Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

share trader - 10 Aug 2008 11:43 - 1795 of 8631

tabasco,

Oh dear we have exchanged two posts, and you have made two personal attacks on me, a poster you don't know! Why?

I guess that says more about you, and your comfort in holding MDX, than I ever could!


".I would certainly say 80% of those views correspond with manipulation theory"


So you think because the majority have convinced themselves of something that makes them right?

Or is it as I mentioned above, people cannot take responsibility for their losses, so look for devious outside dark forces to blame, in this case "manipulators" have replaced "shorters", or "EK and his cronies"!

Some of the posts on that thread are embarrassing, but nobody criticises the bull posts, no matter how ridiculous!

If you think the majority of people are always right, you should read the book re the madness of crowds!

Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (Hardcover)
by Charles Mackay (Author)

tabasco - 10 Aug 2008 12:25 - 1796 of 8631

Ok share traderthank you for putting me wise about mdxI am sure all those that have a holding on this company.. and post on this or any other site now know exactly the position they are in.. courtesy of Mr. share trader.. I cannot remember having a personal attack on you.but you are obviously right againand as for you writing anything of substance..Well of course you didthank you very muchOff to finish The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Kleinthanks all the same.

share trader - 10 Aug 2008 13:12 - 1797 of 8631

Tabasco,

I was referring to these comments of yours!

"remark like yours even without a imho.. Is a wastes of space"

"your view..which was no view! was a waste of space!."


Firsty I didnt address you when I made my post 1790, it was a general comment that you chose to reply to.

Second i don't think I have made any comment that merits your personal responses above, to you at any time, but welcome to stand corrected if you can find one.

I won't hold my breath!

tabasco - 10 Aug 2008 13:51 - 1798 of 8631

First point.you quoted the letter as being ridiculouswas that on behalf of all mdx supporters? You did not say!did you expect a pat on the back.bravoIll pass my fags round
Second point.you gave no reasons for your statementjust ridiculous.. which imho means the quote is a waste of space.so rather than trying to pick people up for the sake of meaningless piffle and talking with forked tongue{not a hedgie are you?}give a proper reason for your quote The letter is ridiculous! I won't be holding my breath!

share trader - 10 Aug 2008 14:07 - 1799 of 8631

tabasco,

Any comment I make is clearly my own opinion.

If you had wanted my opinion on why the letter is (IMO) "ridiculous" you could have asked me, and I would have told you. That would have been rather more constructive than snipe at me with personal comments.

I wasn't "picking anyone up for meaningless piffle" those are your words, I simply stated that the letter was ridiculous, and it clearly is, if you read it.

How are you in a position to make a comment like "I am talking with forked tongue"?

Please give me an example of that!

You then ask me "{not a hedgie are you?}" So you are now trying to sublimely suggest I have an an agenda for making my comment!

Quite extraordinary that you are so comfortable holding this stock that you feel the need to attack with such venom a person making a simple comment on a letter written by someone else, and published on another BB!

Read the letter again, not as a holder, and then you will see what I mean, but then, judging by your comments so far, maybe not.

I do hope MDX is not the best example of the contents of your portfolio!

And I hope you understand and have employed some sensible position sizing, rather than make the mistake most small Pi's make, throwing it all into the one stone cold cert "no brainer"!

tabasco - 10 Aug 2008 14:23 - 1800 of 8631

You could talk all night and not say a thing.so perhaps you are not a hedgie? Maybe of political persuasion?

share trader - 10 Aug 2008 20:06 - 1801 of 8631

tabasco,

At least when I talk I don't accuse others of being dishonest, then am unable to back it up when challenged!

The paranoia of bulls of stocks such as MDX is generally born out of many people having too large a position in a high risk stock without actually understanding the risks, then flailing around blaming all and sundry, except themselves, when it goes wrong.

You are a typical BB poster I am afraid, you resort to attacking the poster because you are unable to debate the issue!

tabasco - 10 Aug 2008 21:33 - 1802 of 8631

Plenty of people on this site debate we also have a laughyour first remark..that letter is ridiculous is not a debate!it is a remark from a person that has not the slightest interest in the companyat that point I lost interest in you
I can personally see plenty of problems with mdx but not involving fundamentalsthe company have made me a great deal of money in the pastand so I am in love with themthey are about to make myself and others a great deal moreif you have been sent along to derampgo ahead.feel free! There you go debate over!

