bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Oilywag
- 14 Feb 2006 07:24
- 14802 of 27111
Oilywag
Starpol 2000 formally and officially approved by the US FDA for all food types.
Howard White says this is a major step forward in getting Starpol recognised at the industry standard. He will update the market as and when trials begin.
Any comments Bling now about 10p you gormless idiot?
The oily one
oblomov
- 14 Feb 2006 07:27
- 14803 of 27111
US FDA approval for Starpol
Stanelco PLC
14 February 2006
14th February 2006
Stanelco plc (Stanelco" or "the Company")
Full US FDA approval granted for Starpol 2000
Biodegradable Packaging Material
Stanelco, the RF (radio frequency) applications group, is pleased to announce
full food contact approval has now been granted in the United States by the US
FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for all food categories for its Starpol 2000
biodegradeable packaging material.
This follows Stanelco's earlier announcement on 12th October 2005, regarding the
food contact approval of its Starpol 2000 biodegradable Packaging Material,
following extensive analysis and testing carried out by PIRA International
(Packaging International Research Association).
Full commercial trials are now underway in the US and further details of these
will be announced in due course.
Howard White, Managing Director of Stanelco, commented:
"This is a major step forward in taking our products and technology into the US
marketplace. We are excited about the prospects for Starpol 2000 as a global
standard in packaging materials. We will update the market as our commercial
trials take place."
- Ends -
oblomov
- 14 Feb 2006 07:29
- 14804 of 27111
I like this bit:-
'Full commercial trials are now underway in the US and further details of these
will be announced in due course.'
bhunt1910
- 14 Feb 2006 07:52
- 14805 of 27111
So - does this mean that Starpol 3000 gets automatic approval - or have we got to go through all that again.??
oblomov
- 14 Feb 2006 08:06
- 14806 of 27111
SP is flying, Bling. Still short?
BTW ADVFN offering days free Lecel 2 trial today.
hewittalan6
- 14 Feb 2006 08:07
- 14807 of 27111
News of the commercial trials might spice the results up a bit.
What is the nature of the trials and who are they with?
I'm prepared to bet half an ounce of snout that they are with that shadowy yank company with links to Pepsi and McDonalds, rather than WalMart.
Any takers?
Alan
hugybear
- 14 Feb 2006 08:09
- 14808 of 27111
oblomov
get a grip it's only a trial
there has only been 40k traded
price flying
lol
hewittalan6
- 14 Feb 2006 08:11
- 14809 of 27111
blinger - 13 Feb 2006 19:31 - 14796 of 14808
the chart shows the future, 10p
Chart upside down, blinger???
ROTFLJHFGHBUJHG
kimoldfield
- 14 Feb 2006 08:46
- 14810 of 27111
No point telling him that Alan, he obviously can't read.
Kim
blinger
- 14 Feb 2006 09:06
- 14811 of 27111
lol
First rule of investment-NEVER trade a but before 9.30a.m., the "news" is so overwhelming that 250k worth of shares have been bought- my garage is worth more.
All the news means is that more trials are needed, and indeed the $$$$ spend is underway, more cash calls from holders will occur, and the sad saga will go on and on, until someone buys the whole lot for twopence.
Turnover /profit/ dividends is the news which moves shares exponentially, also ruMours of course but they are all exhausted.
Wait for the penny to drop AGAIN-and see the result later, I see from the empty holes in the thread from the brain-dead, that they are all posting like mad- none of them seem to be buying though
ROTFLMCO!!!!!
stockdog
- 14 Feb 2006 09:12
- 14812 of 27111
Talking of charts, SEO's has developed almost unnoticed from one that bounces up off the 14p level to one that bounces down off the 16p level. Once we break up through 16p, that should provide the next solid floor.
Still watching out for a break down through 14p, but today's news on what will probably become SEO's major product shifts the risk on this share into more positive territory.
Doubters might want to step back in soon (Bosley?).
sd
hewittalan6
- 14 Feb 2006 09:12
- 14813 of 27111
How to spot an arsehole, part one.
He posts at 09:07 on 13/02/2006 to say there is selling momentum on a share when 1.5 million shares have been traded and laughs that the share is about to drop badly.
He posts at the same time the following day (when the share is up) and says never trade before 09:30, and follows this by saying the 2million trades are a piddling nothing.
If anyone spots this kind of arsehole behaviour, please refer them to your local psychiatrist.
Alan
stockdog
- 14 Feb 2006 09:14
- 14814 of 27111
alan
the most reliable thing about bling is your inevitable response to each of his posts. why do it?
sd
blinger
- 14 Feb 2006 09:17
- 14815 of 27111
The only time to buy is when `they` issue a positive profit forecast, folk who fall in love with a share move onto a different mind-set, where everything is rosy after every RNS,then they go into decline again until the next one comes, they then gain mutual support from other naifs ( always with a `King` to advise),& insult and abuse anyone who threatens their gang by urging caution.
Meanwile the management spend the dough, attract nice little earners in salaries. it`s happened thousands of times.
ps shares fall 3X faster than they rise, so multiply the sales by 3X to interpret their true significance
hewittalan6
- 14 Feb 2006 09:18
- 14816 of 27111
Its fun, sd.
Believe it or not, some people believe him!!! There are many silent readers of this thread who actually might take notice of him. I think it in the interests of balance that where he can be shown to be an outrageous liar, he is.
Alan
blinger
- 14 Feb 2006 09:38
- 14817 of 27111
The US government learned many years back that you can`t be happy in the modern world without being profligate with natural resources, every Westerv government is slowly learning that too.To assume that the US will go crazy over conservation and allow its citizens to become ( what they see as `poor`) is to underestimate the greed of the human race.Who do you vote for, the party which promises three cars per household, or the one which is Green,and demands one?.
"Jeez Elmer, I just bought you some lettuce wrapped in biodegradable wrapping, wat`cha think of that then"- reply and expletives deleted-I can just see the TV commercial now-lol!!!!!!!!!
oblomov
- 14 Feb 2006 09:50
- 14818 of 27111
You've lost me there slightly, bling, as I thought there were significant savings to be made using Greenseal/Starpol over current packaging.
Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.
If I'm not, I'm sure you'll concede that the Yanks might be interested in the cost saving aspect, if not the planet saving aspect.
garyble
- 14 Feb 2006 09:54
- 14819 of 27111
No-one in their right mind would believe CBB. I read his drivel just in case there is anything of substance......sadly none to date.
I commend him on his hard work though, he needs to earn a crust.....Nuff said!
Another piece of the puzzle falls into place as has been said. All confirms the so called rampers expectations.
Only results to go, which should hopefully shed light on the GS situation and that will be all of the potential grey clouds out of the way..........do I see blue skies on the horizon??
bhunt1910
- 14 Feb 2006 09:58
- 14820 of 27111
I see lots of blue sky on the horizon - with a few clouds and maybe the occasional thunderstorm - but generally the weather is set to fair.
All this talk of weather - I go awa y at the end of next week - and the sp almost always invariably rises whilst I am away?
I wonder what Blong will think of my analytical prognosis ???
garyble
- 14 Feb 2006 09:59
- 14821 of 27111
Oblo,
The decadent Yanks would much prefer to have the kudos of paying more and having an inferior seal and product preservation, than suffering the shame of appearing poor by moving to a greatly improved packaging system with the incidental attribute of being biodegrable. Makes sense to me.