Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

Jesus H Christ fahel-I watched in disgust the propaganda video. so much false statements. The refugees left and were not forced out. Sharon had nothing to do with sabra and Shatill-and you know it.The shanty towns in Jordan and Lebanon are still there because it is a tool for the paletinians to infiltrate those countries and cause misery to the Lebanese and Jordanian citizens. have you forgotten how good King hussein kicked the palestinians out of Jordan? And where did they go-lebanon and what happened then-a civil war.

the paelstinians are not wanted by any Arab country. Those that remained in israel prefer to live there.

We have Palestinian Muslims in london causing outrage. They too should be kicked out before we end up like Beirut.
Palestinians are trouble.Full stop.

Lest you forget fahel.

Arab and Jewish Refugees: in 1948 the Arab refugees were
encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge
theland of Jews. Sixty-eight percent left (many in fear of
retaliation by their own brethren, the Arabs), without ever seeing an
Israeli soldier. The ones who stayed were afforded the same peace,
civility, and citizenship rights as everyone else.

Earlier, I receive this interesting E-mail from Gausie, whom I squelched over twelve months ago, as I thought his posting generally abusive about me, and equally abusive to others, when he disagreed with them. I saw no reason to be observant of what I saw, as deliberate attempts to be unpleasant.

A short time ago, I received the E-mail below from him, suggesting that I had made veiled threats to other BB posters.


I am not aware of making any such threatening remark, within the last twenty years or so, but I am interested to know, if anybody has felt personally threatened by any of my postings, on this thread, or any other Moneyam thread.


If so, and you draw my attention to such, I will reconsider the remarks.


However, I consider the content of the E-mail (see below), is deliberately unpleasant and abusive and is covertly threatening.


It seems to me that some posters are intolerant to views, or opinions, which do not concur with their own.

I wonder what the intentions of the E-mail was and whether others have received similar.

One can see why there is so much violence in the world.


(Of course, my opinion is not necessarily correct.)

========================================


This email has been sent via the MoneyAM Website (http://www.moneyam.com)


To reply to this email you will need to go to the MoneyAM Bulletin Boards
and click on the name of the user that sent you this email and then click
the 'message button'.


The following message was sent by Gausie:
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/profile.php?user=Gausie

-------------------------------------------------------------------------




You're a tosser.



I suggest you don't make veiled threats to other BB posters. What goes
around comes around.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to change your contact options, please visit your profile at
http://www.moneyam.com/profile.php

Oh Nick (fred), the martyr rolling his eyes heavenwards going for the sympathy vote with his beatific smile.
I have to agree with the first line of that email. Actually that's quite polite. considering.
I don't know if you have made veiled threats, oh holy one, as I said I haven't looked at all your excrement.

As for haymaker, you are entitled to your opinions but Israel does not look one hundredth as ridiculous as you do.

As for fahel, he's just a fully paid up member of the propaganda machine.

yuff, is, as always, correct.
Poor West Bank economy, booming and expanding at 8% per year now that their government is trying to tackle extremism and concentrating on their people's economy and welfare............that's the untold story.

"The ones who stayed were afforded the same peace, civility, and citizenship rights as everyone else."

Are you certain that the above is true?

It is strange that others disagree.

who disagrees ?

fahel:

as head of the US Central Command General David Petraeus testified before Congress in March this year.

"Because Israel controls our Congress, the president is essentially powerless to confront the forces that manoeuvre behind the scenes to thwart any US government, Republican or Democrat, from moving towards a just and balanced resolution of the Israel-Palestinian conflict."

They way you have edited this makes it appear as though this statement was made by General Petraeus. He said no such thing. The statement was made by William A Cook.

Your manipulation of this already rabid anti-Israeli piece is beneath contempt but sadly typical of your ilk.

Withdraw, Sir.

Withdraw, Sir.

Isn't that what the actress allegedly said to the bishop?

:o)

No it was Fred talking to Gordon.

