for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

brandname, would that be seq by any chance? or oldolie , as you probably know him.

Bos

Olieold.

Bos

Whos seq, not familiar with that one

sequestor, is how we know him. we all got off on the wrong foot, but it soon resolved once he realised the regulars weren't rampers and we realised he doesn't care about seo , just which direction it may go next. it seems he has had a similar effect on iii. he talked a lot of sense here. in retrospect, i should have listened and made a lot more money on my cfds instead of losing it.

So what u r saying is sequestor on here and Olieold are same people ?

yep.

Bos

If so then, I feel sorry for you, all olieold is calls the market down, A total basher. Hes right in the current times but not overall. I have Olieold down as Belabed from ADVFN as he posts the same and appeared on iii same time Belabed was banned from ADVFN.

Also uses several differnt names, usual basher handbook stuff, if the market looks likes its going up, changes his mind etc etc.

Junior ii in my opinion.

fair enough. as i said earlier, though, he doesn't care about seo , just its next direction.

So hows he gain out that ?

So PM1 said, 'If you think the last few RNS's were impressive, wait until you see the next few : Why does that infer he has access to info. Perhaps he should not have stated it as such, but I for one ( no doubt there are many ) who do expect further RNS releases, and if you expect an announcement re Walmart then yes wait till you see the next few days,( possibly read months ). It did not come over to me as a fact, just a light hearted conjecture of the future. If you are not expecting further news that will be more impresive then you should not be holding onto this share and should have already taken a profit.

Amities PM1... ll ne s'ameliore pas !!!! Mefiez-vous des apparences. A' ta place -Un bon conseil ,,,,Go to golfingers talk to yourself thread ! You said it mon pote. You said it . We are all fed up with a saga of YOUR making ...... l sit and ponder at how many poor wretches retained a position with SEO when it was 30p; and you were bleating that 50p was on the horizon according to your so called anonomous so well informed and connected sources . Yes - l rememeber it well . All of us who sold at 27+ were morons according to you . lf i remember correctly it was at much the same time l politely enquirred as to your status/interest in SEO what with your personal website and considering every second post was from you .And in reply to such an innocous innocent question you not only AVOIDED my question but answered in a volley of obscene language and finished your tirade by saying i should be exterminated . { ln your dreams shit for brains) lrony being that volumes were low and the chart could not support nor even justify 1op let alone 24p and simply because i suggested people should sell and buy in cheaper later on l was in the minority then and merely shouted down as some harpinger of doom . Well from where im sitting buddy 27p is a slight improvement on 14.75 ...lm FAR from gloating; merely reflecting on your ineptitude.......Do you at least conceed that much ? Or are you juste plainly mad. Your a dangerous man to try and play with others monies . Stick to your daytime job . A zealot ; hence destined for what is invincible defeat.. Your postings are dogmatic to the point of making a mockery out of applied economics Your source ? > Who was that ? The sandwich maker in your canteen at Southampton Council ....? . Ok Ok i wont sayanother word about the man . @+ J

Andysmith - nothing personal -how could it be on a bb? LOL. In fact, thought your posts a while ago re the idea that you pays yer money and takes yer choice (ie fundamentals dodgy yes but blue sky potential ) seemed a sensible judgement. And I know that II et al were bashing but anyone who vaguely questioned the fundamentals (which was my position) was jumped on with aggressive retorts about investors stick it out, odds of success, etc etc. Selling at the top to protect yourself was wise (and nicely done if you were in so early). But essentially, when the optimists were so bullish the fundamentals didn't support it. And now perhaps the derampers are overstating it. Herd mentality. And as an observer who never owned this particular share (I am a fascinated observer on this bb of group psychology and political manoeuvering) what is worse than Pms infantile googling is apparent sensible posters who offered seemingly carefully argued reasons for positivity when the sp was in the 20s only to inform sometime later that they have no holding and then patronise holders.

Bosley, Frenchie seem sensible to me. I only trust 2 other posters on mam. And they aint anywhere near this share.

Do any us really give a jot about SEO ? Be honest with at least yourselves . l dont . l care about SEO as much as i care whether it rains while im asleep in bed .... i All i care about is the monies i can extract from trading it. Sentimentalism is one thing: but watching profit rapidly vanishing down the lavatory is absurd . Be honest Bos : lf you could perhaps change / modify any fiscal decisions you have made with SEO l suspect that top of your agenda would have been to take 27-30p only to return another day . a'bientot .....Right im off out ......Amusez-vous bien Bonne nuit @+ J

Do any us really give a jot about SEO ? Be honest with at least yourselves . l dont . l care about SEO as much as i care whether it rains while im asleep in bed .... i All i care about is the monies i can extract from trading it. Sentimentalism is one thing: but watching profit rapidly vanishing down the lavatory is absurd . Be honest Bos : lf you could perhaps change / modify any fiscal decisions you have made with SEO l suspect that top of your agenda would have been to take 27-30p only to return another day . a'bientot .....Right im off out ......Amusez-vous bien Bonne nuit @+ J

brandname, look at the chart and imagine calling all the peaks and troughs correctly , going long and short. that's all he tries to do.
greekman, i would agree if this was the first time pm1 has hinted at inside information.
tfc, it certainly isn't improving. care about seo??... no . believe that it has potential?... yes. and yes, i do wish i had sold at 30p.
zscrooge, thanks ...but you're only saying that 'cos i might be living down the road from you!!

LOL! Wine kicking in, must get to bed.

PM, this is not a go at you but merely to answer greekman.

Mock all you like about RNS's, or even imply I might have been guessing, but these words are from an E-Mail to me 4 weeks ago ....

"I hope that in the next few weeks we will be able to enlighten the market on just how good Biotec is, and how many gems exist in it."

THIS is why PM has been questioned tonight.....

Paul, I am not attacking you personally - just seeking the answer to a perfectly reasonable question put in a reasonable manner.

You say:-

'Oblomov Hi,

Your again going to annoy everyone here as you did on FYB'

Many of the posters here over the past few hours are the same posters who post and read FYB. I dont believe I annoyed them on FYB and trust I am not annoying them here. If I am mistaken, would they please speak up and I'll stop posting .

I think the only person I've annoyed is you, because you cant bear to be questioned.

When the price is rising you are a hero PM1

When the price is sliding you are to blame.

You have not changed your stance or style throughout and I ask that you do not. I value your research and analysis. I judge not your personality, age, sex, morals or character etc.

Any investment decisions and consequences are my own. I made them and I'm very very happy.

Thank you for providing such regular wide ranging information. DO NOT STOP just because of a few bashers, baiters and dissapointed investors/traders.