The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

And how exactly is the share price being manipulated and by who ?

The guys a looney if you ask me like many other holders of MDX and that is one of the reasons its so easy to make money out of.

That letter is ridiculous, all a bit embarrassing really!

Thanks for that highly informative response share trader.it would be quite interesting to know your last post or comment on this company.mdx is complex!a lot of investors have their own thoughts which we all listen to with interest ...a remark like yours even without a imho.. Is a wastes of spaceDil knows my view and probably 80% of mdx holdersand therefore his comment does not need an answerYour commentyes the weather is not to bad!

tabasco,

Dil "knows the views of probably 80% of mdx holders"?

Does he?

The main threads for MDX are on another site, and I don't see Dil posting there, unless under another name, so how exactly do you know that Dil knows the views of 80% of the holders?

Does he know mine?

Do I hold?

Better ask Dil, or am I one of the 20% he doesn't know?

And how would you know that?

if you really think about it your response is about as silly as that letter!

Sadly people in this society always look for someone else to blame for a setback, rather than take responsibility themselves. That culture is reflected in the letter,where "manipulators" are blamed for a falling SP, rather than people accepting they may have made a bad investment decision, or simply timed their entry point wrongly.

The fact that there are multiple threads receiving around 1000 posts a day on advfn should tell you enough!

And here is a post from the other side backing up my last point perfectly!

Monty Panesar - 10 Aug'08 - 10:31 - 100640 of 100642

The hedge funds when looking at whether to short a share look at the PI/short term trading/CFD positions first. One way they do this is by looking at the number of posts on ADVFN which for MDX is very high.

Share trader.As you well know..I was talking about the people that post on this sitewe wind each other up every day.. your view..which was no view! was a waste of space!.. If you want to talk about adv.. I believe mdx is no1 in the most used charts pop pickers.I would certainly say 80% of those views correspond with manipulation theoryJust to end this silly conversation as you put it.If mdx was a setback in my portfolio I cant wait for the day to come when I get it right!I dont think you could have ever read this site!

tabasco,

Oh dear we have exchanged two posts, and you have made two personal attacks on me, a poster you don't know! Why?

I guess that says more about you, and your comfort in holding MDX, than I ever could!


".I would certainly say 80% of those views correspond with manipulation theory"


So you think because the majority have convinced themselves of something that makes them right?

Or is it as I mentioned above, people cannot take responsibility for their losses, so look for devious outside dark forces to blame, in this case "manipulators" have replaced "shorters", or "EK and his cronies"!

Some of the posts on that thread are embarrassing, but nobody criticises the bull posts, no matter how ridiculous!

If you think the majority of people are always right, you should read the book re the madness of crowds!

Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (Hardcover)
by Charles Mackay (Author)

Ok share traderthank you for putting me wise about mdxI am sure all those that have a holding on this company.. and post on this or any other site now know exactly the position they are in.. courtesy of Mr. share trader.. I cannot remember having a personal attack on you.but you are obviously right againand as for you writing anything of substance..Well of course you didthank you very muchOff to finish The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Kleinthanks all the same.

Tabasco,

I was referring to these comments of yours!

"remark like yours even without a imho.. Is a wastes of space"

"your view..which was no view! was a waste of space!."


Firsty I didnt address you when I made my post 1790, it was a general comment that you chose to reply to.

Second i don't think I have made any comment that merits your personal responses above, to you at any time, but welcome to stand corrected if you can find one.

I won't hold my breath!

First point.you quoted the letter as being ridiculouswas that on behalf of all mdx supporters? You did not say!did you expect a pat on the back.bravoIll pass my fags round
Second point.you gave no reasons for your statementjust ridiculous.. which imho means the quote is a waste of space.so rather than trying to pick people up for the sake of meaningless piffle and talking with forked tongue{not a hedgie are you?}give a proper reason for your quote The letter is ridiculous! I won't be holding my breath!

tabasco,

Any comment I make is clearly my own opinion.

If you had wanted my opinion on why the letter is (IMO) "ridiculous" you could have asked me, and I would have told you. That would have been rather more constructive than snipe at me with personal comments.

I wasn't "picking anyone up for meaningless piffle" those are your words, I simply stated that the letter was ridiculous, and it clearly is, if you read it.

How are you in a position to make a comment like "I am talking with forked tongue"?

Please give me an example of that!

You then ask me "{not a hedgie are you?}" So you are now trying to sublimely suggest I have an an agenda for making my comment!

Quite extraordinary that you are so comfortable holding this stock that you feel the need to attack with such venom a person making a simple comment on a letter written by someone else, and published on another BB!

Read the letter again, not as a holder, and then you will see what I mean, but then, judging by your comments so far, maybe not.

I do hope MDX is not the best example of the contents of your portfolio!

And I hope you understand and have employed some sensible position sizing, rather than make the mistake most small Pi's make, throwing it all into the one stone cold cert "no brainer"!

You could talk all night and not say a thing.so perhaps you are not a hedgie? Maybe of political persuasion?

tabasco,

At least when I talk I don't accuse others of being dishonest, then am unable to back it up when challenged!

The paranoia of bulls of stocks such as MDX is generally born out of many people having too large a position in a high risk stock without actually understanding the risks, then flailing around blaming all and sundry, except themselves, when it goes wrong.

You are a typical BB poster I am afraid, you resort to attacking the poster because you are unable to debate the issue!

Plenty of people on this site debate we also have a laughyour first remark..that letter is ridiculous is not a debate!it is a remark from a person that has not the slightest interest in the companyat that point I lost interest in you
I can personally see plenty of problems with mdx but not involving fundamentalsthe company have made me a great deal of money in the pastand so I am in love with themthey are about to make myself and others a great deal moreif you have been sent along to derampgo ahead.feel free! There you go debate over!

The letter could be written for many AIM listed companies, you are backing it because it backs up a company you have invested in.

frankly, I think it will be dismissed, there are valid points raised but it is spoiled by an obvious bias towards one stock in particular, rather than the market in general.

Unless otherwise stated surely any comment on here is the opinion of the poster concerned?

AndyI never said I was backing the lettermerely that it highlighted many worrying pointsExcellent postlong but worth a read.I agree in as much as the letter could have been written for a number of AIM listed companiesI feel imho mdx is the best example.

The full story of this company is shrouded my mysticand whilst I back RT at this pointhe must take some responsibility for the lack of clarity shown to us.

Lol been making friends again over the weekend tabby ?

The guy is right , that letter is a load of b*llox .

DilI dont suppose you have even glanced at the letterI know what is coming from youand it is usually crap ishthe other guy wanted a partand he didnt pass the audition

Yes I did tabby , then came to the conclusion that the guy was probably a loony and the letter is a load of b*llox (see my previous post just after your copy and paste from advfn).

Asked a question too but got no answer from you.

Dilwe have had the SP manipulation debate so many timescan we just beg to differ? For those that have an interest in mdx and the SPI thought the letter would be worth a read.nothing more nothing less!