Andy - 11 Aug 2008 08:17 - 1803 of 8631

The letter could be written for many AIM listed companies, you are backing it because it backs up a company you have invested in.

frankly, I think it will be dismissed, there are valid points raised but it is spoiled by an obvious bias towards one stock in particular, rather than the market in general.

Unless otherwise stated surely any comment on here is the opinion of the poster concerned?

tabasco - 11 Aug 2008 08:56 - 1804 of 8631

AndyI never said I was backing the lettermerely that it highlighted many worrying pointsExcellent postlong but worth a read.I agree in as much as the letter could have been written for a number of AIM listed companiesI feel imho mdx is the best example.

The full story of this company is shrouded my mysticand whilst I back RT at this pointhe must take some responsibility for the lack of clarity shown to us.

Dil - 11 Aug 2008 09:29 - 1805 of 8631

Lol been making friends again over the weekend tabby ?

The guy is right , that letter is a load of b*llox .

tabasco - 11 Aug 2008 09:52 - 1806 of 8631

DilI dont suppose you have even glanced at the letterI know what is coming from youand it is usually crap ishthe other guy wanted a partand he didnt pass the audition

Dil - 11 Aug 2008 11:50 - 1807 of 8631

Yes I did tabby , then came to the conclusion that the guy was probably a loony and the letter is a load of b*llox (see my previous post just after your copy and paste from advfn).

Asked a question too but got no answer from you.

tabasco - 11 Aug 2008 12:01 - 1808 of 8631

Dilwe have had the SP manipulation debate so many timescan we just beg to differ? For those that have an interest in mdx and the SPI thought the letter would be worth a read.nothing more nothing less!

Dil - 11 Aug 2008 12:08 - 1809 of 8631

It aint being manipulated tabby , only in the minds of the loonies does it appear to be.

tabasco - 11 Aug 2008 12:47 - 1810 of 8631

Dil you live in Wales where a sheep is a sheep.in the City we would be made to believe a sheep is a woolly dog.
According to the FSA, there were "informed price movements" -- potentially a sign of insider dealing -- around 28.7 percent of all merger and acquisition announcements involving FTSE 100 companies last year, up from 28.6 percent in 2006 and 23.7 percent in 2005... Who gives a fu*k about the AIMFSA have arrested eight recentlycant be for manipulating prices"Heavens to Murgatroyd!" everyones honest.ask Dil he knows a sheep when he sees one

Dil - 11 Aug 2008 13:19 - 1811 of 8631

lol

Andy - 11 Aug 2008 20:34 - 1812 of 8631

this was posted on advfn, and I hope it's a joke and wasn't really sent to the LSE or FSA.



Thank you for your email

I should be grateful for more specific information regarding your
suspicions of manipulation including details of the specific
transactions you believe to be manipulative.

Kind regards

The Market Abuse Team

-----Original Message-----
From: XX
Sent: 04 August 2008 18:38
To: Market Abuse
Subject: Meldex International

Dear Sirs

no doubt you have had many emails re the above company. Well as an
investor I am sick of your terrible lack of power. I am writing to my
local MP immediately and having this matter discussed. This company is
being totally manipulated as you sit and watch

I look forward to a better than standard reply

tabasco - 12 Aug 2008 07:53 - 1813 of 8631

Morning all.Andyis there such a section called The Market Abuse Team or The PI Abuse Team there certainly should be!. Unfortunately cant own up to it being my masterpiecethe skill and judgment needed to exercise in how the issues both legal and factual are presented are way above my level.sorry!

Andy - 12 Aug 2008 08:19 - 1814 of 8631

tabasco,

It is sad when people, in some caes without much investment experience, (judging by some of the posts on ADVFN), have become so convinced they are right that they begin to complain to the authorities when the position moves against them.

IMO there has been a general sell off of AIM listed stocks for quite a whie now, and amongst some of the reasons I see for this are; fund redemptions, CFD's closing, margin calls on leveraged positions, and general selling as people lose faith with the market., or need the money for something else.

MDX is a stock mostly owned by PI's rather than institutions, so I would expect more volatility, and I would imagine many people are using margin here, then I would expect increased volatility.

I think what you have to consider is why nobody complains when shares are rising "exuberantly"?



Register now or login to post to this thread.