bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 13:39
- 19799 of 27111
If that is the time frame for FDA approval for Starpol 3000 then it will come just after SEO runs out of cash.
Oilywag
- 13 Sep 2006 13:44
- 19800 of 27111
aldwickk
I know that they are testing Starpol 3000 in the US as we speak and my research says that they have been going well.
The oily one
garyble
- 13 Sep 2006 15:24
- 19801 of 27111
With regard to FDA approval of Starpol 3000, the AGM statement alludes to approval whilst the Interim statement confirms awaiting approval. I therefore surmise that submission must have been somewhere between the two dates whereby the 120 day countdown would have commenced:
AGM statement 2nd May 2006:
"As announced on 14 February 2006, Starpol 2000 now has the relevant US FDA approval, along with its European equivalent. Starpol 3000 is expected to be confirmed as fully compliant under the same regulation and we expect approval in turn for this within weeks"
Interims 14th July 2006:
"Starpol 2000 selling successfully into US marketplace and Starpol 3000 awaiting food contact approvals......
....Starpol 2000 (biodegradable material) has been accredited full food contact approval from European and US regulatory bodies and is selling in the US market. Development of Starpol 3000 (100% sustainable and biodegradable) is complete. Similar food contact approvals are being sought......
......As announced on 14 February 2006, Starpol 2000 now has the relevant US FDA approval, along with its European equivalent. Starpol 3000 is expected to be confirmed as fully compliant under the same regulation and we expect approval in turn for this within weeks......"
dawall
- 13 Sep 2006 15:42
- 19802 of 27111
Starpol 3000 approval, whenever it comes, will have absolutely no impact on the share price UNLESS its is acompanied by firm and substantial orders. I have held a substantial number of these unfortunately for the last 2 years and admit to being sucked in by the blatant lies and misleading RNSs from their management. The world is talking up green issues and the environment big time at the moment but that does not automatically guarantee them a slice of the pie. My view is that they have f---ed up completely and cannot see who would want to provide any further funding. I guess they have 8 weeks or so to pull a rabbit out of the hat before cash goes. Cannot see institutions funding them, I also cannot see a rights issue being succuessful since I and many others would not poor good money after bad. Also does anyone know if the White trust fund which holds approx 23% of shares can afford to support a big rights issue?
I know SEO management claim to have the best product but if that's the case why aren't big companies buying it / signing up? Why haven't shareholders been told the truth about Greenseal, still no orders despite all trials apparently being complete, why why why???
I have now written my holding off with very heavy losses and put this down to experience. I think some one some time ago on this BB suggested once you sold shares you could really take a clear view of them. I agree and having thought about it the last few days have come to the conclusion that basically the SEO management are a bunch of incompetent lying wankers!
dawall
- 13 Sep 2006 15:43
- 19803 of 27111
Starpol 3000 approval, whenever it comes, will have absolutely no impact on the share price UNLESS its is acompanied by firm and substantial orders. I have held a substantial number of these unfortunately for the last 2 years and admit to being sucked in by the blatant lies and misleading RNSs from their management. The world is talking up green issues and the environment big time at the moment but that does not automatically guarantee them a slice of the pie. My view is that they have f---ed up completely and cannot see who would want to provide any further funding. I guess they have 8 weeks or so to pull a rabbit out of the hat before cash goes. Cannot see institutions funding them, I also cannot see a rights issue being succuessful since I and many others would not poor good money after bad. Also does anyone know if the White trust fund which holds approx 23% of shares can afford to support a big rights issue?
I know SEO management claim to have the best product but if that's the case why aren't big companies buying it / signing up? Why haven't shareholders been told the truth about Greenseal, still no orders despite all trials apparently being complete, why why why???
I have now written my holding off with very heavy losses and put this down to experience. I think some one some time ago on this BB suggested once you sold shares you could really take a clear view of them. I agree and having thought about it the last few days have come to the conclusion that basically the SEO management are a bunch of incompetent lying wankers!
StarFrog
- 13 Sep 2006 16:06
- 19804 of 27111
dawall - commiserations. I see you feel so strongly about this that you felt it worth repeating repeating.
LOL
garyble
- 13 Sep 2006 16:12
- 19805 of 27111
Dawall,
These are indeed trying times, and possibly the darkest hour.....who knows?!
IF they are finalising a couple of contracts, and IF the contracts are for say a minimum of 60,000 tonnes pa. of Starpol, there should be a step-change in the SP as they should be able to put some meat on the bone in the ensuing RNSs.
It has taken at least 9 months to get to the stage of signing a couple of contracts for the MMPs, so in the grand scheme of things I don't believe it has been totally cocked up, but the management has shown itself to be somewhat green, but so have some investors.
IF SEO survives the next 4 weeks, it should go on to deliver on its promises.
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 18:07
- 19806 of 27111
Don't worry about a rights issue not being taken up, Thatwittalan and the lemmings who follow him will buy them.
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 18:25
- 19807 of 27111
It may come as a shock to you, but some people, not you obviously, have a mind of their own. It may also come as a shock to you that some people can read the simple phrase "I would not recommend anyone to buy into these" that I have put on many posts.
