Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

mnamreh - yes, as a matter of fact I do believe the reports that come from the CST. They are a professional and well balanced organisation, with official and open connections to the various UK and european police forces, and openly co-operate with MI5 and Mossad over terrorism incidents and risk and with the Home Secretary over anti-semitic incidents.

Oh I would stick to this thread for a true reflection of what is happening.

Everybody should believe the real "truth".

.

CST reports are objective, they don't exaggerate and they don't indulge in hysterical behaviour.

ITLB - please either enable your MAMail or drop me a mail with your contact details (click on the envelope icon next to my name)

Are you inviting me to join the Anti-fred Orchestrated Progressive Coalition?
Would that make it unanimous amongst all MAM posters?

You can contact me at:

http://www.specialistmossadgroupforterminationwithextremeprejudice.il

Today, apparently, is 'Everybody draw Mohammed' day.

Is this sort of behaviour, deliberately taunting moslems, despicable and retrograde? Or is it free speech?
Linkie

bringing back hanging and flogging i say ..... or swamp the board with recipes!

I think that religion and religious icons should be held up to ridicule. I think being offended is over rated. There should be freedom to offend people. I saw Vince Cable on question time some weeks ago and even he said almost exactly the same thing. The reform of the House of Lords and the removal of Lord Bishops should help in the trend to a secuilar sociatey. People who believe in spernatural being with no evidence should be offended even more regularly.

It is good to be so definite about yourself and opinions and what is right for others.

Or, perhaps, is it another delusion, a substitute false belief, another over valuation of yourself, or another false belief about yourself?

Anti-Zionist Jewish Protestors

A group of Orthodox Jews protest against Zionism when a hatefull SOB confronts them and raises his own blood pressure. Hope he had a heart attack later that day!

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e988c36604

Hays,

Perhaps, you should stick to copying an pasting recipes.

.

Fred
I don't mind people believing in paranormal beings. I don't mind them practising their 'faith'. They just don't deserve any special treatment any more then people who believe in UFOS, ghosts, that the earth is flat or other such silly nonsense. We shouldn't be giving their schools special tax treatment or their 'churches' (churches include temples etc). We are heading towards a secular society and the sooner the better. Organised religion is one of the most damaging influences in the world at the moment and has been for thousands of years.

"I don't mind people believing in paranormal beings. I don't mind them practising their 'faith'. They just don't deserve any special treatment any more then people who believe in UFOS, ghosts, that the earth is flat or other such silly nonsense. We shouldn't be giving their schools special tax treatment or their 'churches' (churches include temples etc). We are heading towards a secular society and the sooner the better. Organised religion is one of the most damaging influences in the world at the moment and has been for thousands of years. "


Got to completely agree with that.
The problem is that some people "need" religion and because it is so embedded in so many different cultures it can only wither slowly without positive governmental action.
Roll on a secular society where religion has zero connection to the state and doesn't financially bleed or twist and distort society and social policy.

Religious schools only perform better because they are preselecting their pupils from parents who see education as important. They are not better schools per se.

Is the latter true of Private Schools and the Parents' schools, which Cameron is, presently, so enthusiastic about at the moment.

Probably, the enthusiasm will be gone tomorrow.

Yes. It is also true. I have one son who attends a well known public school, the other gores to a state school. The cleverist pupils ate the state school are certainly cleverer than those at the public school. There are several boys who have grade A at A level two years earlier than normal. However the schooling at the public school is of a higher standard generally with virtually every teacher from Oxbridge. The schooling is more rounded with a huge range of activities. Thye have extensive playing fields, which Labour councils sold off years ago. They have their own swimming and diving pools plus many other facilities.

It would be interesting to reverse the roles of teachers, ie place the teachers from the public schools into state schools for a year and vice versa. My money would be on the exact same results in both schools, matters not one jot where teachers are educated. Until proper discipline is re-introduced into state schools above average pupils will always suffer due to distractions from pupils who don't want to be there. Teachers in public schools have a captive audience one would hope :o)