bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
jimmy b
- 16 Apr 2005 11:34
- 2929 of 27111
A financial warning ,,shares can go up as well as down..JB..
halfamil
- 16 Apr 2005 11:43
- 2930 of 27111
Squelched him. He's ruining a good board. I've read his drivel elsewhere when he posted as thebigw, then disappeared when Asda signed. Boasted he was shorting and talked about 6 figure sums. He's a sad muppet.
superrod
- 16 Apr 2005 11:43
- 2931 of 27111
although a holder, i accept this share is high risk. even the most bullish should adopt the devils advocate viewpoint. a few short months ago it was circa 4p......now 20p. the slightest hint of bad ( or not so good ) news will see a bloodbath imo.
tipsters? forget them. they are just a useful tool in raising share prices for anyone who is holding before the tip.
anyone remember INTEREX? everyone and their mother was tipping it as THE share ( even around 35 quid if memory serves ). out come a few RNSs and the last i saw they were 13p. now bust i assume. a salutory lesson to anyone who thinks they can get rich by pressing a few buttons on a PC.
Dil
- 16 Apr 2005 11:57
- 2932 of 27111
bosley - Suehelen got what he/she deserved , the QTR thread was the ultimate in misleading posts and outright lies , no wonder she/he disappeared but is no doubt on here under many other aliases.
Good luck with these bosley.
andysmith
- 16 Apr 2005 12:16
- 2933 of 27111
insiderx2, have a day off and go back to your day job, preparing reports on WMD's for Tone & other absolute bollocks like taxes haven gone up etc etc.
You are entitled to your views but if you are so convinced all is going to go tits up, back your horse pal, go short for real and we will congratulate you when you win at our expense. I like JB's comment, shares can go up as well as down. Superrod, tipsters can tip UP or DOWN as this guy has by re-writing the RNS's. It's up to the individual to make their own mind up.
We have been tipping a quid for a while on here and now you have the potential for 100p in black and white in Shares mag, yes it's potential but realistic in my opinion based upon my knowledge of RF sealing performance vs heatseals and the pressures in packaging/retailing to reduce costs and improve where possible the environment - reduced packaging/energy and waste.
Remember, nobody forces you to press the BUY button.
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 12:18
- 2934 of 27111
i did say yesterday that his style of writing , his syntax and punctuation are very similar, ( insipid insipid and bigw). both postings have the same tone , both have the " i'm just a reasonable guy looking to do you guys a favour" spin. i don't need to say much . it's very obvious where his ambitions lie, and truth be told , ANY piece of writing can be pulled apart like that. it isn't difficult and was something we used to do at school. so well done, sir , you've passed your 16plus exam. you have made your point. personally , i don't take to people assuming i am so thick i need to be told the same thing over and over and over again. everyone here has dtor and made a decision. pretty soon it will become clear wether we are right and you are wrong , or vice versa. i'm confidant of the outcome.
jimmy b
- 16 Apr 2005 12:47
- 2935 of 27111
Well said andysmith and bos,,can we just get on with it now ,i like to hear the negative and positive from you guys ,(i understand andy's a packaging man),,but let this person ramble on and dont bite anymore ,he's had his say,he's on advfn doing the same...JB..
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 16:08
- 2938 of 27111
dil, cheers. i quite liked suehelen . i got caught and stung and it taught me a few things so she/he did me a real favour.
driver, go on , let it out...**********......( blimey !!! where are you getting pints for 50p from??)
