for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

I think Stanelco have more to do than bother about some website that makes no difference to the companies results. If that's all you have to complain about, I'd find something more to do with my time.

There must be a large buyer out there soaking up all of the sells yet have seen no evidence as yet, only the way the share price is acting. Anyone see anything on Level 2?

Disagree Biscuit, i do not assume that the directors should learn HTML nor have a flashy world ranking website, in fact i would be happy if they binned it altogether.

BUT if they are going to have one make the god dam thing work, the BIOTEC contacts are still in German, i mean just take the site down if they cannot be bothered to rebrand it.

It would cost 5k to get the links working and the branding the same, but if a punter stumbles on to frogpack uk website the link to SEO does not work.

PUT IT RIGHT OR BIN IT.

Ahhhhh, so it is one person with several names posting about the website. Thought so. I suggest you buy shares in Amazon.com if it's a website company you'd like.

NO Biscuit i have one name have always posted as one person have held seo shares since 3.5p and have always made that clear i am in for the long run but these people cannot organise a simple website and i think they should do so, if you do not fine but pls do not get defensive, we disagree so be it.

Rich Tea
You must agree the Web Site is crap to start with you should never have music because people with dial up would click off waiting for it to load, also they should have made sure every thing is working 100% before launching the Site.

To be fair about websites, I have just developed a crap one for a business I am a partner in (if you want to know how crap, click on my greenhouse).
The point is that having the site is usually a precursor. You must have it up and running for about 3 months before it will be properly picked up by the crawlers and appear listed on a search. We put the site on long before it is ready, so that the readiness and the time the crawlers pick it up come together, otherwise we would spend ages developing a site, for it not to be reachable by a simple search.
I would sooner our site was visited and people say it is poor than delay its launch by about 3 months so that it was perfect from the start.
alan

My god, you're right, I never thought of dial-up internet customers wanting to log on to their website. How many Greanseal sales lost?? I must sell my shares, this company will never get anywhere, reason: annoyed dial-up users. Class, I couldn't have made that one up!

biscuit, you arrogant prick. the web site is a shop window. it's been up and running a few years now and any problems should have been sorted out. i agree that it isn't the most pressing of problems for seo at the moment , but , as people have pointed out, interested parties will look at the seo website for further information about the company. if you are looking to deal with a competent , professional outfit then you would expect their website to reflect that. this is the modern world and it has become the norm for companies to have working, attractive websites to stimulate interest and sales. this is something that should have been taken care of a long time ago. it isn't the first time the crapness of the seo website has been brought up.

I really don't like this breach of the 14p line - can anyone interpret waht's going on in MMland?

Thanks

sd

Getting tired of SEO's little deals with other companies that have been going on for about a year now. Remember training US engineers to achieve rapid roll out in the States? At this pace they will have retired before they are called upon. Anyone got a copy of John Cleese's " How to close a deal"? If so plse forward to SEO management team.

I keep getting tips to invest in this stock but for the life of me can't see why it is so hotly tipped and attracts so much attention. Is this company on the verge of turning enormous losses into a profit? If so, it doesn't look that way from anything that I have read. Before I get called a p***k, I am not an expert and only asking!

lukeman,
The losses are not that big and the potential upside is truely huge!!!
Names like Walmart, McDonalds and Pepsi are linked to this company as potential customers. Wal mart are already in discussion, so yes, the company may be on the verge of profit.
As always, its a risk and DYOR, but a good place to start is Drivers research page (link in the header).
Alan

The trick is to get in early, higher risk but higher reward. With just 500 this gets you a lot of shares at the moment, you can add later if good progress is made.

Tech
Gets you even more PCM 384615 to be precise.

a colleague of mine sold 650,000 today which he bought ahead of the results, which has caused the slight drop. CEO back this week from the US so should bring news of the wal mart deal and further discussions with macdonalds.

did he make a profit ? are you still in ssanebs

Hi all,

I agree with all who say the website is important, so much so that I contacted SEO about it around October I think and offered to update the site for free. I was told thanks but they had two people working on it....

It would take someone just a few hours to tidy up the dead links, wrong info etc and that was what I offered to do.

I agree they do not have to spend tens of thousands as they are not an E-Commerce site but with all the PR they have had with a link back to SEO you would just think that all the information should be easily accessible and at least look semi professional. You have to make your website work for you.

hewittalan6, had a look at your website, it is not crap! it looks professional and does the job, the only thing I would say is that using Flash does have it's limitations when it comes to promoting the site via Search Engines.

Anyways, I am still confident in SEO but just get frustrated from time to time. I still topped up last week though :)

D@Z

Agree with DaZSEO and more important Bosley, think he sums the situation up perfectly, and it is a poor reflection on the company and is easy and quick to sort out, but bit like the converting the low hanging fruit that we talk about , both are easy but there seems to be a problem converting.

Here's hoping for a better day tomorrow, I followed the trades on global topic today and there seemed to be as many buyers as sellers, however may see more selling over the next few days, as financial year is coming to a close and people maybe trying to realise losses, hopefully buying back after the 6th

Biscuit I disagree, if they are going to have a website then they should get it right, working, polished and professional looking. Anything else just gives the impression of shabbiness, couldn't care less, it doesn't really matter attitude so how would a potential new customer view their products? It's all about marketing and projecting the right image. If they aint got the time then the should get someone hired PDQ, they are a 100m+ business (for now anyway), they should get it done.