cynic
- 25 Apr 2011 07:53
this important referendum is nearly upon us and i thought it would be interesting explore the views held by this BB
after much thought, i have decided to vote against AV
i do not dispute that "first past post the post" is in some ways unfair - so is life and golf! - but i am far from convinced that AV is intrinsically much better
i would rather have a stronger gov't of some hue than a weak coalition or mps (and parties) who have felt obliged to trim their sails to offend the least number and thus gain a few more secondary votes
full-blown PR is at least "fair", but even then, there are many examples of horribly weak and unstable gov'ts, which is also pretty disastrous
finally, and of greatest concern, i suspect the turnout for this referendum will be +/-35% at best and probably a lot lower in many parts of the country
it follows that those who vote in this will be (relative) "activists" for lack of a better word, for the run-of-the-mill voter will find the whole thing too complicated and voting on it all, too much of a fag
thus, if there is a change in our voting system, then it is very likely to have been pushed through by <20% of the electorate - is that fair?
cynic
- 07 May 2011 19:21
- 156 of 178
fred - it's just that i find nearly all your posts thoroughly tiresome and, apart from inside your own head, all too often without proper logic, let alone common sense .... in fact, i think much of what you post is merely for effect and to be contentious with neither cause nor true justification .... if that's what rocks your boat, then good luck to you i guess, though i for one just feel sorry for you and remain very thankful that we do not move in the same circles
Haystack
- 07 May 2011 19:27
- 157 of 178
Vince Cable's attack on the ruthless Tories is a bit pathetic. The Liberals are playing in the senior playground for once, but they don't seem to know the rules. They are complaining to the teacher that the big boys are too rough for them.
The answer may be to go back to the junior playground where nurse is handy to put some ointment on those grazed knees and give them a comforting hug. It is much safer pretending you want power and knowing you won't get it.
I saw an interview with Max Hasting a few weeks ago where he said, "The Liberals always were the Silly Party and they still are".
Cameron offered them any date they wanted for the AV referendum. They chose the end of the first year when you could bet that they would be unpopular. Had they waited for a couple more years when the economy might have been a lot better then they could have risen in popularity and the public would have wanted to give them a chance. The public knew very well that the Liberals were the only real gainer in a change in the voting system, which is why they voted NO out of spite.
As it is, the Liberal voters feel betrayed, not realising that in a coalition you can't have all your wishes come true.
TANKER
- 07 May 2011 19:53
- 158 of 178
fred. you are a fool and i expect you are a small time player. so go and play with the children which is about your score
Fred1new
- 08 May 2011 09:11
- 159 of 178
I see the concert party are out again with their mantras.
Tanker, you seem to be sinking again, why not try a little unpaid work for the Cameron society.
It would be interesting to have an election in 12 months time.
As far the financing the political parties is concerned,I think it suggests a corrupt society when a small number of individual similar to Murdock, Aschroft and some others who have their money in overseas tax havens are able to buy political party.
As Vince Cable suggested the tory party is a tribe and tribal and still for many the Nasty Party.
I will watch with interest the demise of the present government.
Sequestor
- 08 May 2011 10:15
- 160 of 178
Great posts guys
bogbrush.
kernow
- 08 May 2011 14:36
- 161 of 178
Fred - I don't share your politics but I do enjoy your posts. Please ignore those who can't take a pluralistic view.
Fred1new
- 08 May 2011 19:03
- 162 of 178
Kernow,
Thank you.
It takes courage to question one's own "beliefs" and realising the long term consequences of one's actions.
Some are too frightened to do so.
But my next important question to answer for myself, is whether I cook the mussels before or after the squid.
It is nice now to be only to be responsible for personal decisions actions and consequences.
cynic
- 08 May 2011 20:24
- 163 of 178
fred - does one therefore assume that wife and offspring have fled the nest?
Fred1new
- 08 May 2011 21:16
- 164 of 178
The wife hasn't, but my four daughters have, but all enjoy my cooking.
(Generally.)
Fred1new
- 08 May 2011 21:20
- 165 of 178
Ps.
Be careful, when you are in France as I will be arriving there towards the end of this week and I have a new recipe for Octopus.
The other part of my my mission "impossible" is to teach the French to understand my dialect.
gibby
- 08 May 2011 21:35
- 166 of 178
not fred the shred by any chance!
joking aside - not too keen on mussels - squid yes pls - like fried, calameres espana or maybe portuegese or even squid in its own milk aka calameres en su tinta - very versatile - enjoy however you prepare / cook
Bernard M
- 09 May 2011 07:04
- 167 of 178
Can't stand this slimey cnut.
cynic
- 09 May 2011 08:24
- 168 of 178
tinta = ink!
bernard - your comment smacks of anti-semiticism!
TANKER
- 09 May 2011 08:28
- 169 of 178
BM i agree . arsewipe is better
Fred1new
- 09 May 2011 08:55
- 170 of 178
Tanker,
Was Ed looking at you when the photograph was taken.
I see Cameron and his henchmen are taking another quick open reverse on the NHS and Politically appointed Police "chiefs".
He must have read to many American comics in Eton. Not the only mess they are famous for.
Fred1new
- 09 May 2011 08:58
- 171 of 178
I am sorry I am confusing new proposals with a review of policies.
It wasn't me gov., it was the previous Gov's policy.
HO HO HO.
TANKER
- 09 May 2011 11:12
- 172 of 178
f
TANKER
- 09 May 2011 11:20
- 173 of 178
.........
mnamreh
- 09 May 2011 12:04
- 174 of 178
.
TANKER
- 09 May 2011 12:11
- 175 of 178
mna. so you agree he was just that a human not a profit .
just imagine putting [ paul daniels ] back in those times .
he would of been a god immortal