mojo47
- 05 Sep 2004 12:19
I bought sbry share about 2 months ago when (i thought)green was lookin at them and i was told no he is a food man, ok i said now someone in america is looking at them any one got a clue whats going on I am up a little bit on them but could do with selling them soon if nothing is going to happen need the money to put someplace else Thanks for any information
daves dazzlers
- 12 Nov 2004 17:57
- 27 of 100
Still on the move,small but the right way now,up on both holdings ..
Suitor`s apply within !!
Stan
- 15 Nov 2004 17:18
- 28 of 100
Sainsbury(J) PLC
15 November 2004
J Sainsbury plc
J Sainsbury plc received notification on 15 November 2004 that Brandes
Investment Partners L.L.C. and its affiliates have increased their reportable
interest in the Company.
As a result the holding has passed one percentage integer and the reportable
interest is now 8.3 per cent instead of 7.96 per cent previously reported.
End
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now why on earth have Brandes done this with a lame duck outfit like Sainsbury?
I don't usually buy only on takeover spec....but i've made an exception with these.
daves dazzlers
- 15 Nov 2004 18:00
- 29 of 100
Me to stan,held these since the summer 2 holdings on an average price of 2.65,,sweet.
Property alone worth a few quid and theres always a chance , be lucky , nothing ventured nothing gained.
Stan
- 15 Nov 2004 18:13
- 30 of 100
Strange that they haven't moved the price today Dave, but there you are...time to sit and wait.
ATB
Stan.
daves dazzlers
- 15 Nov 2004 18:25
- 31 of 100
Well it can only be good for the small investor,brandes must have some faith in sbry,if its a recovery punt,if its for other reasons,,who knows.
I am just going to sit tight,and happy to hold.
daves dazzlers
- 17 Nov 2004 07:42
- 32 of 100
The day of realism,seems about right to me,make the best of a bad supermarket somebody!!!!!!!!!!!!please.
Happy to sit tight , looks a comfy chair.
seawallwalker
- 17 Nov 2004 07:46
- 33 of 100
I don't know if this commentry was missed, but I will repeat it.
From Bloomberg today.
"Losses were less than most analysts expected".
Surely there is a bit of comfort there holders?
Maybe the price will rise as the expected losses would have been written in to the price.
daves dazzlers
- 17 Nov 2004 07:50
- 34 of 100
SW your right there its in the price & more.
daves dazzlers
- 19 Nov 2004 08:26
- 35 of 100
Still going north,like a hgv in the fog.
Stan
- 02 Dec 2004 18:13
- 36 of 100
Falling by the day these, patience required I suppose...or get out?
But there again why did Brandes buy some?
daves dazzlers
- 02 Dec 2004 19:51
- 37 of 100
Evening stan,seems there`s more staff than shoppers these days,but there`s always the property value , must be a few quid . Never been a fan of let the trend be your friend, so its a hold for me.
seawallwalker
- 02 Dec 2004 21:50
- 38 of 100
takeover coming sure as the number 9 bus.........
Stan
- 03 Dec 2004 08:27
- 39 of 100
Sainsbury(J) PLC
03 December 2004
J Sainsbury plc
J Sainsbury plc received notification on 2 December 2004 that Brandes Investment
Partners L.L.C. and its affiliates have increased their reportable interest in
the Company.
As a result the holding has passed one percentage integer and the reportable
interest is now 9.1 per cent instead of 8.3 per cent previously reported.
End
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
---------------------------------------------------------
Eye Eye...think I'll hold for a bit longer then.
seawallwalker
- 03 Dec 2004 08:44
- 40 of 100
Looks like the Number 9!
Stan
- 03 Dec 2004 08:55
- 41 of 100
Could well be SWW....see what the w/e papers can do for the price next week.
daves dazzlers
- 03 Dec 2004 09:05
- 42 of 100
No rush to get out,i see jamie back on telly with the adds,that fish looks dead to me,and that lady with her kippers HANDS OFF my kippers,and wait.
seawallwalker
- 03 Dec 2004 09:11
- 43 of 100
They are not kippers dave, you twit!
No wonder SBRY went into trouble if they can't show a differnece between kippers and smoked salmon!!
LOL
emailpat
- 03 Dec 2004 13:54
- 44 of 100
Jules - 03 Dec'04 - 10:16 - 80 of 114
Is someone a bit stupid or do they know something...They just bought 75,000 shares in Sbry at 290.88 when the actual price is 261.5/261.75?
daves dazzlers
- 03 Dec 2004 14:40
- 45 of 100
Emp,,seems its a bit of stake building from across the pond?
Stan
- 09 Dec 2004 09:22
- 46 of 100
This lot been creeping back this week I notice....and I do mean Creep!