No, that was "Bend over further please, Sir".

Up pops our Hil and it all gets smutty. ;-)

Hilary, another one of you little phantasies!

Your really do have such a fantastic imagination.

Why don't you hold Issacs's hand and help him out?

Have "fun" together.

"Withdraw, Sir.

Isn't that what the actress allegedly said to the bishop?"

Bit out of date, that.
It's what the choir boy said to the priest.

Nick,
Well at least she has an imagination and wit (new word for you, check it out on dictionary.com) and doesn't regurgitate propaganda and hatred like you and your two camp followers.

There seems to be a suggestion that Gordon Brown is homosexual......that's not a crime anymore, so leave him alone.
Just like Sarah does.
No wonder she always has that pained expression on her face.

Wasn't it what the boy said to the Rabbi?

Could well be ! :)

fahel-fact not fiction.

90th ANNIVERSARY OF THE SAN REMO CONFERENCE

Granting the right under international law for Jews to settle anywhere in western Palestine - the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea


On the 24-25 of April 2010, the European Coalition for Israel conducted a number of educational seminars delivered by Eli Hertz from the United States and Solomon Benzimra from Canada . It was followed by a ceremony held in San Remo at the same house (Villa Devanche) where the signing of the San Remo declaration took place in 1920.


The event attracted politicians as well as grassroots activists from around Europe, the U.S., and Canada. Member of Knesset and Deputy Speaker Danny Danon also attended and delivered greetings from Jerusalem.


At the conclusion of the commemoration, the following statement was released:


"Reaffirming the importance of the San Remo Resolution of April 25, 1920 - which included the Balfour Declaration in its entirety - in shaping the map of the modern Middle East, as agreed upon by the Supreme Council of the Principal Allied Powers (Britain, France, Italy, Japan, and the United States acting as an observer), and later approved unanimously by the League of Nations; the Resolution remains irrevocable, legally binding and valid to this day.


"Emphasizing that the San Remo Resolution of 1920 recognized the exclusive national Jewish rights to the Land of Israel under international law, on the strength of the historical connection of the Jewish people to the territory previously known as Palestine.


"Recalling that such a seminal event as the San Remo Conference of 1920 has been forgotten or ignored by the community of nations, and that the rights it conferred upon the Jewish people have been unlawfully dismissed, curtailed and denied.


"Asserting that a just and lasting peace, leading to the acceptance of secure and recognized borders between all States in the region, can only be achieved by recognizing the long established rights of the Jewish people under international law."


The outcome of the declaration gave birth to the "Mandate for Palestine," an historical League of Nations document that laid down the Jewish legal right to settle anywhere in western Palestine, a 10,000 square-miles the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.


Fifty-one member countries - the entire League of Nations - unanimously declared on July 24, 1922:


"Whereas recognition has been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country."


Jews are in the Land of Israel as of right and not on sufferance.


It is important to point out that political right to self-determination as a polity for Arabs, was guaranteed by the same League of Nations in four other mandates - in Lebanon and Syria [The French Mandate], Iraq, and later Trans-Jordan [The British Mandate].


Any attempt to negate the Jewish people's right to Palestine-Eretz-Israel, and to deny them access and control over the area designated for the Jewish people by the League of Nations is a serious infringement of international law.

:)

The San Remo treaty specifically notes that "nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" - but says nothing about any "political" rights of the Arabs living there. And that is the problem. The Palestinians were not sunsulted. It was just decided by Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan. the US were just observors. It was a political stitch up and the Palestinians should be free to ignore it.

Never let facts get in the way of opinions LOL

Some people are quick to condemn Israel for alleged breaches of international law, but "Palestinians should be free to ignore it."
Why is that then? Because Israel is a nation mainly of Jews?

Galloway-esque and Livingstone-esque
Anti-semitism has many masks, but they always slip.
Now you can plainly see people for what they really are!

ITLB

You make a good point.

Right up to the bit where you wreck it again with your reds under the bed paranoia.