It may come as a shock to you, that others do their own research and make up their own minds.
It will come as no shock to anyone that your magnificent mastery of repartee goes no further that little boy name calling and that once again you manage to post without a hint of any research or input onto the subject, that you have no agenda anywhere except to cause as much trouble as possible, try against all the odds to be superior to everyone else, and resort to the silly little infants device of name calling.
It will also come as no shock to anyone who frequents these boards, or any others that I really could not care less what you or anyone else may think. Everyone is free to read what is written, make up their own mind, do their own research and, for all I care, decide to put all their money wherever they want. Just as I do with mine. If you have something to say about the share, that is worth saying and not simply repeating something you read on an AOL sainsburys blog, then say it. If you wish simply to badmouth people, wait until tomorrow and you can do it in the playground with your chums.
Life is too short to be bothered with inbred little ignoramous like you, so if you post something that is relevant, fine. If not, than i shall happily ignore it and let everyone else work out what most people already know about you.
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 18:28
- 19808 of 27111
For everyone else;
I think it is now safe to say that the mysterious post close trades we have seen for the last 3 days is someone selling off. The share price movement makes me fairly certain of that, in my own mind, but what do other (sober) posters think?
Alan
tweenie
- 13 Sep 2006 18:51
- 19809 of 27111
Being a stupid lemming, i'll have to agree with you.
But theen again WTFDIK, as i'm soooo stupid (with my own money) I still hold loads of these shares.
:o)
antofelli
- 13 Sep 2006 18:51
- 19810 of 27111
Nothing has changed, but every day we get closer to the finance call but as well the contracts that we know "are being finalised" and other positive targets. Being long for a long time and never been scared by the trader mentality. When the traders knock the price down I see that as a buying opportunity. I know the traders had big margins on seo so far because of the uncertainty wich surrounds seo`s negotiations. I`m confident pretty soon that uncertainty will be all cleared off.
halfamil
- 13 Sep 2006 20:41
- 19811 of 27111
Alan. Couldn't agree more. Non holders just knocking for fun. What mentality would cause someone to visit a share thread that they don't hold? It amazes me. I think the imminent contracts will follow the official green light for Starpol 300, then things will move very quickly.
Either that or the Board are a gang of crooks who are risking a prison sentence.
Seems unlikely.
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 21:24
- 19812 of 27111
hewittalan6 ,
He trys so hard to be witty and clever, but in fact he is only a pompous self opinionated little man, the Captain Mainwaring of moneyam. what a wanker.
Oilywag
- 13 Sep 2006 21:33
- 19813 of 27111
adwickk
What a very well reasoned, intellectually superior and rational post!
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 13 Sep 2006 21:35
- 19814 of 27111
Evening Oily!!
About those trades. Sells, d'you think??
Alan
explosive
- 13 Sep 2006 21:48
- 19815 of 27111
Aquasol still looks like its doing well.......
Oilywag
- 13 Sep 2006 21:53
- 19816 of 27111
Evening Alan
Really don't know. Interactive had all of the large trades at close this week as buys. I think somebody with level two would have a better idea.
The oily one
aldwickk
- 13 Sep 2006 22:27
- 19817 of 27111
Stanelco PLC
Daily Commentary
Our system posted a SELL CONFIRMED today. The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago, when the stock price was 3.6500. Since then SEO has fallen -4.66% .
SELL-IF is confirmed by a black candlestick with a higher open and a lower close. The selling price is taken as the previous close ( 3.6500 ) according to the Rules of Confirmation.
The recent bearish pattern leading to the SELL-IF signal is confirmed today. The market is poised for bearish action. Though the market opened higher today, the days activity created a black candlestick that closed below the previous close. This is one of our valid bearish confirmation criteria.
The slight failure of the previous BUY signal is currently confirmed, too. We closely monitor the performance of the signals, but a few shots missing the target slightly are inevitable when you deal with the stock market. However, such signal failures are more unlikely for higher rated stocks.
We hope that you sold this stock . Probably you realized a small loss but it is better to cut the losses short. Your important benchmark today was the previous close. You were supposed to watch the session carefully, feel its bearish tendency despite the higher opening and sell your shares after making sure that the prices stay below the previous close.
If you sold, keep away from this stock until the confirmation of a new BUY-IF signal unless there is not an emergency warning. What to do if you did not already sell? Maybe, you did not have time to follow the session or you simply delegated the delicate job of confirmation to us. Well, it is a bit late, but not too late. You may still find suitable prices for selling your shares in the following sessions.
The market is an inviting one for short-sellers. Risk lovers may now go for short sale. The market is already moving on the side of shorts ignoring the confirmed bullish patterns.
oblomov
- 14 Sep 2006 07:23
- 19818 of 27111
aldtwit,
'The previous BUY recommendation was made on 11.09.2006 (2) days ago'
What has changed behind the scenes in two days to turn this to a sell from a buy?
I stopped looking at British Bulls a long time ago - automated, no human input, rubbish.
I'll stick my neck out and say the SP will close slightly higher than it opens today.