for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

.....and there it is 1.5m buy

The question it raises is why a 25200 buy needs to be a worked trade. Is the stock that illiquid??? And if so, what are the consequences of such illiquidity?
Alan

Well I guess that answers my question re the lack of trades showing.

I suspect we will see more after the close

just bought 391k

oblomov
Is that you topping up with those millions.

anybody know why my buys of almost 550k are not showing on the trades page?

Because your name is "sellsell"

The oily one

LOL !

Sellsell,

Probably being held back to show added to other buys. This i think is what happened earlier, for reasons often only known to the market.

You havin' a laugh, driver? (He's havin' a laugh!).

oblo
LOL! LOL! LOL!!!

Have a go at this great fun.
http://chir.ag/stuff/sand/

Not all buys show up here - I bought 1m last week in 2 tranches and they never showed at all. I think some brokers use another exchange.

Plusmarkets.

Plusmarkets.
http://www.plusmarketsgroup.com/details.shtml?ISIN=GB0005814198

Just an odd thought from today, while out'n about.
Could the LOIs contain a condition of SEO securing certain funding levels to be able to see through their commitments under any JV agreement?

This would give reason to the present silence and lack of a closure to them. If this is so presemably the announcements of any MMFs can only be made after (or during!!) the EGM - ignoring any SPhere complications.

Or possibly be dependent on the FDA approval.

So I guess non of us know and SEO ain't telling.
Well I've paid my monies and made my choice.
Time to bury my head in the sand again and wait.
:-)

Tony - thats is also my take - but Alan has a valid point - so it could be dependent on both

Reading the prospectus (again) I'm going with plan A.
It clearly states the fundraising will be used to ensure the successfull completion of at least the first 2 manufacturing plants.
Not might be could be or may be, but will be. Given the tone of a prospectus that lays it on thick about the potential risks, this seems pretty clear to me.
If it will be, but the LOI and contracts are now not able to be talked about, that suggests the finance issue is the key. If it said the funds would hopefully or probably or possibly be used for it I would not be so certain. If the risk factors listed said they may not get contracts for the plants I would have questions.
So I'll stick with finance being the key.
Alan