TheFrenchConnection
- 16 Apr 2005 16:09
- 2939 of 27111
Amities/...{ lncidentally Aldwick Sue Helen is a MAN !! } <> Having been away yesterday being held ransom in a room listening to a painfully boring fund raising exercise by yet another mining company { almost as awful as TMC } attempting to realise its ambitions to secure both monies and promotion from Offex to a placement on AIM index, it is only now( saturday afternoon ) i have had the oppertunity, or misfortune, to have read the dramatic "out of the blue" postings of insider x2 . And i strongly concur with all those who strongly and vociferously diagreed with this character . lts all been said so why do l get the awful feeling this individual geniuinally thinks he is doing us all a huge favour in sharing his apocolyptic insights into SEO with us ?. But what of his motive ? And why now ? To a certain extent that much is easy.,,Fear,ego,or gold. ? Or is really that easy ? Personally speaking:i take it as something of an insult you tedious little man. .And collectively, we are -none of us - either as gullible nor utterly devoid of simple common sense nor without links into both the packaging industry or the city as you seem to think..ln addition we are numerically literate. . . . But could you do us all a much bigger favour and PLEASE remember to take your medication. Joking aside ;Your contribution is "deramping" of the first order, and of the worst kind, and were i not a fan of Zola ( the philosopher - not the footie player hehe ) l would seriously venture to suggest your posting was worthy of censorship ..Or "squelching" as Di quantly refers to it. lts intention is quite wilfull, deliberate and organized; yet erroneous and what really gauls me is that i suspect you are being PAID to propogate such utter nonsense. Quite ironic that your very FIRST posting on this thread/ board should lack any objectivity ,be so bloody dogmatic and repetive & negative, and MORE to the point , come right in the wake of Simon C's recent "shorting" exercise .Your posting reads more like that of the senior house dealer who upon realization he holds a a potential stinker and without even thinking he is onto his lackeys to get on the phone to all known small clients and to wax lyrical about the stock in question in order to downsize thier OWN overweight position. Except, of course, this is in reverse mode. Now lf that were my only evidence , and on that copy alone, i would suspect you were merely holding an almost unbearable "short" position " or perhaps contitute one of the army of disgruntled BPRG holders having a "pop" at we on here ,,But there is more; and what really what convinces me is that you are one of his acolytes is that your postings contain the VERY SAME same errors ( reg. names and organizations ) as does Simon C's in his original "note" to his clients on SEO posing a lucrative "short" ,Yes! The very same ! ,lt absolutely STINKS !! ,,,and all this at a time when MMS are short of stock amply illsustated by the fact it took me a bit of ringing around to forfill my order earliar this week ,,,,So i directly ask you.Do you EVEN hold a position in SEO ? Are you short ? .Finally- more of a rhetorical qustion connsidering the legality of it all ,,But are you in receipt of any type of reward for aididng and abbeting the mms replenish their coffers ? After all this stock has daily volumes that exceed 20 million and when BUYS outweigh SELLS quite dramatically on a regular basis, simple logic tells you mms must be desperate for stock .And at all costs it would seem. . ,,,,a'bientot / bonne chance ,,,,,@+ J,,,
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 16:13
- 2940 of 27111
well said that man!!!
driver
- 16 Apr 2005 16:44
- 2942 of 27111
aldwickk
- 16 Apr 2005 17:25
- 2943 of 27111
Zola, i thought he ment the runner, LOL
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 17:42
- 2945 of 27111
For the record - I am not getting paid anything for writing any post - or working for any broker or MM - so lets clear that up. I would suspect that the rampers will now try their very hardest to reassure anyone buying in recently that its been a wise investment - if at below 18p - it was a good investment and quite possibly time to take profits - you can always buy back in later (more than likely at a lower price and if after the interims then a very low price). The rampers are doing themselves silly saying this is going to 1 pound - so why the worry over a few negative posts - it is because they know its seriously overvalued now - and while they sell their holdings - they want you to buy to support the price.
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 18:05
- 2946 of 27111
Do not forget too - the only official Stanelco web site is
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/ and any link on that site.
Any other web site you see may be set up by a paid ramper - whose only goal is to fool people into buying at overvalued prices. Some people have been tricked by other web sites thinking they are the real Stanelco site.
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 18:41
- 2947 of 27111
Apart from the Branson Ultrasonics website - it looks like Walmart already know of how good Ultrasonic sealing is - they use Soniteks
http://www.sonitek.com/clamshell.htm
No other sealing process is faster or as cost effective as Ultrasonics!
Ultrasonic sealing provides Tamper Proof Protection, and meets all the sealing requirements from all the major retailers (Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, etc.) for sealing clamshells to eliminate losses due to shrinkage or shipping damage.