Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

aldwickk - 13 May 2013 12:42 - 24928 of 81564

People moaning, 23 years after Thatcher left power, and not one of her policies has ever been reversed: what does that tell you about her getting it right?

ok , the poll tax

But how many of the anti union law's , Labour had 14 years to reverse them

cynic - 13 May 2013 12:53 - 24929 of 81564

indeed, i saw in the papers that one of the labour grandees (shadow cabinet?) said that the unions needed a further spanking

Haystack - 13 May 2013 13:19 - 24930 of 81564

The 'poll tax' was one of the best policies.

Fred1new - 13 May 2013 14:46 - 24931 of 81564

Sounds like all your yesterdays.

Some of the memories are confabulated.

I suppose a little like the present tory coalition.

Not sure who the tories will be able to blame at the next election.

Will it be Heath, or even Maggie (for signature), but I bet it won't be themselves.

The excuses are already be written. (Of course there could be another U-turn.)

What a bunch of schoolboys and "girls".

Haystack - 13 May 2013 15:52 - 24932 of 81564

The school boys and girls are clearly Labour. Ed Miliband still looks like a sixth form perfect. No wonder he is so unpopular with the public and Labour MPs alike. Can he last out until an election?

Shortie - 13 May 2013 16:16 - 24933 of 81564

Clegg, Miliband, Cameron all have one thing in common, the public doesn't trust them. Is Farage really being voted for due to policy? If so then you'd assume people are aware of UKIP's policies, not so. Farage is winning votes because the public trust him more than the other three amigos heading their parties. A reshuffle must come before the next election I think or else.

Haystack - 14 May 2013 09:03 - 24934 of 81564

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22518403

Tories to publish details of draft EU referendum bill

The Conservatives are to publish a draft parliamentary bill to legislate for an in-out referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union to be held by the end of 2017.

Fred1new - 14 May 2013 09:17 - 24935 of 81564

Misuse of public money for torid party needs, comes to mind.


Cameron is a leader being led by his nose.

Fred1new - 14 May 2013 09:23 - 24936 of 81564

PS.

Stupid, but what one would expect of this leadership.

Suggest the tories oust Cameron and his disastrous side kick Osborne and offer the job to Farage or Boris.


Fred1new - 14 May 2013 09:27 - 24937 of 81564

Perhaps he can rely on scapegoating somebody, to divert attention:

Haystack - 14 May 2013 09:31 - 24938 of 81564

It is a good idea. There is no government time available for the bill and the Libs would oppose adding it to the government list. It will have to be introduced as a private member's bill by a back bencher.

The good thing about it is that if the bill is debated and voted on, Labour and the Libs will almost certainly vote against it. This leaves both parties in a very difficult position regarding the electorate. The voters will see these two parties opposing a referendum. The winner in in that situation is going to be the Conservatives.

cynic - 14 May 2013 09:32 - 24939 of 81564

certainly a strong whiff of being panicked into draft legislation, but it sure throws labour into a tizzy, so it's sort of good news, bad news ...... ukip have one of their major planks damaged too, though they'll now rattle on that the referendum should be "next week" instead of after much thought and debate ...... lib/dems are also wrong-footed as they don't want any sort of debate with a potential view to walking out of eu

in sensible circumstances - in politics? hahaha! - i think DC was quite right; try to negotiate an acceptable deal, and only after that, go to referendum or whatever ..... anyway, for whatever reason, his hand has now been forced

TANKER - 14 May 2013 09:50 - 24940 of 81564

over 100 tory MPs concerned about their jobs and so they should load of sheep
we want out of the EU now not in 2017 load of bollocks Cameron and several more MPs familys get millions in land subsides from the CORRUPT EU
building silly wind turbines that to make uses more CO2 than they ever save it is a con on a big scale .build new coal stations now

Haystack - 14 May 2013 10:07 - 24941 of 81564

More nonsense. You can't leave the EU now and it still may not happen in 2017. No Matter how well UKIP does between now and the election, they will not be in government and not even in opposition. If Labour is elected we won't leave and won't get a referendum. The ONLY chance of leaving the EU or getting a better deal with Europe is a Conservative government with a clear majority next time. The rest is a fantasy.

Fred1new - 14 May 2013 10:09 - 24942 of 81564

To call for a vote as on something at a date in the future and what has not been negotiated is risible.

It isn't a plausible route for a split party where the looney right wing will be baying for more.

My guess is that by 2017, with probably a lot of the present "economic" chaos settling down and Europe economies lifting and a movement to greater integration being driven by Germany and France, then there will be a wish by Joe Public in the UK to join in the party.

The financial and political costly reality of being outside the main union, will be brought home to the UK government (of whatever colour) and the voters.

With greater integration and regulation of the Taxation and Financial services etc. from Brussels in association with America, we would be fools to be bystanders.

Cameron, Miliband and Clegg know this, and hence the hesitations, while waiting for the remaining Neanderthals to die out.

--------
Those Neanderthals, relying on primitive drives of xenophobia are being "used" and "manipulated" by Fauxrage.

Haystack - 14 May 2013 10:24 - 24943 of 81564

The reasons you quote above are some of the reasons to leave or change. Why would we want greater integration and regulation of the taxation and financial services? I think you will find that as a referendum approaches, there will be pressure from several EU countries for one as well. But none of this matters to the electorate. They will see very soon that only the Conservative can give them a vote on Europe. There is no realistic possibility of UKIP being able to achieve anything. This EU debate has come along at the right time. It holds the possibility of a strong Conservative victory next time with a big majority. There seems to be a groundswell of feeling that we should return to our original relationship with Europe as a trading partner. The Common Market was a good idea, but the EU is not.

Haystack - 14 May 2013 10:46 - 24944 of 81564

Published today

cynic - 14 May 2013 11:01 - 24945 of 81564

There is no realistic possibility of UKIP being able to achieve anything
Hays - that's a very bold assertion, though come a general election, and the picture may well be different ...... do you happen to know how many seats ukip currently holds in the eu parliament?

hilary - 14 May 2013 11:05 - 24946 of 81564

I'm with Tanker on this. If Cameron's got any sense, he'll wait for a clearer sign of economic recovery and call a snap election with the promise of an in-out referendum asap thereafter. The public don't want to wait until 2017 and why should they?

It's about time for this old chestnut again.

Haystack - 14 May 2013 11:12 - 24947 of 81564

They hold those seats because the MEP elections have proportional voting. It is the lack of PR that stops the Libs getting anywhere and stopped the SDP. UKIP will suffer in the same way. They may do well, but cannot budge the traditional Con and Lab voters. There is a stubborn rump of voters who won't alter their voting choices. In the UK elections are fought over the floating voters. The floating voters are not enough to put a party even into opposition.
Register now or login to post to this thread.