bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
123456
- 08 Feb 2007 13:11
- 23545 of 27111
garden or no garden it makes nodifrenc we all just wont to put our garbage in the bin with out damaging the planet is asda nuts all the stores sell lose veg and other products what do you put them in the bags they supplie andthat wont change
you can not go back in time but you can change the future
PS they may be right lets all start composting grow all our own and they will lose a fortune i dont think so andis everybody going to take a big sack with them when they go shoping
Fred1new
- 08 Feb 2007 14:00
- 23546 of 27111
What a lot of old rubbish.
8-)
EWRobson
- 08 Feb 2007 15:23
- 23547 of 27111
Fred, I see you are having a rest! Do you always sleep with your eyes open?
|-)
tweenie
- 08 Feb 2007 17:13
- 23548 of 27111
From PM's (for all his faults -many- the site is good for info to dyor on) site, bio air pillows on sale and seems to have positive interest (nothing on seo's own webite)and pulseline being pushed in japan. Also another interesting and viable patent granted.
...................and yet still no update from the new management.
Is this the new masochistic style of running a company?
;-0 hurt me, hurt me............but not in the pocket, thankyou.
waveydavey
- 09 Feb 2007 11:55
- 23549 of 27111
Death by a 1000 sp slashes??????
PATISEAR
- 09 Feb 2007 23:20
- 23551 of 27111
Still looking forward, and positive.
Bought 500,000 @1.15. [150,000 + 350,000]
boldtrader
- 10 Feb 2007 08:23
- 23552 of 27111
Glad to hear that patisear,Wish I had free funds available.I believe SEO are slowly advancing. Contracts soon ? !!! Cheers.
hewittalan6
- 10 Feb 2007 09:14
- 23553 of 27111
After dropping 80% of my holding I am now maintaining a watching brief for the right moment.
Alan
Fred1new
- 10 Feb 2007 09:45
- 23554 of 27111
H^, to sell or buy?
bhunt1910
- 10 Feb 2007 11:14
- 23555 of 27111
http://www.ptonline.com/articles/200702fa1.html
Discussion on producing PLA - including SEO
hewittalan6
- 10 Feb 2007 12:32
- 23556 of 27111
Buy. Probably. Who knows.
Let us see what news is forthcoming and make a decision on that.
EWRobson
- 10 Feb 2007 14:07
- 23557 of 27111
Not much of a chartist but they look pretty stable (including MACD and RSI). Not far off a support level at around 110p. The recent attempt to take off, possibly caused by clearance of a stock overhang (FT report), shows what could happen if (when) there is good news. Notice from Shares that Howard White has had his attention focussed elsewhere for some time so good riddance from SEO viewpoint. The history of sp is bound to leave negativity in people's minds, but, accepting that we are now in a new institution-controlled era, this would be a good time to buy in, being prepared to wait some time (say, 3 months or so) before positive news. Cap. around 35m is not that low but should be covered by value of intellectual property anyway whilst, if they cannot exploit that themselves, they would be a natural for a takeover contest.
Eric
cynic
- 10 Feb 2007 16:26
- 23558 of 27111
eric ..... it might be helpful if you inserted say 25 and 50 dma ...... i suspect you will not be much impressed by that picture
boldtrader
- 10 Feb 2007 16:29
- 23559 of 27111
Honest,Straight forward and to the point Eric,Thanks. I ask the question are you buying back in? SEO do now look a("no brainer") promising proposition.Not many months ago the cap was 300m give or take,if we DO sign a chunky contract or two we could travel back up there.Most of the hard work is apparantly finished,commercialistion must be the next step,and snippits of news are filtering through about several of the SEO products reaching the end user. The patented intellectual property is also in place.
I need to buy afew more myself to recieve the full impact of any rise,but after the roller coaster ride I have endured(6 years),alittle nervous to do so!that and the fact I have no free funds just now,will have to dig deep!
It.s great to read level headed posts,the fact that many SEO investors are down on this stock is no excuse for some to shout abuse on the bulletin boards.You pay your money, you take your chance. Good luck to you and all holders, Cheers.
EWRobson
- 10 Feb 2007 18:28
- 23561 of 27111
cynic Don't see the logic. The 25 and 50 dma are just catching a trend. We should probably ignore the latest hiccough, a case of jumping the gun. The 25dma has been following a flat trading pattern for some time while the 50 dma has been approaching it. I agree that there is a balance between buyers ansd sellers at the 110 to 115p level and therefore a question as to which way the break might be. On the chart alone, you would suspect up because otherwise we would be in new (recent) ground. This would match my reasoning above from a fundamentals viewpoint which is saying that there won't be any news until it is positive! You must then guage the possibility of negative news driving the price lower because this points to the risk in the investment. Can't put a percentage on that but I would describe that risk as 'quite low'.
Boldtrader. I am very much like you at the moment. As a result of capital demands the free/risk capital is quite low and I am using it to try and build up a cfd fund where I anticipate the upward move is reasonably close. For interest, I have taken profits on ASOS and switched into AZM and JR. (Just Retirement). The latter is still on an upward trend and I am looking for the moment for a switch into SEO (probably) - I think I have time. AZM, in my view, will explode upwards this year, the question is when: but I wouldn't want to be out at the time. Sorry to be off topic.
Eric
cynic
- 10 Feb 2007 18:46
- 23562 of 27111
EWR .... as you probably know, i don't care for this company at all, but follow the thread sporadically somewhat out of curiosity ..... i do not follow charts slavishly, but as i have mentioned elsewhere, they tend to be self-fullfilling ..... my gut feeling is that putting money into SEO is foolhardy ..... from the little i have seen, the management is poor, does not live up to promises, and seems no closer to securing any contracts than it was say a year ago ..... the sp performance shows that the market is generally in agreement.
as for the supermarkets, their primary objective is greater profits and/or increased margins ..... thus, if they can save money by eliminating packaging they will also keep the environmentalists happy ...... it looks to me that so-called "green packaging" is not in itself any cheaper than the current stuff used; indeed, it will probably cost more (such is the way of things) ...... perhaps they'll start selling re-usable strong paper carriers and bags ..... they can then claim that they are encouraging us all not to throw away stuff unnecessarily, and even if it is, then it is bio-degradable or recyclable ...... did i hear them mention that they would also find this a profitable exercise?
EWRobson
- 10 Feb 2007 20:37
- 23563 of 27111
cynic I suspect you have to do some homework on bio-degradable packaging, and R/F sealing. Drivers thread is a good place to start: click on address in header. The frustrating thing is that they have hit the nail foursquare on the head but can't do the marketing.
cynic
- 10 Feb 2007 21:09
- 23564 of 27111
at the end of the day, you have to ask yourself if the company can or will ever deliver .... i don't think it can or will ..... you put your cash there if you wish; i shan't