bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
greekman
- 24 Oct 2006 16:59
- 21805 of 27111
Sellsell,
Probably being held back to show added to other buys. This i think is what happened earlier, for reasons often only known to the market.
oblomov
- 24 Oct 2006 17:02
- 21806 of 27111
You havin' a laugh, driver? (He's havin' a laugh!).
driver
- 24 Oct 2006 17:14
- 21807 of 27111
oblo
LOL! LOL! LOL!!!
Have a go at this great fun.
http://chir.ag/stuff/sand/
bhunt1910
- 24 Oct 2006 17:28
- 21808 of 27111
Not all buys show up here - I bought 1m last week in 2 tranches and they never showed at all. I think some brokers use another exchange.
zscrooge
- 24 Oct 2006 17:48
- 21809 of 27111
Plusmarkets.
driver
- 24 Oct 2006 17:51
- 21810 of 27111
Tonyrelaxes
- 24 Oct 2006 22:37
- 21811 of 27111
Just an odd thought from today, while out'n about.
Could the LOIs contain a condition of SEO securing certain funding levels to be able to see through their commitments under any JV agreement?
This would give reason to the present silence and lack of a closure to them. If this is so presemably the announcements of any MMFs can only be made after (or during!!) the EGM - ignoring any SPhere complications.
hewittalan6
- 24 Oct 2006 23:36
- 21812 of 27111
Or possibly be dependent on the FDA approval.
waveydavey
- 24 Oct 2006 23:39
- 21813 of 27111
So I guess non of us know and SEO ain't telling.
Well I've paid my monies and made my choice.
Time to bury my head in the sand again and wait.
:-)
bhunt1910
- 25 Oct 2006 07:40
- 21814 of 27111
Tony - thats is also my take - but Alan has a valid point - so it could be dependent on both
hewittalan6
- 25 Oct 2006 08:53
- 21815 of 27111
Reading the prospectus (again) I'm going with plan A.
It clearly states the fundraising will be used to ensure the successfull completion of at least the first 2 manufacturing plants.
Not might be could be or may be, but will be. Given the tone of a prospectus that lays it on thick about the potential risks, this seems pretty clear to me.
If it will be, but the LOI and contracts are now not able to be talked about, that suggests the finance issue is the key. If it said the funds would hopefully or probably or possibly be used for it I would not be so certain. If the risk factors listed said they may not get contracts for the plants I would have questions.
So I'll stick with finance being the key.
Alan
Tonyrelaxes
- 25 Oct 2006 10:37
- 21816 of 27111
It could also explain the Board following this funding despite the considerable dilution. In the case of AoR, 12% of an ultimately huge Market Cap is better than 23% of a tiny one.
But this takes me back to wanting to know AoR's intentions, not so much of the 'rights' offer but the 'institutional and other investors' (sorry, not exact terminology but I did'nt lug the prospectus away with me, Aerofart's Excess baggage rates are $15/k !)
rpaco
- 25 Oct 2006 10:38
- 21817 of 27111
Having been involved with LOIs in the automotive components industry I can tell you that they CAN mean virtually nothing. They are always stuffed full of conditions and normally end by saying they do not form part of any legal or binding commitment.
rpaco
- 25 Oct 2006 10:46
- 21818 of 27111
Another thought for the future, when you are paying by the Kilo for your non re-cyclable rubbish to be collected every 2 weeks. Consumers will not want bio degradable packaging, they will want only recyclable materials eg. plastics marked 1 or 2, or paper, card, foil etc. Bio degradable will go in landfill and consumers will be paying for it to be taken away. The supermarkets will come under a lot of pressure as soon as charging by weight is introduced by your wonderfull local gestapo (oops sorry I meant council).
Mad Pad
- 25 Oct 2006 11:09
- 21819 of 27111
Rpaco,or just throw it on thier compost heap.
bhunt1910
- 25 Oct 2006 11:15
- 21820 of 27111
I notice that the share price seems to be holding around the current price.
Now if you were an instition that had bought zillions of shares at 0.8p - wouldn't you be unloading them now so as to get an immediate 50% profit, OR is it just possible that they know they will get a 100% profit or greater by holding - because they have seen the proposed deals and potential of future contracts.
Just a thought
robinhood
- 25 Oct 2006 11:32
- 21821 of 27111
rpaco: this issue already discussed at length on this board. Fact is that it will be biodegradable, is competitively priced and is green (regardless what councils may charge -and they may well come under pressure in the future to make concessions on landfill charges if biodegradable waste is involved)
hewittalan6
- 25 Oct 2006 13:25
- 21822 of 27111
garyble
- 25 Oct 2006 13:37
- 21823 of 27111
BH1910,
The institutions who have signed up to zillions of shares cannot trade them yet!
bhunt1910
- 25 Oct 2006 13:41
- 21824 of 27111
Maybe not officially - but surely if they really wanted to they would just borrow thaam and short it
Or are you saying that it would be a condition of the sale ??