bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 13 May 2006 17:49
- 16530 of 27111
Oblo,
My comment about the "familiar squelch list" was simply to say that the posting of who's been squelched is peculiar to:
PM1
CF3
Gary H
JJS
Haven't squelched anyone for quite some time. Wheat & Chaff really. Don't mind constructive negative perspective, but certain bods just don't deserve the time of day.
stockdog
- 13 May 2006 19:27
- 16532 of 27111
driver
my prediction is 140p in 5 years - has been for about a year.
my perdition, on the other hand, I hope to postpone a little longer!
JJS
- 13 May 2006 21:13
- 16533 of 27111
Garyble,
It's nice to see a concensus.
JJS
- 13 May 2006 21:18
- 16534 of 27111
It's quite nice to see Stanelco here, with a half decent description.
http://www.iccwbo.org/bascap/id6690/index.html?cookies=no
tweenie
- 13 May 2006 22:11
- 16535 of 27111
i'll be happy with 50p for xmas.
Alan your as astute as ever..... a very good posting.
gave me pause for thought.
Lets hope some VERY positive news with sound financials appears soon.
Please,please SHOW ME THE MONEY
hewittalan6
- 14 May 2006 08:01
- 16536 of 27111
If I'm completely honest...........about 4000 posts ago we were talking about a 50p party in Donny. I said then that it would not be in time for the 2005 St Leger, but perhaps the 2006 one. I'm not even certain about that now!
50p by Christmas? Maybe. But I would imagine it to be more like 40p by Q4 2006, and 80p-1 12 months after that.
The possibility still remains that we will bump along at 13-17p for a lot longer yet. Negative impacts include a potential bear run in general, micro manufacturing sites taking much longer than anticipated to agree and commission, an easing in the very high price of oil, much lower margins on Starpol than anticipated.
Positive impacts have been listed many times and I believe are far more likely than the negative ones, but a fickle market of impatient investors requires that every negative event is balanced by two positive ones just to maintain the price at the same levels.
Tweenie sums it up with show me the money. Most investors feel the same way and until cash is on the table, in quantifiable amounts, the darn thing will not go anywhere near its true potential.
One of those rare companies where the sp is now more likely to be based on historical achievements rather than the furuture projections we should buy or sell on.
Those are my thoughts anyway.
Now just watch an RNS on Monday make me look a right tit.
Alan
oblomov
- 14 May 2006 09:49
- 16537 of 27111
Totally off topic for which apologies but there is a message for one poster here ! Click the button and play the demo. Priceless!
http://www.amstrad.com/amsface/index.html#
jameshunt1985
- 14 May 2006 17:41
- 16538 of 27111
10th May was a busy day for this stock. Have looked back over the last 4 days to check whether this has been mentioned but can't find any reference so Id thought I post it, apologies for any repetition.
Have Just been looking at the SEO website and found a press release that hasn't been mentioned. Not exceedingly exciting but mentions all the patents that Aquasol have. Just thought I'd throw my two pence worth in.
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/downloads/Aquasol patent portfolio.pdf
In truth, Trying to put my mind to anything but finals revision!!
Heres to a NON JAM RNS tommorrow!!
Hunty...
EWRobson
- 14 May 2006 21:57
- 16540 of 27111
Presumably James is 21 this year; name the date, sir, and also where the party will be. We can also run a competition on the sp of SEO on that date. If its already past, then we can always wait for the 22nd - birthday that is.
Well done, Alan. Driver wins for stickability. Bosley also, for sticking around long after he sold out. You share my addiction, or should it be seoddiction? My own view remains with the tsunamists that when this breaks it will break upwards with immense momentum. So the cap is around 125m: if it goes on having great problems bringing its ideas to commercial reality there is probably not less than 100m worth of ideas to sell. But if they get take up on a significant scale from Walmart, perseco, macDonalds, to name but 3, then we are talking about a multiple of 10 for starters. The risk is - it will never happen. How big is that risk -evens? Still not a bad bet - better than the Hammers!
Eric
bhunt1910
- 14 May 2006 22:05
- 16541 of 27111
Hi Bos, Alan, Eric etal
just a quick hello - more of a lurker these days as not quite so much time to spend on the boards as involved in converting some flats - trying my hand at the property game - but if the truth be known - I needed to do something to get me away from the PC as my waistline was starting to expand and I needed a bit more exercise.
