Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


greekman - 28 Jun 2006 12:16 - 17424 of 27111

Angusrjy,

Where did you see the change of date mentioned.

angusrjy - 28 Jun 2006 12:20 - 17425 of 27111

I saw it on my TD Waterhouse account under key dates, it said 29th June last week and now it says 30th June

greekman - 28 Jun 2006 13:18 - 17426 of 27111

Thanks for that Angusrjy,

Reading between the lines re the change of date for the interims. If the delay was because of bad news, I would have thought it would be dodgy to say the least to delay such news. Hopefully, the 1 day delay could be down to wanting to release certain details that perhaps are not quite ready, such as contracts etc. Or yes it may be due to a more mundane reason. Not putting on the rose tinted glasses, just my thoughts on record.

simon102 - 28 Jun 2006 14:07 - 17427 of 27111

Anyone know why the Share Price has changed and is know 8.18p etc instead of the usual fractions of 8.25, 8.5 etc?

PS The Shares will now shoot up because I have sold all mine!!!!! Always happens!!

Simon

kimoldfield - 28 Jun 2006 14:27 - 17428 of 27111

Simon, it is to test the Stock Exchange computers, they are getting ready to cope with the MASSIVE increase in share price now you have sold yours :o)
kim

angusrjy - 28 Jun 2006 14:40 - 17429 of 27111

Hope so Greekman, like you say it would be more against stock exchange rules to hold back bad news rather than good I hope.

Biscuit - 28 Jun 2006 14:48 - 17430 of 27111

Hang on Simon, you've just sold all yours and now you choose to post here?? Hmmm

greekman - 28 Jun 2006 15:45 - 17431 of 27111

Simon,

It's just a more accurate measure of the mid show price, as previously for example ( as I'm sure you noticed ) if the ask was 10p with the bid 9.5p, the mid would sometimes show the ask price and other times show the bid price. So this more refined system shows a truer mid price. It sometimes shows my portfolio close in a better light, although in true monetary terms it makes not one jot of difference.

Oilywag - 28 Jun 2006 15:48 - 17432 of 27111

Afternoon all

Some idle musings from the umpire's chair.

I have long hoped that the share price would actually reflect what is going on in the market and agree that should be expressed as it is now. Before it was largely artificial and almost at the whims of the MM.

Web site. Yes it is a big improvement on what existed before, but it can still be better. A lot of people on this thread have argued that a web site is not an essential tool for SEOs existence.

SEO are supposedly at the cutting edge of a vast and growing transformation in the packaging industry and are hopefully trying to convince as many people as possible of the huge benefits their products will bring to their public image and their bottoms lines. They cannot see all their prospects and, therefore, a bright and informative and properly functioning web site is their shop window to their future prospects and to educate the world generally.

As to why the web site has been upgraded now is open to conjecture given that the management have said repeatedly that they have better things to do than fiddle with a web site. The fact that they have thought that this is not important in the past, IMO reflects badly on SEOs managements business nous.

It is my suspicion that the major companies in the US that they are talking nay negotiating with may have said that they need to have a better web site. Without it SEO to me appears to be a two bit company with little awareness as to the importance of corporate image and brand development and management. I know some will disagree with me, but in defence of my opinion, look at the major business to business companies who are very strong in this area.

This brings me to another point. Take a close look at Stanelcos corporate logo. If you did not know what the word "S T A N E L C O" said, would you, in a split second glance, be able to decipher what the name says? NO! As examples, look at the logos of First Direct, M&S and Orange. SEO's logo looks as though a plumber has welded a few bits of pipe together and then placed the letters too close together. It looks like a bit of out of date art deco design!

Sorry to go on about this, but how does the corporate logo convey anything to anyone about what the company does? Cant they change it so that it reflects SEOs business of protecting the environment, a mainstream issue all around the world?

I am wearing a bullet proof vest against the firepower of those who strongly disagree with opinions above. Hopefully some will agree well with me on at least one or two points above.

Finally, my thought on why the Interims appear to have been delayed by a day. Surely it is because they are signing a major deal with a major company on Thursday and wish to announce it with the Interims?!?!

The oily one

PS Football A house in the Sahara desert has got more chance of being hit by an iceberg than England have of winning the World Cup if they continue to dish up the rubbish they have up until now. I think that they are scared of success. Lets hope, and I do, that Im wrong. And SGE is as passionate and demonstrative and a garden gnome on mogadom. A touch of the Stuart Pearce wouldn't go amiss. He seems totally incapable of directing the strategy on the field as most managers do as a one year old is of conducting an orchestra in Wagner's Ring.

greekman - 28 Jun 2006 16:36 - 17433 of 27111

Oilywag,

Fully agree. Although the quality of a companies products are their most vital asset, image can be almost as important, especially early on. As you say, a web site is the modern shop window to the world.

Biscuit - 28 Jun 2006 16:39 - 17434 of 27111

There it is again 16.38/39 another large buy. Same time for the past 3 nights.

G D Potts - 28 Jun 2006 18:33 - 17435 of 27111

oooooo.

explosive - 28 Jun 2006 19:51 - 17436 of 27111

You sure biscuit??? The 350,000 one......

driver - 28 Jun 2006 20:03 - 17437 of 27111

Accumulation 1.8m Shares

28/06/06 16:39 8.3 350,000
27/06/06 16:38 8.2 500,000
26/06/06 17:38 8.5 925,925
26/06/06 17:38 8.5 925,926

greekman - 29 Jun 2006 10:17 - 17438 of 27111

It looks like those punters who were in for a quick buck have now gone. Trade numbers have been low over the last few weeks, indicating to me that most of those left are steady and static with their SEO shares.
Will be very interesting to see if there is a flurry of activity pre close due to the interims tomorrow.

robinhood - 29 Jun 2006 11:18 - 17439 of 27111

interesting write up in shares mag today

garyble - 29 Jun 2006 11:19 - 17440 of 27111

Well, less than 20 hours before we get to find out where we're going with this!

If this is a leaky company as many have said, then I'd assume from the sp movement and trades that either the interims are relatively neutral or the company is not as leaky as some think.

I certainly hope to see:
1: Statement of the first commercial GS placement
2: Progress/deal with wrap 100
3: progress with WM
4: Statement on ASDA exclusivity {extension or termination}
5: Biotec capcaity improvement
6: Starpol sales volumes {current and anticipated}

These should hopefully all be positives.

garyble - 29 Jun 2006 11:23 - 17441 of 27111

Robinhood,

What was the gist of the shares mag commentary?

nyleve - 29 Jun 2006 12:14 - 17442 of 27111

garble - A 5th of Shares Mag readers own SEO shares.
The jury is still out over whether SEO will rally and make a good investment. Future looks exciting, with you know who interested.
Greenseal way behind schedule.
Prob be 2008 before SEO see profit.
At mo it is intriguing 84 mil prospect and could yet prove a ten-bagger.

Like me, hang on in there !!!!!! sweat it out lol

nyleve - 29 Jun 2006 12:18 - 17443 of 27111

P.S. Can't all go pear shaped ! Can it ?????

Dave
Register now or login to post to this thread.