :))))
Cheers,
PM
TheFrenchConnection
- 07 Oct 2005 21:28
- 10850 of 27111
Agggghhhh Your sheer gaul is equalled only by your narcissm. l could take an extreme dislike to you without an iota of effort ..@+ J
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:29
- 10851 of 27111
Bosley Hi,
No I didn't, because anyone else would have asked me to explain my posts in a different way, rather than imply by question, that I either had inside info, or was lying, when the truth is that there are millions of other explanations that could explain my posts, Oblomov as has always done, goes straight for the two reasons he can pick, in order to defamate my character.
Cheers,
PM
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:31
- 10852 of 27111
Night all,
Had enough of this saga for one night ....
PM