The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Ok share traderthank you for putting me wise about mdxI am sure all those that have a holding on this company.. and post on this or any other site now know exactly the position they are in.. courtesy of Mr. share trader.. I cannot remember having a personal attack on you.but you are obviously right againand as for you writing anything of substance..Well of course you didthank you very muchOff to finish The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Kleinthanks all the same.

Tabasco,

I was referring to these comments of yours!

"remark like yours even without a imho.. Is a wastes of space"

"your view..which was no view! was a waste of space!."


Firsty I didnt address you when I made my post 1790, it was a general comment that you chose to reply to.

Second i don't think I have made any comment that merits your personal responses above, to you at any time, but welcome to stand corrected if you can find one.

I won't hold my breath!

First point.you quoted the letter as being ridiculouswas that on behalf of all mdx supporters? You did not say!did you expect a pat on the back.bravoIll pass my fags round
Second point.you gave no reasons for your statementjust ridiculous.. which imho means the quote is a waste of space.so rather than trying to pick people up for the sake of meaningless piffle and talking with forked tongue{not a hedgie are you?}give a proper reason for your quote The letter is ridiculous! I won't be holding my breath!

tabasco,

Any comment I make is clearly my own opinion.

If you had wanted my opinion on why the letter is (IMO) "ridiculous" you could have asked me, and I would have told you. That would have been rather more constructive than snipe at me with personal comments.

I wasn't "picking anyone up for meaningless piffle" those are your words, I simply stated that the letter was ridiculous, and it clearly is, if you read it.

How are you in a position to make a comment like "I am talking with forked tongue"?

Please give me an example of that!

You then ask me "{not a hedgie are you?}" So you are now trying to sublimely suggest I have an an agenda for making my comment!

Quite extraordinary that you are so comfortable holding this stock that you feel the need to attack with such venom a person making a simple comment on a letter written by someone else, and published on another BB!

Read the letter again, not as a holder, and then you will see what I mean, but then, judging by your comments so far, maybe not.

I do hope MDX is not the best example of the contents of your portfolio!

And I hope you understand and have employed some sensible position sizing, rather than make the mistake most small Pi's make, throwing it all into the one stone cold cert "no brainer"!

You could talk all night and not say a thing.so perhaps you are not a hedgie? Maybe of political persuasion?

tabasco,

At least when I talk I don't accuse others of being dishonest, then am unable to back it up when challenged!

The paranoia of bulls of stocks such as MDX is generally born out of many people having too large a position in a high risk stock without actually understanding the risks, then flailing around blaming all and sundry, except themselves, when it goes wrong.

You are a typical BB poster I am afraid, you resort to attacking the poster because you are unable to debate the issue!

Plenty of people on this site debate we also have a laughyour first remark..that letter is ridiculous is not a debate!it is a remark from a person that has not the slightest interest in the companyat that point I lost interest in you
I can personally see plenty of problems with mdx but not involving fundamentalsthe company have made me a great deal of money in the pastand so I am in love with themthey are about to make myself and others a great deal moreif you have been sent along to derampgo ahead.feel free! There you go debate over!

The letter could be written for many AIM listed companies, you are backing it because it backs up a company you have invested in.

frankly, I think it will be dismissed, there are valid points raised but it is spoiled by an obvious bias towards one stock in particular, rather than the market in general.

Unless otherwise stated surely any comment on here is the opinion of the poster concerned?

AndyI never said I was backing the lettermerely that it highlighted many worrying pointsExcellent postlong but worth a read.I agree in as much as the letter could have been written for a number of AIM listed companiesI feel imho mdx is the best example.

The full story of this company is shrouded my mysticand whilst I back RT at this pointhe must take some responsibility for the lack of clarity shown to us.

Lol been making friends again over the weekend tabby ?

The guy is right , that letter is a load of b*llox .

DilI dont suppose you have even glanced at the letterI know what is coming from youand it is usually crap ishthe other guy wanted a partand he didnt pass the audition

Yes I did tabby , then came to the conclusion that the guy was probably a loony and the letter is a load of b*llox (see my previous post just after your copy and paste from advfn).

Asked a question too but got no answer from you.

Dilwe have had the SP manipulation debate so many timescan we just beg to differ? For those that have an interest in mdx and the SPI thought the letter would be worth a read.nothing more nothing less!

It aint being manipulated tabby , only in the minds of the loonies does it appear to be.

Dil you live in Wales where a sheep is a sheep.in the City we would be made to believe a sheep is a woolly dog.
According to the FSA, there were "informed price movements" -- potentially a sign of insider dealing -- around 28.7 percent of all merger and acquisition announcements involving FTSE 100 companies last year, up from 28.6 percent in 2006 and 23.7 percent in 2005... Who gives a fu*k about the AIMFSA have arrested eight recentlycant be for manipulating prices"Heavens to Murgatroyd!" everyones honest.ask Dil he knows a sheep when he sees one

lol

this was posted on advfn, and I hope it's a joke and wasn't really sent to the LSE or FSA.



Thank you for your email

I should be grateful for more specific information regarding your
suspicions of manipulation including details of the specific
transactions you believe to be manipulative.

Kind regards

The Market Abuse Team

-----Original Message-----
From: XX
Sent: 04 August 2008 18:38
To: Market Abuse
Subject: Meldex International

Dear Sirs

no doubt you have had many emails re the above company. Well as an
investor I am sick of your terrible lack of power. I am writing to my
local MP immediately and having this matter discussed. This company is
being totally manipulated as you sit and watch

I look forward to a better than standard reply

Morning all.Andyis there such a section called The Market Abuse Team or The PI Abuse Team there certainly should be!. Unfortunately cant own up to it being my masterpiecethe skill and judgment needed to exercise in how the issues both legal and factual are presented are way above my level.sorry!

tabasco,

It is sad when people, in some caes without much investment experience, (judging by some of the posts on ADVFN), have become so convinced they are right that they begin to complain to the authorities when the position moves against them.

IMO there has been a general sell off of AIM listed stocks for quite a whie now, and amongst some of the reasons I see for this are; fund redemptions, CFD's closing, margin calls on leveraged positions, and general selling as people lose faith with the market., or need the money for something else.

MDX is a stock mostly owned by PI's rather than institutions, so I would expect more volatility, and I would imagine many people are using margin here, then I would expect increased volatility.

I think what you have to consider is why nobody complains when shares are rising "exuberantly"?

If I received that email, it would be consigned to the "Piss Poor English" folder, and ignored.... no doubt the FSA (bless 'em) would've done the same.....