bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
garyble
- 12 Jan 2007 09:14
- 23201 of 27111
Did you know.....It has been 262 DAYS or 37 WEEKS since this announcement:
"Stanelco Plc (SEO LN) jumped 1.5 pence, or 12 percent, to 14.5 pence. The share rose as much as 12 percent after the company said it has overcome the last obstacles to bring its Starpol 3000 biodegradable packaging material to market and is in talks with potential licensees"
oblomov
- 12 Jan 2007 10:33
- 23202 of 27111
And did you know...... it has been 126 days or 18 weeks since THIS announcement (in a RNS):
"Further to the trading update on 17 August 2006, the Company is continuing to
negotiate with the two parties with which it signed letters of intent to
compound Starpol resin for the US market, and contracts are in the process of
being finalised."
oblomov
- 12 Jan 2007 10:40
- 23203 of 27111
And did you also know that ....... on the Frogpack website it says:-
How To Buy FrogPack
Exclusive UK Manufacturer:
Merlin Packaging
www.merlinpackaging.co.uk
Authorised Distributors:
Merlin Packaging
Lightning Packaging Ltd
http://www.lightningpackaging.co.uk/
But there is no mention of Frogpack on either the Merlin Packaging or Lightening Packaging website. I wonder if they know they're the exclusive manufacturers and distributors.
tweenie
- 12 Jan 2007 11:23
- 23204 of 27111
and did you know this is SEO were talking about........
They've promised the world 'tomorrow' and delivered nothing but greenhouse gases to date.
What exactly did you expect?
Surely not for this company to be open and honest in it's news releases to joe public.
LOL or I'd cry.
:-)
greekman
- 12 Jan 2007 12:21
- 23205 of 27111
Oblomov.
I wonder if one of those BBC investigative pro grammes could be interested. It might be one of those where a reporting investigator goes round to the registered office and finds a !Gone away! sign pinned on the door and then finds out it's a mail drop only, with all directors living in Spain, under assumed names.
The lack of updates re this company when aforementioned dates or time periods are reached is becoming farcical.
In my opinion the Directors of this company are not carrying out their duties to shareholders.
oblomov
- 12 Jan 2007 12:59
- 23206 of 27111
I agree totally with your last sentence Greek.
Most here seem willing to just except it though. I think its disgraceful that a company can make the kind of statements mentioned above, in RNS's, and then fail to say why the 'imminent deals' and 'potential licensees' didn't happen.
I also wonder if several of the posters here actually exist - are they part of the illusion - Probably, Sylvia is sitting in a grand villa in Spain making all these posts and pretending the company exists! Eric, Alan, Baz and Oily dont really exist.
I may even be a figment of her imagination!!!!
bhunt1910
- 12 Jan 2007 13:10
- 23207 of 27111
sylvia definitely exists - but not at SEO any more, I think I exist - certainly about a stone heavier than before Xmas - and I know that most of oily exists - Eric & Alan I have not actually met - but there have been photos of him with various golfing trophies - which leaves Alan. Now theres an enigma ???.and as for Oblo - well !!!
I expect we will all meet up at the famed 50p party ??
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2007 13:13
- 23208 of 27111
Shouldn't the party be at 20p given the dilution of equity?
Oilywag
- 12 Jan 2007 13:21
- 23209 of 27111
No Eric, 10p party, but that's after a 1 for 10 consolidation.
Oh btw this is not me scribbling this message, its my hologram .... or should I say horrorgram?
The oily one
Oilywag
- 12 Jan 2007 13:24
- 23210 of 27111
Oi you Bazza, what do you mean "most of oily exists"? If only part of me exists, is the rest of me that doesn't, consist of dark matter?
The oily one
hewittalan6
- 12 Jan 2007 13:33
- 23211 of 27111
And as my middle name is Heisenburg, I might exist and I might not.
If you want me I'll be feeding Schrodingers cat.
Alan
waveydavey
- 12 Jan 2007 13:55
- 23212 of 27111
sent to seo this am
Is there any chance that this side of bankrupcy you will see fit to update shareholders re greenseal , starpol 2000/3000/wrap 100 or the potential clients with which you were pursueing contracts and imminant deals........
Whilst I expect nothing other that a lame standard response, I and other investors who have shown nothing but patience with the mismanagement of our investment would like an update, soon as opposed to promises of future success on a time scale of seo's own creation where 'imminant' can could so easily be infinite and potential clients/partners substituted for out of a hat.
await for your reply .
Regards a peeved shareholder.
Might I suggest we all take out our fustrations on seo.
You never know. If nothing else, several dozen e-malis might elicit some response
EWRobson
- 12 Jan 2007 15:12
- 23213 of 27111
I would suggest leaving tham alone! We are, I believe in a new, cautious, keep-it-close-to-chest (KICTC), Schroders advised era. Better not to have any news until there is something real to report than the old era of feeding scraps to the dogs. Hopefully they will be occupying their time talking to prospective clients and closing contracts rather than investors. Better for us to set the alarm for 1st April and hibernate; then we might have a few hours of cloud-cuckoo land before realising our foolishness.
garyble
- 12 Jan 2007 15:58
- 23214 of 27111
I'm even hoping that they've started to build the MMPs and IF as they stated, it would only take 6 months to build and commission {I seriouosly doubt}, then that would fall nicely in time to be announced with the finals!
tweenie
- 12 Jan 2007 16:04
- 23215 of 27111
Whilst my heads with EW my hearts with WAVEY.
Please post the LAME reply. LOL
I'm sure they'll get back to you imminently or at least by the time S'pol 5K goes on trial.
:-)
Role on April
Lets hope that April 2007.
zscrooge
- 12 Jan 2007 16:06
- 23216 of 27111
Better for us to set the alarm for 1st April
Cue gag..no better not.
oblomov
- 12 Jan 2007 16:20
- 23217 of 27111
If they'd saved up all their RNS's and put them out on April 1st we'd have known where we stood - a tad misleading to have put them out at any other time.
You can hibernate, Eric, but I want something for my 50K and I enjoy a moan - thats not too much to ask, is it? lol
garyble
- 12 Jan 2007 18:48
- 23218 of 27111
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/opa-fcn.html
Just noticed that the FDA website has just been updated to December 2006 and still no mention of SEO or its sibsidiary FCN, so I guess one of the following holds:
1) Starpol 3000 does not need FDA approval
2) Submission for FDA approval must have occurred after August 2006
3) There was a problem with the submission and had to be re-submitted
4) Complete failure
Place your bets please?
garyble
- 12 Jan 2007 18:49
- 23219 of 27111
BASF howver seem to be smokin!
automatic
- 12 Jan 2007 21:11
- 23220 of 27111
Did you know.....It has been 262 DAYS or 37 WEEKS since this announcement:
And did you also know that ....... on the Frogpack website it says:-
sent these to SEO,left garyble and oblomove names off, have asked for an update, don't suppose for one minute i will get one.