bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Snip
- 11 Oct 2005 08:04
- 11033 of 27111
someone selling lots of stock in tranches
pisces
- 11 Oct 2005 08:24
- 11034 of 27111
Who said 30p by xmas,more likely to be 5p at this rate.Until the stock overhang has gone this is going to keep plummeting.No orders no recovery.
shamona
- 11 Oct 2005 08:29
- 11035 of 27111
Come on masterson get ramping!
My trade is now down an horrendous amount after swallowing the rns before trade show pluff, at least i'm making plenty in BPRG to cover it but do really wonder about the scruples of some on here.
oblomov
- 11 Oct 2005 08:32
- 11036 of 27111
In these troubled times, just remember that STANELCO is an anagram of CANT LOSE.
Spooky or what?
lol
Oilywag
- 11 Oct 2005 08:37
- 11037 of 27111
Oblomov
Maybe the name of the company ought to be Sanelco?
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 11 Oct 2005 08:38
- 11038 of 27111
Cant loe????
hewittalan6
- 11 Oct 2005 08:38
- 11039 of 27111
Bugger. You edited it before I could make that incisive observation!!!!
LOL
Oilywag
- 11 Oct 2005 08:39
- 11040 of 27111
Hewittalan6
Check the amended post
The oily one
Snip
- 11 Oct 2005 08:43
- 11041 of 27111
anyone who is feeling angry and is wanting to blame somebody. Don`t go down that path. You should all be responsible for making your own decisions. If you have lost pots of money then perhaps you should be reviewing your own investing/trading strategy and perhaps go on a course. Learn not to be a sheep!!!
Oilywag
- 11 Oct 2005 08:44
- 11042 of 27111
If somebody had said to me that the volume of shares traded would be around 6m before 9am and then asked what I expected the majority of transactions to be, I would have definitely said BUYS
Funny old world isn't it?
Still holding for the big news.
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 11 Oct 2005 09:02
- 11043 of 27111
Yep, it's a funny old world all right. Fundamentally, this is the same SEO that was a sure fire buy at 20pps+, and was the subject of a 50pps party in the near future. If anything at all has changed, it is only for the good as SEO have gone to great lengths to show that it's line up is not just packaging in the UK, but many other products, with world wide potential.
The one thing that has definitely changed is traders realisations that products like this, and the contracts they can win, do not happen in the space of a couple of months. They take time and planning, and a market can forgive anything except a slow take up of an idea.
IMHO, the targets we have all set for the company will be achieved, but the timescales are now more realistic. If your target was to trouser it big time in the space of a few days, then this was probably the wrong one to pick. Me? I'm here for the long haul and still very confident that all will be well, given the time to develop properly.
Alan
TheFrenchConnection
- 11 Oct 2005 09:07
- 11044 of 27111
Amities .......".Dr ! Dr ! We have a reading of 12-50 / 13.00 with massive complications. "50mg of adrenalin please nurse" ,,,,and 10mg of valium for its family ......... @+
shamona
- 11 Oct 2005 09:08
- 11045 of 27111
Well the White clan will be down about 5 million quid on paper today, don't be surprised to see an rns to back up the sp.
TheFrenchConnection
- 11 Oct 2005 09:16
- 11046 of 27111
My sentiments exactly shamona .......but will it indeed back the s/p ? Juste like some of the others didnt . @+ .......Rampers strangely tacit ,,,,,lol Wonder why ? @+ J
bosley
- 11 Oct 2005 09:29
- 11047 of 27111
tfc, people are losing money, hope you are not lol-ing at them?
Sharesure
- 11 Oct 2005 09:41
- 11048 of 27111
Watching paper profits vanish along with real losses too isn't a nice experience. Perhaps next time this rises, as I think it is certain to do when the notifiable orders start coming through, then it might rise with genuine long term holders buying in for a 2-3 year view. This has always been a prospect with big medium term potential. I'm tempted to load up even more because as others have said on here nothing has changed other than the news flow has become more erratic and less frequent.
I'm still awaiting responses to questions I put to the company a few weeks ago; being charitable I put that down to them being busy on getting orders. Hope that that is right!
KingKonggb
- 11 Oct 2005 09:49
- 11049 of 27111
Now this might be a daft question, but the volume is considerably larger than normal, so is the sell off a ploy by the mm's to get more shares and knowingly waiting for the big order?
IMHO
Kong
TheFrenchConnection
- 11 Oct 2005 09:51
- 11050 of 27111
Amities Bos / l neither find it funny nor excusable to laugh at other misfortunes. lf that was the impression given i apologise without reservation . l was merely poking fun at that ramper PM1 who recently stated i should be " exterminated " simply becuase i did not share his bullishness. A joke is a joke but im not taking that from ANYONE .......@+ J
bosley
- 11 Oct 2005 09:55
- 11051 of 27111
tfc, fair enough.
Bugz
- 11 Oct 2005 10:07
- 11052 of 27111
Paul.
I have been under the impression that the very reason that News has been slow RE: US CONTRACT is due to confusion over whether to move to Greenseal and then move to Starpol at a later date, or whether to jump straight in with Starpol and Greenseal from the start of any future deal.
I thought HW seemed to be leaning to the latter, contrary to your last post.
Of course this might have changed.