Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

hilary - 24 Jun 2013 10:30 - 26379 of 81564

No planet. It's a statistical fact which can easily be proven using standard economic metrics.

Income inequality always rises during a boom and falls during a recession. It was bad during the Thatcher years, and worse still during the Blair/Brown years. The chart below only goes up to 2009, but the data since shows that the earnings differential between the 10th and 90th percentiles has reduced since Cameron has been in office.

As difficult a pill as it may be to swallow, it's true. CAMERON CARES ABOUT SOCIAL INEQUALITY WHICH HAS LESSENED SINCE THE BULLINGDON BOYS HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE ECONOMY.



Or maybe I'm just winding up the Red Flag Flyers.

Fred1new - 24 Jun 2013 11:07 - 26380 of 81564

PLease extend the chart to 2013.

hilary - 24 Jun 2013 13:39 - 26381 of 81564

That can certainly be arranged upon receipt of the appropriate fee paid in either Swiss francs, Seychelles rupees or Eastern Caribbean dollars.

Fred1new - 24 Jun 2013 14:02 - 26382 of 81564

Which account?

Fred1new - 24 Jun 2013 17:00 - 26383 of 81564

For Manuel,

Seems there is some agreement!

cynic - 25 Jun 2013 07:58 - 26384 of 81564

so a tiresome and boorish ozzy boatrace protester with a pregnant british wife can be deported at the drop of a hat ..... the remainder needs no post or comment!!!!!

TANKER - 25 Jun 2013 08:37 - 26385 of 81564

post above yes the uk justice stinks it is corrupt and run by liars and crooks

Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 08:39 - 26386 of 81564

Manuel,

I know if you really try hard and concentrate you can still read more than one sentence in a row:

Try reading this very brief article.

It summates what I feel is wrong in this government's economic policies and why they should be condemned.

(Hiliary won't believe it.)

Blame austerity, not old people, for the plight of Britain's young


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/23/blame-austerity-old-plight-young-hutton

cynic - 25 Jun 2013 08:53 - 26387 of 81564

fred - we are all aware of what you think is wrong for you never tire of telling and boring us all with it .... however, you have yet to tell us which party (if any) has a better and viable alternative

Haystack - 25 Jun 2013 08:56 - 26388 of 81564

Fred
You need to read more widely. Will Hutton is as predictable as you in his views. He is a great fan of Europe and anything that the Conservatives do is awful. That's all you need to know about him. He is not much of an economist.

ahoj - 25 Jun 2013 09:04 - 26389 of 81564

Hospital costs.

Free NHS for everyone who come to the UK, Some of whom stay in ICU for weeks (minimum £10000 a night), or treat cancer and HIV (costing £40000 to £100000).

Who is in charge??? Noone, I think.

hilary - 25 Jun 2013 09:05 - 26390 of 81564

There's a big clue as to why I take articles like that with a large pinch of salt within the article's URL, namely the bit that says 'commentisfree'.

Mr Hutton is fully entitled to his opinion, but that's all it is - HIS OPINION. He has quoted the minimum amount of facts and, in so doing, has ignored things such as a dumbing down of the education system and immigration effects within his argument. As a result, his writings are biased to the extreme and lack any serious credibility.

You've only got to read some of the other articles written by the man to realise that he's either a Labour activist or that he's a good few cans short of a six-pack or, more probably, both.



samsun - 25 Jun 2013 10:09 - 26391 of 81564

Any one ready to fill it in?

formal-apology.jpg

Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 14:29 - 26392 of 81564

Hand it round. Quiet a few might fill it in.

Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 14:32 - 26393 of 81564

Manuel,

You are becoming repetitive in you old age.

But to save yourself from any discomfort you can always use the button!

==========

cynic - 25 Jun 2013 17:45 - 26394 of 81564

i am well aware that i could squelch you, but why should i pander to you?
i am also very well aware, as are most here, that you are incapable of answering simple questions, so like Sir Robin Day, i shall keep repeating same
as much as anything else, it helps highlight that you are nowt but a caricature of Macbeth's "poor player"

Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 19:03 - 26395 of 81564

Manuel,

If you look you are being repetitious.

I answered your question on numerous occasions in the past and as I don't believe myself to be beholding in anyway to you, Ihave no intentions of satisfying your whims.

What interest me is the show of party allegiance some like Hilarious, you and Hays whole to outdated failing economic ideology.

Condemning others of different opinion as idiots in defence of your own opinions.

I differ in opinion from Rawnsley and Will Hutton and many things, but certainly don't consider them idiots.

Also, don't consider Porky to be an idiot, but think he is mistaken in some of the way he is carrying out his policies, or more precisely the severity and timing of his cuts without real stimulus to the underlying economy.
========

But we will see, but I do recall Hilarious's prediction made before the last election, that the con party would sweep into power with a magnificent landslide.





cynic - 25 Jun 2013 19:18 - 26396 of 81564

i recollect even more vividly that you bluster away and post your stream of beano cartoons, but have never ever answered, even obliquely let alone plainly, the very simple question as to which party you think has a better and viable alternative economic policy (model would be asking too much) than the incumbents

the truism that one should listen to what is NOT said identifies loudly and clearly that you cannot even think of any party whom you imagine (not even think or believe) has a viable alternative ..... under the circumstances, i'm afraid there's no alternative than to return to the sobriquet of (fos)fred - that is not remotely suggetsing you may be an idiot but merely an arsehole

Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 19:52 - 26397 of 81564

Manuel,

As you appreciate the cartoons so much,, I will try and dig some more out for you.

They are sometimes expressive of opinion different to yours and often more insightful.

====

Some parties are worse than others, which is worst is difficult to know, but the one you acclaim is pretty bad.

Now, have a little more wine and relax until your bedtime.

-----



Fred1new - 25 Jun 2013 19:52 - 26398 of 81564

Manuel,

As you appreciate the cartoons so much,, I will try and dig some more out for you.

They are sometimes expressive of opinion different to yours and often more insightful.

====

Some parties are worse than others, which is worst is difficult to know, but the one you acclaim is pretty bad.

Now, have a little more wine and relax until your bedtime.

-----



Register now or login to post to this thread.