Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 18:17
- 122 of 388
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 18:18
- 123 of 388
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=856421
Some more work needed by me
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 18:19
- 124 of 388
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 18:20
- 125 of 388
Some help required I think
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 19:41
- 127 of 388
oK
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=856512
put text in here
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 19:46
- 128 of 388
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 19:47
- 129 of 388
Ta TJ hope I can remember it
D
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 19:55
- 130 of 388
I have the impression that the site is slower than previously .I have an 8M connection and previously it was loaded as I clicked the thread. Perhaps it is only my connection.
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 20:10
- 132 of 388
It is just a general impression ,but it may be totally this end and nothing to do with the site .Will check with Process Explorer and monitor tomorrow.
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 20:52
- 133 of 388
TJ Cleaned the reg seemed to speed the system my end
StonyB
- 04 Jul 2005 23:20
- 134 of 388
Sorry to be a wet blanket but I'm not taking easily to this new format.
The smaller print (or is it just a font change) combined with the squarer buttons looks fussier, harder to read, and somehow less 'open and friendly'.
The colourful little icons are simply unnecessary, and draw the eye away from the main point of interest, which is the poster's name. I think they ought to be relegated to the Profile page for each poster, accessed by clicking on the poster's name, as before. (Do the icons slow down page-scrolling, btw?)
Have to say I also liked the (old) 'Recent Posts' button, rather than this page-centred format. (ie : with the new Page numbers, 1,2,3,4 etc... as the only way, as far as I can see, of jumping immediately to recent posts.)
Jeez, this is the sort of design that (rather frighteningly) I can imagine that I might have come up with as a 'good idea' before I realised the error of my ways.
I leave it at that. End of sermon.
~~~
Re posts #46 & #52 - thanks for the reply JT. Obviously I don't know what the position is in this case but my (programming) experience is that sometimes things like column order may appear to be major changes but in fact are fairly easy to effect, albeit with some fiddly col-width reformatting. I appreciate it's not of immediate concern though.
Re post maggot's post #51, I agree with him that it's useful to have the last post on a page repeated as the first one on the next. Yes, I know the numbers follow in sequence, but that's not how users read. We don't keep a mental note of the number of the post we've just read; we know the content of the post we've just read and like to glance at it as a point of reference, of navigation.
chocolat
- 05 Jul 2005 00:52
- 135 of 388
Here's a silly one - I can't post .29!
edit: now when I try to edit what comes out as .29, even the edit box is telling me I typed .29 - but I didn't. It was supposed to be (dollar sign) 12.29.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:24
- 136 of 388
StonyB,
Thnks for the feedback - I shall pass it onto JT.
Chocolat,
Interesting - is this just happening with dollar signs? I will let JT know,
Ian
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:31
- 138 of 388
Kyoto,
Thanks I will get him to update here when he has looked at it,
Ian