Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Alternate Vote (AV) - for or against?     

cynic - 25 Apr 2011 07:53

this important referendum is nearly upon us and i thought it would be interesting explore the views held by this BB

after much thought, i have decided to vote against AV
i do not dispute that "first past post the post" is in some ways unfair - so is life and golf! - but i am far from convinced that AV is intrinsically much better

i would rather have a stronger gov't of some hue than a weak coalition or mps (and parties) who have felt obliged to trim their sails to offend the least number and thus gain a few more secondary votes

full-blown PR is at least "fair", but even then, there are many examples of horribly weak and unstable gov'ts, which is also pretty disastrous

finally, and of greatest concern, i suspect the turnout for this referendum will be +/-35% at best and probably a lot lower in many parts of the country
it follows that those who vote in this will be (relative) "activists" for lack of a better word, for the run-of-the-mill voter will find the whole thing too complicated and voting on it all, too much of a fag
thus, if there is a change in our voting system, then it is very likely to have been pushed through by <20% of the electorate - is that fair?

gibby - 07 May 2011 13:38 - 144 of 178

well glad to see common sense prevailed and the no vote won

and to anyone considering voting for the lib dems - apart from a myriad of stupid policies dont forget they would open the immigration flood gates which as labour were doing will finish off this country once and fall - i have nothing personal against immigrants but a lot of them come here and take the piss, additionally uk is only a small country, infrastructure can not take anymore, we are skint thanks to labour, they have been taken the majority of jobs et cetera

and labour - what useless hypocrites - they run the country in to the ground living on credit - giving uk money to countries that use it incorrectly or who are better off than the uk e.g. china - labour and those 2 idiots crazy nut blair and brown the imbecile have ruined the uk

brown mr prudent - thats a laff if it wasnt so sad!!!! LOL! ps dont ask him to sell any gold you may have spare - what a twot he is!

i could go on and on about labour - but i can not think of one thing they did that was a success and that they actually carried out correct due dilligence before implementing anything - idiots

gibby - 07 May 2011 13:39 - 145 of 178

sorry the typos - in a hurry just now

Haystack - 07 May 2011 15:28 - 146 of 178

The 10 local authorities which voted YES were Lambeth, Southwark, Islington, Camden, Haringey and Hackney in London along with Oxford, Cambridge, Glasgow Kelvin and Edinburgh Central.

430 NO AND 10 YES

TANKER - 07 May 2011 15:31 - 147 of 178

take a look and read about ealing hospital . immigrants are destoying the foundations of the uk . the planet is being destoyed faster than people think.breeding out of control STOP THE BENEFITS FOR HAVING KIDS

Fred1new - 07 May 2011 17:23 - 148 of 178

Tanker,

It does seem a pity that some parents were allowed to breed.

I have a "feeling" that when the Scots feel the consequences of Georgie's economic policies then Salmond may have a walk over in a referendum on further devolution.

But of course it would mean closer relationship with the EU where the Scots are readily acceptable


Cameron already has his eyes bulging at the thought.

I wonder if Wales will move in the same direction.

Fred1new - 07 May 2011 17:32 - 149 of 178

Forgot. I now realise what Cameron meant by devolution of power to the local control and administration.


How many more cock ups is he going to be responsible for.

cynic - 07 May 2011 17:58 - 150 of 178

fred - i am getting so bored with 99% of your posts that i am sorely tempted to squelch you, where i am afraid you will be on your own, for it is not a function i ever use

Fred1new - 07 May 2011 18:13 - 151 of 178

C'est la vie!

Fred1new - 07 May 2011 18:18 - 152 of 178

Cynic.

I found out when I was a young boy, that often those who liked "handing it out" didn't have the "stomach to take it", and often cried "foul play" when the game got rough!

Haystack - 07 May 2011 18:18 - 153 of 178

The Labour Party are doomed at present. Ed Millipede is very unpopular with the country in general and his MPs even more so and unelectable.

