bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
oblomov
- 30 May 2007 23:01
- 24574 of 27111
alfalfa
- 30 May 2007 23:37
- 24575 of 27111
Who are Stanleco ? Surely not an impending metamorphosis !
oblomov
- 31 May 2007 00:09
- 24576 of 27111
The articles by Ahmed ElAmin - thats not one of your pen names is it, Greek?
Oilywag
- 31 May 2007 07:26
- 24577 of 27111
Well what crass inefficiency of the hack who wrote the article. Can't even get the company's name right!!
The oily one
Mad Pad
- 31 May 2007 07:56
- 24578 of 27111
Good old FT yesterday,re Sanelco "cashstrapped",and "The shares reached a high of allmost 30p soon after the company floated 2 years ago ..".You might have thought they would have got it right.Oily you still here ,just for old times sake?
Tonyrelaxes
- 31 May 2007 08:02
- 24579 of 27111
I recall he got it wrong a year or so ago. Someone here rang him to correct things. The author lives in the south if France - it must be the sun.
Mad Pad
- 31 May 2007 08:11
- 24580 of 27111
Tony I spoke to him it must be the sun with a name like that you don't drink the wine!
tweenie
- 31 May 2007 09:25
- 24582 of 27111
lol
hangon
- 31 May 2007 10:03
- 24583 of 27111
Greekman has a fair point.
- Tell me why is the LSE/FSA so insistant on getting paperwork right and being a general pain when BB's chirp up....when the real culprits are trying to run companies like it was their second hobby?
Shouldn't execs have to explain what they contribute each year..to the shareholders at the AGM?....SEO's was a shambles this year with no real information of any use IMHO.
It's difficult to imagine that there isn't "some value" in most companies - provided it is still able to breathe - what appears to happen is these execs hope something (like a contract!) will "turn up" and all their problems will be solved.
If this greenseal was not commercial, why didn't someone notice? Is no-one in charge?
Electron - disaster
Marconi - dare not speak the name
SEO - bluster and nothing..... (although their second Patent row should be interesting! ...Let's hope their new Ch Exec is better than the previous one in Court...oops).
Will SEO shuffle off to AIM? - I'm sure Ofex won't have them after this performance...might give Ofex a bad name!
+Any more for the Doom camp?
tweenie
- 31 May 2007 11:41
- 24584 of 27111
can anyone explain why the mcap is now worth less than what bits of seo are worth?
Given that the new management have managed in a week to dessimate the sp, I would have thought they might have put forward grand plans to rebiuld it .
Why have'nt the institutions dumped and run off?
WHAT THE **** is going on?
Very confused.
nyleve
- 31 May 2007 12:04
- 24585 of 27111
Perhaps they have read "Shares" mag and run for the hills !!!!!
cynic
- 31 May 2007 15:52
- 24586 of 27111
in a fire sale, the parts will be worth bugger all
Cantlose
- 31 May 2007 16:12
- 24587 of 27111
.
cynic
- 31 May 2007 16:15
- 24589 of 27111
to take the money for minimal effort!
Oilywag
- 31 May 2007 16:15
- 24590 of 27111
Cantlose posed the question in his/her post above as to whether Elizabeth Filkin was worth the 15,000 we have paid her for the past three years.
This is my answer below.
Value for money?
NO!! And a total waste of space.
The oily one
cynic
- 31 May 2007 16:16
- 24591 of 27111
driver .... the only solace will be that you can count the loss against future CGT
Mad Pad
- 31 May 2007 17:17
- 24592 of 27111
Not in a PEP or ISA because there is no capital gains tax!
cynic
- 31 May 2007 17:20
- 24593 of 27111
in that case, i'm afraid you seem to have done your bollox with no silver lining .... to mix metaphors very badly