The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Damm!..I thought Scotty had shot you..I had two thousand volunteer witnesses e-mail to give Scotty an alibi and say they were with him the night it happened!

Just to say I am surprised you are not bones from the other channel..just like you hes another popular fellow over there!

Bones was always long on these and a staunch supporter and a "long term holder" back in the old days ... he come to his senses now then tabby ?

I cant remember thatif he was in from the beginning he should know when mdx is good value. I did!.and I do guess he got it all wrong?.I dont think he is Mr. Popular anymore.

Bones was a huge bull of these (as were far more people back then!), but he did eventually gave up if I remember and saw better opportunities elsewhere. He's not been wrong obviously! ;-))

Scottie lost his gun or his bullet. Whatever. Someone wishing me dead on a financial BB has never been a life-changing event for me, I'm afraid. Eventually everyone realises there's 2 sides to the coin. I've seen a few come and go, but I suspect Scottie's lurking. Maybe he's been talking to Bones. LOL!

If you bad mouth mdx on adv.. and bones did! they send out the Mafioso after you. I admit they are slightly cranky over there.but loyal cranks! Al surely it would have been life-changingif Scotty had shot you?

Judging by his absence I think he might be doing his shooting from the ether somewhere!

This was put on Meldex International's website yesterday:-

04 August 2008
Meldex International, the specialty pharmaceutical and healthcare company, announce that they have engaged Buchanan as their financial investor relations partner with immediate effect. The Company has announced previously a new communications strategy and believe that Buchanan's expertise and knowledge of the sector will benefit Meldex moving forward.

Better watch out for RNS releases that look even more bullish then. The last one didn't work too well. ;-0

IMHO the root problem is that this Co cannot say something simple - "like it is"....This latest RNS is gilded with extra information that adds nothing to the simple message:
"Buchannan is doing PR for Meldex international."

Look at the extra padding:-
-specialty pharmaceutical and healthcare company,
they have engaged
their financial investor relations partner with immediate effect.
The Company has announced previously
new communications strategy
and believe that Buchanan's expertise and knowledge of the sector
will benefit Meldex
moving forward.

Even MDX is hardly likely to engage a PR company that doesn't have the skills needed - Er, although it seems they had, up to today!
-Most of those statements are nothing more than "puff" - adding nothing to the basic message:

"We're using a new PR outfit."

When MDX can stop waffaling and report solid financial news, good or bad, accurately and promptly....then things will improve without any additional "expertise" . . . . . . . the Market needs facts, not waffles.

Did this RNS come from the new PR outfit? . . . . . Oh no!

Hangon, just to clarify, the Buchannan thing wasn't an RNS, it was under 'latest news' on Meldex's webstite home page. Perhaps they want to keep it quiet! ;o)

Hangon, the whole world talks like that. Once it's started eneryone has to pad out even the most simple remark in order to expedite their positive position in the market place to deter negatoid attitudes that may negate the populuses inherant belief that they are acting in the shareholders best interests to disguise their self serving behaviour and promote their true sincerity blah, blah, borrocks.

Hangon, the whole world talks like that. Once it's started eneryone has to pad out even the most simple remark in order to expedite their positive position in the market place to deter negatoid attitudes that may negate the populuses inherant belief that they are acting in the shareholders best interests to disguise their self serving behaviour and promote their true sincerity blah, blah, borrocks.

Think about this RT does deals.and very good ones! Just look at the TU.We know for sure he does not want to sell company cheapfact! given timethe skys the limit! SM supposed to deal with products. when he is not swanning about trying to bankroll his very very cheap offerI dont like giving fu**ing guns to the enemy in working time. incidentally in his department we do have problems with dates and deliverywonder why? BM rates SM mmm? and could still be in the shackput into the melting pot Mr.Patel..and you can see that RT has two very difficult jobs onMy gut feeling is... fundamentals are certainly righttug of war the problem!
imho I think the agro is near its end.
Wishbone...i wish i could talk like that...instead of blah, blah, borrocks. good call!

And on a lighter note :)


To Rt Hon David Milliband MP
Secretary of State
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs ( DEFRA )
Nobel House
17 Smith Square
London SW1P 3JR.

Dear Secretary of State,
My friend, who is in farming at the moment, recently received a cheque for 3,000 from the Rural Payments Agency for not rearing pigs. I would now like to know how to join the "not rearing pigs" busineess.
In your valued opinion, what is the best kind of farm not to rear pigs on and which is the best breed of pig not to rear? I want to be sure I approach this endeavor in keeping with all government policies as dictated by the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy. I would prefer not to rear bacon pigs as the Danes seem to have cornered the market on those, however, if these are not the type of pigs you want not rearing I will happily not rear them. Are there any advantages in not rearing rare breed porkers such as Gloucester Old Spots or Saddlebacks, or, are already there too many people not rearing these.
As I see it, the hardest part of this program will be keeping an accurate record of how many pigs I have not reared. Are there any Government or Local Authority courses on this?
My friend is very content with his business. He has been rearing pigs for forty odd years and the best he made on them was 1422.18 in 1968, that is, until this year when he received a cheque for not rearing any.
If I get say, 3000 for not rearing 50 pigs, will I ger 6000 for not rearing 100.
I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to around 4000 pigs not raised in my first year which will mean about 240,000. Then as I become more experienced in farming I plan to become more ambitious, perhaps increasing to, say, 40,000 pigs not reared in my second year, for which I shall expect a cheque for about 2.4 million from your department.
Incidentally, I wonder if I will be eligible to receive tradable carbon credits for all the pigs I have not reared not producing harmful and polutting greenhouse gases?
And another point: These pigs that I plan not to rear will not eat 2000 tons of cereals. I understand that you pay farmers for not growing crops. Will I qualify for payments for not growing cereals to feed the pigs that I do not rear?
I am also considering the "not milking cows" busines, so please send any information you have on that too. Please could you also include the current DEFRA advice on "set aside fields"? Can this be done on an e-commerce basis with virtual fields, of which, I seem to have several thousand hectares.
In view of the above, you realise that I shall be toally unemployed and will of course qualify for unemployment benefits.
You may rest assured that I shall be voting for your party in the next elections.
Yours most sincerely.

lol

WELL I HAVN'T REARED ANY PIGS FOR 50 ODD YEARS, AND I'VE NEVER BEEN PAID FOR IT.

How much do they owe me, makes you want to laugh.

Good to see a more balanced , reasonable and sensible discussion today.

15 minutes. No trades?... Thats a first!

Couldn't agree more Dil :)