The Labour Party is broke again. The Conservatives should walk any election during the next year or so. In fact as time goes on they should get a bigger and bigger majority. There have been several suggestion today of an autumn election called by Cameron.

gibby - 07 May 2011 18:22 - 154 of 178

fred - not as many cock ups as labour are responsible for - that would be impossible - europe used & abused labour, so called human rights - what a mess, prisoners claimimg thousands of pounds for falling out of bed! prisoners living in luxury etc, labours stupid targets ruined hospitals with management teams, schooling - oh i know need to hit our targets so lets make the exams easier and lower the goal posts, money wasted not by the million but billion, sickness benefit, single mother benefit, immigrants benefit (note the skewed figures of immigration from labour from the minority they knew and admitted weree here were based on adults coming in only and does not include their brood of kids - and boy do they breed 5 + children a norm), plastic police, police spending more time on red tape and i am not even started yet - cameron has a long way to go to emulate that pile of shat and considering the shat labour left in their wake at least he is getting things done - has to or uk plc is finished eg cameron is tackling the work shy who claim sickness - many have now signed off or been removed - it should only go to the real sick people not the ones that labour did not tackle because they were scared of losing thier votes et cetera et cetera!

gibby - 07 May 2011 18:25 - 155 of 178

oh and bLIAR, friends with the likes of gadaffi!

cynic - 07 May 2011 19:21 - 156 of 178

fred - it's just that i find nearly all your posts thoroughly tiresome and, apart from inside your own head, all too often without proper logic, let alone common sense .... in fact, i think much of what you post is merely for effect and to be contentious with neither cause nor true justification .... if that's what rocks your boat, then good luck to you i guess, though i for one just feel sorry for you and remain very thankful that we do not move in the same circles

Haystack - 07 May 2011 19:27 - 157 of 178

Vince Cable's attack on the ruthless Tories is a bit pathetic. The Liberals are playing in the senior playground for once, but they don't seem to know the rules. They are complaining to the teacher that the big boys are too rough for them.

The answer may be to go back to the junior playground where nurse is handy to put some ointment on those grazed knees and give them a comforting hug. It is much safer pretending you want power and knowing you won't get it.

I saw an interview with Max Hasting a few weeks ago where he said, "The Liberals always were the Silly Party and they still are".

Cameron offered them any date they wanted for the AV referendum. They chose the end of the first year when you could bet that they would be unpopular. Had they waited for a couple more years when the economy might have been a lot better then they could have risen in popularity and the public would have wanted to give them a chance. The public knew very well that the Liberals were the only real gainer in a change in the voting system, which is why they voted NO out of spite.

As it is, the Liberal voters feel betrayed, not realising that in a coalition you can't have all your wishes come true.

TANKER - 07 May 2011 19:53 - 158 of 178

fred. you are a fool and i expect you are a small time player. so go and play with the children which is about your score

Fred1new - 08 May 2011 09:11 - 159 of 178

I see the concert party are out again with their mantras.

Tanker, you seem to be sinking again, why not try a little unpaid work for the Cameron society.

It would be interesting to have an election in 12 months time.

As far the financing the political parties is concerned,I think it suggests a corrupt society when a small number of individual similar to Murdock, Aschroft and some others who have their money in overseas tax havens are able to buy political party.

As Vince Cable suggested the tory party is a tribe and tribal and still for many the Nasty Party.

I will watch with interest the demise of the present government.





Sequestor - 08 May 2011 10:15 - 160 of 178

Great posts guys

bogbrush.

kernow - 08 May 2011 14:36 - 161 of 178

Fred - I don't share your politics but I do enjoy your posts. Please ignore those who can't take a pluralistic view.

Fred1new - 08 May 2011 19:03 - 162 of 178

Kernow,

Thank you.


It takes courage to question one's own "beliefs" and realising the long term consequences of one's actions.

Some are too frightened to do so.

But my next important question to answer for myself, is whether I cook the mussels before or after the squid.


It is nice now to be only to be responsible for personal decisions actions and consequences.


cynic - 08 May 2011 20:24 - 163 of 178

fred - does one therefore assume that wife and offspring have fled the nest?
  • Page:
  • 1
  • ...
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Register now or login to post to this thread.