bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
hewittalan6
- 12 May 2006 07:37
- 16484 of 27111
Are you trying to bait me, Boz??
I've been sat here being a good boy and not getting involved in the arguments (for a change) and you go and tempt me with something like that!!
Lets just say I mirror your thoughts!!!
Alan
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 08:06
- 16485 of 27111
Eric, I dont think I've been 'un-nice' to PM1 and Family, at least I hope not. Just disagreed and pointed out that IMO caution should be applied in connection to him.
I know that in amongst the reams of drivel he comes up with some great research - unfortunately amongst the reams of drivel there lurks some, at best, misleading material whether intentional (thats debatable) or not!
Lively debate keeps the BB alive and interesting and unless it evolves into abuse and insults (which I haven't seen lately) - I think it should be encouraged not censored. A BB where nothing is challenged becomes impotent - there is just no point to it.
greekman
- 12 May 2006 08:26
- 16486 of 27111
Another little snippet,
I'll just put the interesting points.
Friday, 05/12/06
Gallatin cleans up tomorrow
By Linda Bryant
The News Examiner
Old cigarette butts tossed away by smokers present one big dilemma in the city.
Its a huge problem, Baril said. They are especially harmful because theyre toxic. It (poison from tobacco) gets into the groundwater and ends up in our lakes and rivers. It kills fish and other wildlife.
Take-out packaging from the fast food industry is another pesky problem.
According to a national survey, its the take-out fast food packaging that is the single highest percentage category of problem litter, Baril said.
The survey found that litter from the restaurant and fast food industry comprises about 21 percent of litter.
OK with bio-gradeable litter, the litter problem will still be there, but for a shorter time in areas where it is not removed ( IE it will bio-grade ) and on removal it will break down re landfill etc.
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 11:15
- 16487 of 27111
Just looking back over some old stuff and found this on Frogpack, which we tend to overlook.
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/producttest%20files/pinder%20frog%20box%202-50ft%20drop-prutton.mpg
From
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/producttest.htm
This stuff has a great potential when used on wine bottles - just consider the market, its massive. This video from the time of the Frogpack launch shows a bottle being dropped from a helicopter!
explosive
- 12 May 2006 11:26
- 16488 of 27111
Excellent, I'll be sure to now call a helicopter to collect me and my shopping from Tesco!! I reckon Richard Branson could be interested in this packaging, he could pack himself in it for his next balloon adventure!!
barney12345
- 12 May 2006 12:40
- 16489 of 27111
You would not be cutting and pasting old news there would you Oblo??????????
greekman
- 12 May 2006 12:47
- 16490 of 27111
Old news it may be, but as said we do tend to overlook innovations such as Frogpack. Seo have so many irons in the melting pot that sometimes we concentrate of just one or two. Product such as Frogpack may surprise us all and start earning big money before Greanseal/ Starpol. It's nice to be reminded of this sometimes.
barney12345
- 12 May 2006 12:50
- 16491 of 27111
Yes I know just winding him up, we do need to be reminded, but do not get the feeling Frogpack is flying off the shelves. QUANTOM on the other hand is.
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 12:51
- 16492 of 27111
Barney, Mea Culpa!
But it does have a current relevance which some will get.
No further comment!
shamona
- 12 May 2006 13:18
- 16493 of 27111
PM1 is a psycho nutter; his other 2 holdings recently were EVS and LGB, he ramped both to death till they both unsurprisingly went out of business.
I doubt the fellow could pick his nose let alone a stock!
He has a severe case of ocd imo; a very ill man, best not encouraged.
Oilywag
- 12 May 2006 14:48
- 16495 of 27111
Driver
Don't encourage him. Most on this board I think were of an opinion that Shamona is an annoying idiot who seldom ever supports his ranting with any constructive evidence.
Of the two, I'd far rather have PM1 and not just because he has a more positive attitude than most about SEO.
The oily one
JJS
- 12 May 2006 15:50
- 16497 of 27111
shamona
Get a life you dipstick, nobody is listening to you !
JJS
- 12 May 2006 15:51
- 16498 of 27111
Well thats the first ever squelch by me, and well deserved IMHO.
shamona is squelched
bosley
- 12 May 2006 15:58
- 16499 of 27111
oh nooooooooooo, the squelchmeister is in full force.
driver's right, oily. shamona got it righ time and again. for that he deserves to be listened to and respected.
shamona, ocd? more like schizophrenia.
oblomov
- 12 May 2006 16:21
- 16500 of 27111
I agree with Bos - I've always felt Shamona to a most astute investor - several times he read it right on the button. Got my respect. I'll always read his posts with interest. I dont think his astuteness stops with his investments either, form his post above! lol
explosive
- 12 May 2006 16:28
- 16501 of 27111
I'm also with Shamona although I thought the poster was a laydee!!!!! OOpppsss.... Either way accurate posts and has ridden the profit out of SEO with some very well timed buys / sells.
I also agree PM1 is a fool, I had plenty of arguements with that one ramping on. Its only a shame Blinger isn't still around, there are some on this thread that would have got on with his shorting!!
JJS
- 12 May 2006 17:04
- 16502 of 27111
shamona never tells you about the times he gets it wrong, and nobody, even PM1, is 100% right 100% of the time, so stop talking drivel PLEASE !
If you want to crawl up shamona's bum that will be your loss.
JJS
- 12 May 2006 17:05
- 16503 of 27111
See you all on Monday.