bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
EWRobson
- 08 Jan 2007 12:22
- 23164 of 27111
boldtrader Suggest you don't bait the breath. May be under water for some time. But may resurface in second quarter. I think right to hold at current level but I also see time to get back in. I am hoping that we might get a moderately encouraging RNS or, perhaps more likely, indications of progress with prelims (last year were 28th February). This could lead to a buying opportunity at lower risk. Well, that's my theory; currently funds seem to be better employed elsewhere. So, good luck to long term holders and otehr interested parties.
Eric
cynic
- 08 Jan 2007 12:37
- 23165 of 27111
you bait a hook with a maggot, or in BB terms, ramp a share with questionable info (ask maestro; he's an expert!) ...... you hold bated breath!
stockdog
- 08 Jan 2007 13:53
- 23166 of 27111
cynic - quite agree. "Baited breath" sounds somewhat halitotic?
EWRobson
- 08 Jan 2007 14:34
- 23167 of 27111
'haliotis' would be better for SEO!
boldtrader
- 08 Jan 2007 15:00
- 23168 of 27111
OK boys,I,m just an uneducated boy done half well from the North,if i had been fully educated,most probably would never have put my cash into SEO!! Still never mind,baited or bated cheers to you lot too.
Paperbackwriter
- 08 Jan 2007 15:34
- 23169 of 27111
I'm still here... hanging on....praying.....
Oilywag
- 09 Jan 2007 08:06
- 23170 of 27111
'Morning all
Somebody posted a mention that Biopac in Australia seemed to using Stanelco's products.
I e-mailed them and this was the reply I received this morning.
Interesting!!
The oily one
Hi ,
Thank you for your enquiry. At the current time, I am unable to provide you
with information relating to our involvement with Stanelco.
Regards
Richard Fine
BioPak
Enviromentally Friendly Solutions
Level 4 Block D 12-24 Talavera Rd
North Ryde NSW 2060
Australia
M +61 405 016 390
T +612 8877 5959
F +612 8877 5999
E rfine@biopak.com.au
W www.biopak.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: xxxxxxxx@onetel.net
Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 3:20 AM
To: rfine@biopak.com.au
Subject: FEEDBACK FROM WEBSITE
IP Address of Sender: 84.43.xx.xxx
------------------------------------------------
Name :
Email :xxxxxxx@onetel.net
Message :Are you using Stanelco\'s formula for the
manufacture of your starch based biodegradable plastic packaging products?
Thank you in anticipation of your reply.
Regards
xxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------
hewittalan6
- 09 Jan 2007 08:11
- 23171 of 27111
Thanks for sharing, Oily.
I read that as we are working with Stanelco, but cannot say anything.
Surely they could have denied it if they were not.
Alan
garyble
- 09 Jan 2007 09:33
- 23172 of 27111
Still waiting for a reply from SEO with regard to Starpol 3000 FDA approval & Biopak link. Will post reply if it is of any use.
jimward9
- 09 Jan 2007 11:04
- 23173 of 27111
Oily / Alan
Or, we might be infringing their patents and had better check, or they are infringing one of our's, get me our legal dept !!!!!
oblomov
- 09 Jan 2007 11:08
- 23174 of 27111
Dont mention Patents Jim - I did it once and world war three almost broke out!
garyble
- 09 Jan 2007 13:58
- 23175 of 27111
"Biopak has released an all new fully compostable and biodegradable packaging film material with food contact approval.
This revolutionary new packaging film material is based on a blend of starch and PLA and is certified as biodegradable. This material is also certified for compostability (dependent on material thickness / gauge) to EN:13432 and DIN CERTCO standards"
Has a familiar ring to it......doesn't it!
tweenie
- 09 Jan 2007 14:30
- 23176 of 27111
the ring of..................
more jam tomorrow.
Still , patience is a virtue.
:-)
oblomov
- 09 Jan 2007 15:18
- 23177 of 27111
It has been very quiet from SEO since they got the 14m + - can we be sure the management haven't disappeared with the dosh to live a life of luxury in South America or some such haven for those so inclined?
Shouldn't 14m = activity = news (especially news of the deals that were imminent in early September)?
Why do I have the feeling I've been had?
cynic
- 09 Jan 2007 15:18
- 23178 of 27111
long term patients tend to become corpses
dawall
- 09 Jan 2007 15:45
- 23179 of 27111
Oilywag I wouldn't read anything into the comment you got from Aust. To me that reads I don't know, can't be bothered (or too busy) to find out and I don't intend to. If they were involved with SEO they would know and there would be no good reasons from keeping this info. hidden. If SEO have gone chasing small Aust. companies whilst US and ASDA are still up in the air and not sorted I would be pretty pissed off.
A more likely Australian scenario is that Wagner and Warner are spending the winter sunning themselves on some Australian beach having just successfully shafted everyone for 14m. This would also explain the deadly silence. If anyone lives near Southampton It might be worth going to the office to check if any lights are still on and casrs in the car park.
Me, well I'm off to the boat show to see what I could have bought had SEO not fucked up big time!
bosley
- 09 Jan 2007 16:08
- 23180 of 27111
dawall,
"Me, well I'm off to the boat show to see what I could have bought had SEO not fucked up big time! "
funniest post of the year so far !! as the great jim bowen used to say, " let's take a look at what you could've won . "
hewittalan6
- 09 Jan 2007 16:41
- 23182 of 27111
Keep the suntanned bird with the lithe limbs in a tiny bikini aboard a yacht in the Med.
I'll go with an investment in Jam Futures anyday.
Did I really just think that?
Shit, I'm getting old.
greekman
- 09 Jan 2007 17:06
- 23183 of 27111
Alan
Who needs the boat????