bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
barney12345
- 15 Mar 2006 13:38
- 15603 of 27111
oily it is a test site and bits have been added gradually over the past week, it is still not complete, even so i think its childish and the croaking frogs are so tacky.
may be hunty but they have taken 18 months to get here i think it is optomistic to assume that they will have group website sorted within a few weeks.
check out the biotec site for example contacts are still in german!!!
dawall
- 15 Mar 2006 14:06
- 15604 of 27111
Hello All,
Read a lot of comment re. SEO's website. Has anyone contacted SEO and quizzed them about why it is so poor and when (not if) it is going to be rebuilt?
barney12345
- 15 Mar 2006 14:47
- 15605 of 27111
oh yes dawall i have tried several times
Biscuit
- 15 Mar 2006 15:12
- 15606 of 27111
I think Stanelco have more to do than bother about some website that makes no difference to the companies results. If that's all you have to complain about, I'd find something more to do with my time.
Biscuit
- 15 Mar 2006 15:49
- 15607 of 27111
There must be a large buyer out there soaking up all of the sells yet have seen no evidence as yet, only the way the share price is acting. Anyone see anything on Level 2?
barney12345
- 15 Mar 2006 15:53
- 15608 of 27111
Disagree Biscuit, i do not assume that the directors should learn HTML nor have a flashy world ranking website, in fact i would be happy if they binned it altogether.
BUT if they are going to have one make the god dam thing work, the BIOTEC contacts are still in German, i mean just take the site down if they cannot be bothered to rebrand it.
It would cost 5k to get the links working and the branding the same, but if a punter stumbles on to frogpack uk website the link to SEO does not work.
PUT IT RIGHT OR BIN IT.
Biscuit
- 15 Mar 2006 15:56
- 15609 of 27111
Ahhhhh, so it is one person with several names posting about the website. Thought so. I suggest you buy shares in Amazon.com if it's a website company you'd like.
barney12345
- 15 Mar 2006 16:08
- 15610 of 27111
NO Biscuit i have one name have always posted as one person have held seo shares since 3.5p and have always made that clear i am in for the long run but these people cannot organise a simple website and i think they should do so, if you do not fine but pls do not get defensive, we disagree so be it.
hewittalan6
- 15 Mar 2006 16:18
- 15612 of 27111
To be fair about websites, I have just developed a crap one for a business I am a partner in (if you want to know how crap, click on my greenhouse).
The point is that having the site is usually a precursor. You must have it up and running for about 3 months before it will be properly picked up by the crawlers and appear listed on a search. We put the site on long before it is ready, so that the readiness and the time the crawlers pick it up come together, otherwise we would spend ages developing a site, for it not to be reachable by a simple search.
I would sooner our site was visited and people say it is poor than delay its launch by about 3 months so that it was perfect from the start.
alan
Biscuit
- 15 Mar 2006 16:21
- 15613 of 27111
My god, you're right, I never thought of dial-up internet customers wanting to log on to their website. How many Greanseal sales lost?? I must sell my shares, this company will never get anywhere, reason: annoyed dial-up users. Class, I couldn't have made that one up!
bosley
- 15 Mar 2006 16:59
- 15614 of 27111
biscuit, you arrogant prick. the web site is a shop window. it's been up and running a few years now and any problems should have been sorted out. i agree that it isn't the most pressing of problems for seo at the moment , but , as people have pointed out, interested parties will look at the seo website for further information about the company. if you are looking to deal with a competent , professional outfit then you would expect their website to reflect that. this is the modern world and it has become the norm for companies to have working, attractive websites to stimulate interest and sales. this is something that should have been taken care of a long time ago. it isn't the first time the crapness of the seo website has been brought up.
stockdog
- 15 Mar 2006 17:00
- 15615 of 27111
I really don't like this breach of the 14p line - can anyone interpret waht's going on in MMland?
Thanks
sd
robinhood
- 15 Mar 2006 17:06
- 15616 of 27111
Getting tired of SEO's little deals with other companies that have been going on for about a year now. Remember training US engineers to achieve rapid roll out in the States? At this pace they will have retired before they are called upon. Anyone got a copy of John Cleese's " How to close a deal"? If so plse forward to SEO management team.
lukeman
- 15 Mar 2006 17:48
- 15617 of 27111
I keep getting tips to invest in this stock but for the life of me can't see why it is so hotly tipped and attracts so much attention. Is this company on the verge of turning enormous losses into a profit? If so, it doesn't look that way from anything that I have read. Before I get called a p***k, I am not an expert and only asking!
hewittalan6
- 15 Mar 2006 18:04
- 15618 of 27111
lukeman,
The losses are not that big and the potential upside is truely huge!!!
Names like Walmart, McDonalds and Pepsi are linked to this company as potential customers. Wal mart are already in discussion, so yes, the company may be on the verge of profit.
As always, its a risk and DYOR, but a good place to start is Drivers research page (link in the header).
Alan
Technotamed
- 15 Mar 2006 18:10
- 15619 of 27111
The trick is to get in early, higher risk but higher reward. With just 500 this gets you a lot of shares at the moment, you can add later if good progress is made.
ssanebs
- 15 Mar 2006 18:44
- 15621 of 27111
a colleague of mine sold 650,000 today which he bought ahead of the results, which has caused the slight drop. CEO back this week from the US so should bring news of the wal mart deal and further discussions with macdonalds.
sellsell
- 15 Mar 2006 18:45
- 15622 of 27111
did he make a profit ? are you still in ssanebs