bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:26
- 10848 of 27111
pm1, you put yourself into this "difficult" position.
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:26
- 10849 of 27111
Brandname Hi,
I was laughing at your post directed at the sham .... immensely funny :))))
Cheers,
PM
TheFrenchConnection
- 07 Oct 2005 21:28
- 10850 of 27111
Agggghhhh Your sheer gaul is equalled only by your narcissm. l could take an extreme dislike to you without an iota of effort ..@+ J
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:29
- 10851 of 27111
Bosley Hi,
No I didn't, because anyone else would have asked me to explain my posts in a different way, rather than imply by question, that I either had inside info, or was lying, when the truth is that there are millions of other explanations that could explain my posts, Oblomov as has always done, goes straight for the two reasons he can pick, in order to defamate my character.
Cheers,
PM
paulmasterson1
- 07 Oct 2005 21:31
- 10852 of 27111
Night all,
Had enough of this saga for one night ....
PM
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:35
- 10853 of 27111
this is oblomov's post.
"Paul, you haven't answered my question from above - here it is again:-
Paul wrote:-
'If you think the last few RNS's were impressive, wait until you see the next few :)'
do you have some specific knowledge of what will be in 'the next few' (if you do I'm not expecting you to divulge the information here)? "
please give just a few of the millions of other explanations.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:36
- 10854 of 27111
PM
OK just that some one who I totally detest on iii, uses that all the time
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:38
- 10855 of 27111
brandname, would that be seq by any chance? or oldolie , as you probably know him.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:41
- 10856 of 27111
Bos
Olieold.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:42
- 10857 of 27111
Bos
Whos seq, not familiar with that one
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:51
- 10858 of 27111
sequestor, is how we know him. we all got off on the wrong foot, but it soon resolved once he realised the regulars weren't rampers and we realised he doesn't care about seo , just which direction it may go next. it seems he has had a similar effect on iii. he talked a lot of sense here. in retrospect, i should have listened and made a lot more money on my cfds instead of losing it.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:53
- 10859 of 27111
So what u r saying is sequestor on here and Olieold are same people ?
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 21:54
- 10860 of 27111
yep.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:55
- 10861 of 27111
Bos
If so then, I feel sorry for you, all olieold is calls the market down, A total basher. Hes right in the current times but not overall. I have Olieold down as Belabed from ADVFN as he posts the same and appeared on iii same time Belabed was banned from ADVFN.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 21:57
- 10862 of 27111
Also uses several differnt names, usual basher handbook stuff, if the market looks likes its going up, changes his mind etc etc.
Junior ii in my opinion.
bosley
- 07 Oct 2005 22:05
- 10863 of 27111
fair enough. as i said earlier, though, he doesn't care about seo , just its next direction.
Brandname
- 07 Oct 2005 22:06
- 10864 of 27111
So hows he gain out that ?
greekman
- 07 Oct 2005 22:16
- 10865 of 27111
So PM1 said, 'If you think the last few RNS's were impressive, wait until you see the next few : Why does that infer he has access to info. Perhaps he should not have stated it as such, but I for one ( no doubt there are many ) who do expect further RNS releases, and if you expect an announcement re Walmart then yes wait till you see the next few days,( possibly read months ). It did not come over to me as a fact, just a light hearted conjecture of the future. If you are not expecting further news that will be more impresive then you should not be holding onto this share and should have already taken a profit.
TheFrenchConnection
- 07 Oct 2005 22:16
- 10866 of 27111
Amities PM1... ll ne s'ameliore pas !!!! Mefiez-vous des apparences. A' ta place -Un bon conseil ,,,,Go to golfingers talk to yourself thread ! You said it mon pote. You said it . We are all fed up with a saga of YOUR making ...... l sit and ponder at how many poor wretches retained a position with SEO when it was 30p; and you were bleating that 50p was on the horizon according to your so called anonomous so well informed and connected sources . Yes - l rememeber it well . All of us who sold at 27+ were morons according to you . lf i remember correctly it was at much the same time l politely enquirred as to your status/interest in SEO what with your personal website and considering every second post was from you .And in reply to such an innocous innocent question you not only AVOIDED my question but answered in a volley of obscene language and finished your tirade by saying i should be exterminated . { ln your dreams shit for brains) lrony being that volumes were low and the chart could not support nor even justify 1op let alone 24p and simply because i suggested people should sell and buy in cheaper later on l was in the minority then and merely shouted down as some harpinger of doom . Well from where im sitting buddy 27p is a slight improvement on 14.75 ...lm FAR from gloating; merely reflecting on your ineptitude.......Do you at least conceed that much ? Or are you juste plainly mad. Your a dangerous man to try and play with others monies . Stick to your daytime job . A zealot ; hence destined for what is invincible defeat.. Your postings are dogmatic to the point of making a mockery out of applied economics Your source ? > Who was that ? The sandwich maker in your canteen at Southampton Council ....? . Ok Ok i wont sayanother word about the man . @+ J
zscrooge
- 07 Oct 2005 22:23
- 10867 of 27111
Andysmith - nothing personal -how could it be on a bb? LOL. In fact, thought your posts a while ago re the idea that you pays yer money and takes yer choice (ie fundamentals dodgy yes but blue sky potential ) seemed a sensible judgement. And I know that II et al were bashing but anyone who vaguely questioned the fundamentals (which was my position) was jumped on with aggressive retorts about investors stick it out, odds of success, etc etc. Selling at the top to protect yourself was wise (and nicely done if you were in so early). But essentially, when the optimists were so bullish the fundamentals didn't support it. And now perhaps the derampers are overstating it. Herd mentality. And as an observer who never owned this particular share (I am a fascinated observer on this bb of group psychology and political manoeuvering) what is worse than Pms infantile googling is apparent sensible posters who offered seemingly carefully argued reasons for positivity when the sp was in the 20s only to inform sometime later that they have no holding and then patronise holders.
Bosley, Frenchie seem sensible to me. I only trust 2 other posters on mam. And they aint anywhere near this share.