for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

A 'must have' from IBAW ....

http://www.ibaw.org/eng/downloads/IBAW_Pressmaterial.pdf

here's an easy answer to all this. pm1, stop posting so much shit and, as you said, talk about seo. we have already figured out that high oil prices are good for seo, we don't need the same point constantly repeated. also, stop making crass statements hinting that you are privy to inside information. it only leaves you open to accusations of being full of shit. as to the question of whether you are right or not, all i know is that you have consistently told everyone all is well and the sp is going to rise, but , instead the sp has fallen nearly 50% since you started posting on mam. that is not to say you are to blame. any bb poster who thinks he can influence the share price is surely deluded. your record so far isn't good. infact, since you came to mam it is the people you have squelched who have been correct in predicting the current price trend.

Paul

Did you E-Mail SEO about Starpol 2000 and ASTM standards, if so, did you get a reply ?

BN

Brandname Hi,

ROTFLMAO !!!!

Cheers,
PM

Totally agree Oily and feel that the question Oblo asked was one that anyone else on here could have reasonably asked after the originally quote and as such should have recieved a decent response.

Amities ? Slt shamona ....My sentiments exactly. But i reiterate your wasting your time and effort . You wont get an answer . What amazes me is l simply cant begin to comprehend how this simpleton seems to deceive folk with such consumate ease. l can read him like a cheap magazine . Even my g/f who has nothing to do with the city nor its nefarious antics describes him as evasive , defensive and would be utterly redundant without that bloody google search . Where was he when SEO were 3p when Bos bought or at 4.75 when i entered the fray ? .l will tell you . Attempting to ramp SEO on another thread until he was removed . ....And where is he now ? Posting the same nonsense so repetively on this thread. Please give us all a break . We are not all as green nor naive fools as you seem to so arrogantly assume .....@+ J.

Brandname Hi,

25 September 2005

Dear Howard,

Another shareholder has suggested that Biotec obtain the 'ASTM - D6400-04 Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics', the shareholder said "I think the ASTM only refers to Carrier bags at present and only in the state of California. However my concern is that they pass similar stature in USA for Food packaging materials, therefore may be prudent for SEO / Biotec to obtain ASTM approval on Starpol 2000. i.e. beating the legislation in the USA before it appears"

http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/REDLINE_PAGES/D6400.htm?L+mystore+taqw8859+1127689110


It sounds like a good idea to me, another bit of good advertising too I guess, depends if it costs much I suppose !

Kind regards,
Paul

BOS

The shorters have been right for a small part of the year so far. Yes if we had all been sensible and clever we would have sold at the top of this share and bought back in at the bottom. But guess what some of us didn't. The shorters / bashers are having there 5 minutes of glory, so let them. If the shorters were so clever they wouldn't waste their time posting gloating about it. Its only the wannabees that goad.

Nothing has changed as far as SEO goes, dynamic company tons of potential. What other company has so many diverse oppurtunites, not many that I can see around at the moment. The patience will pay off in the long run.

and then you woke up i presume lol

Brandname Hi,

ROTFLMAO !!!!

Cheers,
PM

ROTFLMAO is raw nerves to me, why'd you say that

QC Hi,

How could I possibly have answered the question ?

That's the point of Oblomov questions, it's just a way of putting me in a difficult position, I had all this on FYB, before the admin team told Oblomov to quit with the endless repetetive postings of the same question, they also asked me not to be drawn into arguing about it, so like I have done here today, I have given my last reply to Oblomov on the subject.

Cheers,
PM

pm1, you put yourself into this "difficult" position.

Brandname Hi,

I was laughing at your post directed at the sham .... immensely funny :))))

Cheers,
PM

Agggghhhh Your sheer gaul is equalled only by your narcissm. l could take an extreme dislike to you without an iota of effort ..@+ J

Bosley Hi,

No I didn't, because anyone else would have asked me to explain my posts in a different way, rather than imply by question, that I either had inside info, or was lying, when the truth is that there are millions of other explanations that could explain my posts, Oblomov as has always done, goes straight for the two reasons he can pick, in order to defamate my character.

Cheers,
PM

Night all,

Had enough of this saga for one night ....

PM

this is oblomov's post.

"Paul, you haven't answered my question from above - here it is again:-

Paul wrote:-

'If you think the last few RNS's were impressive, wait until you see the next few :)'



do you have some specific knowledge of what will be in 'the next few' (if you do I'm not expecting you to divulge the information here)? "


please give just a few of the millions of other explanations.

PM

OK just that some one who I totally detest on iii, uses that all the time

brandname, would that be seq by any chance? or oldolie , as you probably know him.

Bos

Olieold.