Still have a sizeable 7 figure holding in SEO, still confident for the long term - but as with others, my timing was hopelessly out and too ambitious - so have rejigged my targets and nowlooking for 50p by this xmas (was last xmas).
Good luck all
Baza
oblomov
- 14 May 2006 22:09
- 16542 of 27111
Interesting (and familiar) post from ADVFN (strange they have the idea there that Gary H and PM1 are the same person!):-
waywardlad - 12 May'06 - 23:43 - 62663 of 62672
Gary H - 12 May'06 - 23:20 - 62662 of 62662
Just to prove once and for all that you moron's know nothing in comparison to me, there will be an RNS on Monday at 7am, and it won't be what you expect (a deal)
You see, some of us have the right contacts, you just wear glasses LOL !
PM1/Gary H
Plenty of RNS's at 7am every day. Can you be a bit more specific and if you are correct you will get the respect you deserve. Same goes for if you are wrong
Tonyrelaxes
- 14 May 2006 22:31
- 16543 of 27111
Hi all. recently back from a few days in Le Massif des Maures. (Not visiting Agences d'Immobilier - YET!!).
Looking at posts recently, both here and from where the above was C'n'Pasted, I get the distinct impression that some are more interested in scoring points against other posters rather than all of us helping each other beat MMs, the market, and generally being ahead of the game in terms of making, or preserving, our wealths.
PEOPLE - if you do not like the flavour of a poster, reach for the squelch/filter button. That way we can concentrate on the posters we respect and ignore those we do not. Saves so much time, energy - and worsening relations.
Come on, forget proving points, being right, better informed etc, - give it a try. We could all gain.
Tony
Oilywag
- 14 May 2006 23:31
- 16544 of 27111
Oi you Eric
You lay off the Hammers!!!!!
They contributed a huge amount to a grate (yes I deliberately spelt it wrong) Cup Final yesterday and were gallant losers. Who'd have thought they would have give 'Pool such a fright, hey?
lol
Tony
Quite agree with you.
The oily one
jameshunt1985
- 15 May 2006 00:49
- 16545 of 27111
Sorry EWRobson, it was on the 26th January, I think. I remember going out on the evening of the 25th and the next thing I new it was the 27th. My girlfriend said that I had an awesome time though, so that makes it ok!!
So share price for 26/01/2007 then, shotgun first prediction... I'd say going on what seo has in store and what I want to get out of my meagre holding, anything between 35 - 55p and I'll be more than happy. Although anything above 16.5 and I'll be happy as I will then be breaking even...
Oilywag
- 15 May 2006 07:57
- 16546 of 27111
' Morning all
What difference is the appointment of T&G going to make to the share price this morning. Very little I would think.
Isn't this the third broker we've had in the past twelve months? Why the change? Thought that there was a general concensus that the last lot were doing a better job than their predecessors.
The oily one
JJS
- 15 May 2006 08:02
- 16547 of 27111
Oily,
We had KBC in mid 2004 then EVO late 2005 so not quite the 3rd in the last 12 months :))
Anyway, an RNS @ 7am ;)
hewittalan6
- 15 May 2006 08:04
- 16548 of 27111
Fairs fair.
An RNS @ 7am, and not what we expected, just as forecast.
The question now is, Why???
Alan
oblomov
- 15 May 2006 08:23
- 16549 of 27111
Not exactly a forecast, Alan, more a leak, which is a little worrying.
The 'forecast' came from a PM1 email over the weekend, I understand. I wonder if the leak is from T & G - if so, this is not a good start to their appointment.
Although this leak is not of a particularly sensitive nature it is indicative that a person or persons is willing to leak information - future leaks may be of a more sensitive nature and may not be shared on the BB's - we have no way of knowing.
I'm taking this up with SEO.
Tony,
Nothing to do with point scoring, more about getting at the truth, and I'm surprised at your post considering your involvement PM1 on FYB last year over the Crown affair, which resulted in his ban. 'forget proving points, being right, better informed etc' - isn't that what debate is, or is this BB purely a notice board to which you pin whatever tripe you like without fear of it being challenged?
I respect the majority of you posts, Tony, but I think you've lost the plot with that one!