Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 20:10
- 132 of 388
It is just a general impression ,but it may be totally this end and nothing to do with the site .Will check with Process Explorer and monitor tomorrow.
Digger
- 04 Jul 2005 20:52
- 133 of 388
TJ Cleaned the reg seemed to speed the system my end
StonyB
- 04 Jul 2005 23:20
- 134 of 388
Sorry to be a wet blanket but I'm not taking easily to this new format.
The smaller print (or is it just a font change) combined with the squarer buttons looks fussier, harder to read, and somehow less 'open and friendly'.
The colourful little icons are simply unnecessary, and draw the eye away from the main point of interest, which is the poster's name. I think they ought to be relegated to the Profile page for each poster, accessed by clicking on the poster's name, as before. (Do the icons slow down page-scrolling, btw?)
Have to say I also liked the (old) 'Recent Posts' button, rather than this page-centred format. (ie : with the new Page numbers, 1,2,3,4 etc... as the only way, as far as I can see, of jumping immediately to recent posts.)
Jeez, this is the sort of design that (rather frighteningly) I can imagine that I might have come up with as a 'good idea' before I realised the error of my ways.
I leave it at that. End of sermon.
~~~
Re posts #46 & #52 - thanks for the reply JT. Obviously I don't know what the position is in this case but my (programming) experience is that sometimes things like column order may appear to be major changes but in fact are fairly easy to effect, albeit with some fiddly col-width reformatting. I appreciate it's not of immediate concern though.
Re post maggot's post #51, I agree with him that it's useful to have the last post on a page repeated as the first one on the next. Yes, I know the numbers follow in sequence, but that's not how users read. We don't keep a mental note of the number of the post we've just read; we know the content of the post we've just read and like to glance at it as a point of reference, of navigation.
chocolat
- 05 Jul 2005 00:52
- 135 of 388
Here's a silly one - I can't post .29!
edit: now when I try to edit what comes out as .29, even the edit box is telling me I typed .29 - but I didn't. It was supposed to be (dollar sign) 12.29.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:24
- 136 of 388
StonyB,
Thnks for the feedback - I shall pass it onto JT.
Chocolat,
Interesting - is this just happening with dollar signs? I will let JT know,
Ian
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:31
- 138 of 388
Kyoto,
Thanks I will get him to update here when he has looked at it,
Ian
seawallwalker
- 05 Jul 2005 07:48
- 140 of 388
Hi all.
Unless I am missing a control, I wonder if you could include a "go to end" button as before please.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:50
- 141 of 388
seawallwalker,
You will see at the bottom of every thread list towards the right hand side, a series of numbers - if you click on the last number this will take you to the end of the trhead,
Ian
Kyoto
- 05 Jul 2005 07:53
- 142 of 388
StonyB - have to agree with you on the subject of the icons. Their colourful nature and large size and proximity relative to the poster's name seems to serve to detract attention away from it - and the post below. I thought I'd get used to it (subconsciously start editing them out visually) after a few days, but it isn't happening. I don't think I'll ever like them.
Clickable functionality ought to be sized, spaced and visually presented relative to frequency of use. Since the icon options are probably not going to be used so much I think they should be more discrete. Ironically the edit button, which surely would be more frequently used, is much more visually understated. The page navigation buttons are smaller than the profile icons and quite close together, yet these are really important. I find myself having to 'aim' my mouse more carefully than I did before.
A good example of icons that work are the ones in the MoneyAM Terminal. Relatively small, colour consistent (so it doesn't feel like a child's paintbox), understated and dare I say, a bit classier?
I hate saying all this because having spent a lot of my life working in and studying software development, with heavy doses of 'interface functionality engineering', I know you usually don't please most of the people most of the time, and coming up with an interface you like and having people tell you it doesn't work for them is a bit depressing. Actually, software development is an increasingly thankless task which is why I got out of it - and why I really sympathise with what the MoneyAM team are going through.
But I still find the new design vaguely irritating. Sorry folks!
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 07:55
- 143 of 388
Kyoto,
Thanks for the feedback I will pass it onto JT,
Ian
seawallwalker
- 05 Jul 2005 08:01
- 144 of 388
Thank you
jimwren
- 05 Jul 2005 08:29
- 145 of 388
why can i no longer access the investor room threads via the comments at the bottom of the quote page ? all i get is an error code.
SEADOG
- 05 Jul 2005 08:54
- 146 of 388
Cant access investors room via "Favorites" but can access Moneyam then go to investors room. Also cannot access Trades on NLR Programm not responding coming up. Also when you type a message in the posting box then go to another page to check something when you come back to the message its wiped out and you have to start from scratch.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 08:57
- 147 of 388
jimwren,
We are aware of this problem and working to resolve it - please accept my apologies.
SEADOG,
Can you resave the investors room URL as a favourite to see if this makes any difference. I have just tried NLR on trades and have been able to access it fine - can you copy and paste the error page you are getting and e mail it to me ian@moneyam.com? IF you navigate away from the bulletin board whilst typing a message but before you have posted that message, it will not be retained - this works in the same way as the old BB's
Ian
SEADOG
- 05 Jul 2005 09:03
- 148 of 388
I am able to access NLR trades page but it will not scroll thats when the error comes up
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 05 Jul 2005 09:04
- 149 of 388
SEADOG,
I am not sure I understand so please forgive my ignorance - are you saying that you can get the trades page up, but when you try to scroll down or use the mouse wheel to scroll down it changes to an error page?
Ian
SEADOG
- 05 Jul 2005 09:07
- 150 of 388
Yes thats it
SEADOG
- 05 Jul 2005 09:09
- 151 of 388
Deleted old investors room and inserted new ---- works fine now SD