for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

shamona, it might be best to leave the cc to a more relevant time, ie, when we are in court or just before, (january?).
the rest of you sad , pathetic people try growing a brain and do your own research instead of waiting for someone else to do it for you.

i read the RHPS article thanks to posters breaking copyright to put it on to a BB strange that according to TB HW would pull his hair out when he stayed silent for the RNS R US machine to not put out a no business reason for the fall RNS stinks to me of something wrong being hidden pull your hair out but not put the RNS spin machine into action does not add up 50SMA through 200SMA is on its way ?

the RHPS article - exposes - the lack of RNS - on the fall

terrible ramping - desperate ramping - that people put - on BB - the UBS Warburg forecast - for a different market - different company SE0 - and make claim - that its the forecast for Stanelco SEO - terrible liars - and rampers - they are

All IMO DYOR !

ii,
Are you so full of your own self importance you don't even read other posts? I have asked you several times to defend your recent actions, and still you ignore me. Am I such an irritant to you, you have me squelched?
Once again, for the record, where did you get that word maximum from, and why do you have knowledge that no one else has regarding Starpol failing the FDA trial?
Do not presume to aim the word liar at anyone else, until you can show that you are not to be included in that category. Your silence on the subject merely strengthens everyones opinion that you are a peddlar in blatent untruths.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. You my friend are at the back of the queue for stone throwing, behind such liars of renown as Stalin and Clinton.
Alan

Just an afterthought. Anyone remember Comical Ali from the Iraq war? You know, the guy who insisted Iraq were massacering the Allies, while US and UK tanks were visible in the Bahgdad background.
Wonder if he has now found employment posting on MAM boards under a pseudonym. Now what name springs to mind?
Alan

ii, someone posted that it was qc who found the ubs warburg forecast. i would guess that he made a genuine mistake rather than outright ramping. also, be careful , because alan is getting biblical on your ass.

REPENT YE SINNERS. THE TIME IS NIGH!!!!

amen.

Although QC made us aware of the Warburg forecast he was replicating what The Share Centre had on their site. See FYB page 317. So if any one are "terrible liars", as ii says, it is The Share Centre.

Oh, and it appears that ii is not above a lie or two himself by inserting the word MAXIMUM that was not in the original he was quoting.

The Share Centre probably made an innocent mistake. Did ii ?
Yes or no, he should retract, apologise and try better in future......

insiderinside, only inside your own living room, that is defamation of character if you are suggesting that QC posted that information in an attempt to ramp the stock or mislead anyone. If you bothered to read the actual post you would see where the information came from and in what context the post was made.

"I may have missed this or is it a mistake? Just having a look at my share account thru www.share.com and wondered if anyone else saw or discussed this when they apparently upgraded SEO. Look at the target prices! Sorry for the table, cant be bothered fixing it!"

Date Broker name New Price Old price target New price target Broker change
12-Oct-05 Teathers Buy 13.50p - - New Coverage
03-Oct-05 UBS Warburg Buy 16.75p 280.00p 330.00p Upgrade

ii is Barry Muncaster in case anyone is interested. He used to post as Poorold, but now also posts as olieold on iii and under several guises ( since removed ), on FYB.

He ought, and I'm sure will eventually, be prosecuted.

Bosley

I find your posts mostly to be arrogant and rude. And often lacking in logic.

Just contribute want is relevant to SEO and leave out the personal stuff please.

I would just like to say, I think that this board has been ruined. Anyone who buys shares will know that there is a certain amount of risk, they don't need help to decide from the likes of Sham and II. quite frankly I take more notice of the professionals like Tom Burford, and his latest note is very reassuring. So all you derampers rampers can carry on playing your games. There is a saying that goes 'If you never take risks you have never lived' . I have had it with this board, because it has become a big joke. Good luck to all SEO Holders. You win some you lose some, but sometimes patience will pay off.

Is Sham ii ??

chippy2 - no

Tonyrelaxes and Alan - i have answered the question already - did you read - and did not quote from the RNS in full - or cut and paste it - it was my opinion and understanding of the RNS - written in my words - stop trying to be so nasty - to poor old ii ;)

as you read RHPS update - and it was about shorting and pulling hair out - then think of this - RNS R US - could easily say - no business reason for the fall - did they ? no - why no ? - is there a business reason - look into it - why - they use the media - and not the official RNS system - to make the - please dont sell SE0 call -

All IMO - DYOR !

" professionals like Tom Burford ", well !!! if he was as good as he thinks he is
he would not be a humble journalist !! The same applies to the FT writer who
thought this company was listed on AIM!!.
I am looking forward to the week ahead , I certainly would not want to be short on this company during the coming week!!

Well, given we that no longer have PM1, bless his cotton socks, I hope that we can make a new objective of balanced posting. I assume PM1 was banned for breach of copyright with regard to the T&G report: distributing it rather than quoting it. That is perhaps a pity as it is an excellent, balanced report and I have already suggested that it should be essential reading for anyone who attempts to post here with any authority. Sham had a copy but I would like him and II in particular to read it and comment on its findings. Most of your comments are a waste of space being respectively under-researched and distorted. I challenge each of you to read it and respond with balanced comments: it should not be beyond ii's wit to obtain a copy.

The report has helped my understanding in the following respects, clearly from dialogure with Stanelco:

(i) other large organisations have assessed the technology (Greenseal) and management believe that they will adopt next year;
(ii) Wal-Mart's commitment to polypropylene makes it a much bigger decision to convert - hence excluded from forecasts (n.b. does not say that they will not adopt but that it will probably not happen quickly and involves factos beyond SEO's control);
(iii) as reported earlier, ASDA commitment is still there for 200 but quarterly progress is likely be more like 5/35/70/50
(iv) there are 30 models of forming machine, each having to be approached individually; initial transfer can take 2 weeks for each type but thereafter should drop to 2 days
(v) for the first time, what seem to be well-researched forecasts for Starpol are given; these appear to justify a cap. for the non-RF products in the range of 50 million.

It seems to me that the ramping inclinations of PM1 have attracted derampers to this thread, probably repeating battles that they have fought elsewhere. Now that he has gone I hope that they will either go away or back off to a more objective position.

Eric

Dormar
Just in case you hadn't noticed this is bosleys (bos) thread so he can say what he likes so can I come to that, so if you don't like it * off.

"Dormar - 16 Oct 2005 13:04 - 11620 of 11625
Bosley

I find your posts mostly to be arrogant and rude. And often lacking in logic.

Just contribute want is relevant to SEO and leave out the personal stuff please. "

dormar, i am insulted by your post!!! only "mostly"? i will try to do better and be completely arrogant and rude. also, could you please exemplify where i am lacking in logic? maybe if i google and find 25 articles all saying the price of oil is going to go up you would think i am contributing something relevant.