bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
TheFrenchConnection
- 16 Apr 2005 16:09
- 2939 of 27111
Amities/...{ lncidentally Aldwick Sue Helen is a MAN !! } <> Having been away yesterday being held ransom in a room listening to a painfully boring fund raising exercise by yet another mining company { almost as awful as TMC } attempting to realise its ambitions to secure both monies and promotion from Offex to a placement on AIM index, it is only now( saturday afternoon ) i have had the oppertunity, or misfortune, to have read the dramatic "out of the blue" postings of insider x2 . And i strongly concur with all those who strongly and vociferously diagreed with this character . lts all been said so why do l get the awful feeling this individual geniuinally thinks he is doing us all a huge favour in sharing his apocolyptic insights into SEO with us ?. But what of his motive ? And why now ? To a certain extent that much is easy.,,Fear,ego,or gold. ? Or is really that easy ? Personally speaking:i take it as something of an insult you tedious little man. .And collectively, we are -none of us - either as gullible nor utterly devoid of simple common sense nor without links into both the packaging industry or the city as you seem to think..ln addition we are numerically literate. . . . But could you do us all a much bigger favour and PLEASE remember to take your medication. Joking aside ;Your contribution is "deramping" of the first order, and of the worst kind, and were i not a fan of Zola ( the philosopher - not the footie player hehe ) l would seriously venture to suggest your posting was worthy of censorship ..Or "squelching" as Di quantly refers to it. lts intention is quite wilfull, deliberate and organized; yet erroneous and what really gauls me is that i suspect you are being PAID to propogate such utter nonsense. Quite ironic that your very FIRST posting on this thread/ board should lack any objectivity ,be so bloody dogmatic and repetive & negative, and MORE to the point , come right in the wake of Simon C's recent "shorting" exercise .Your posting reads more like that of the senior house dealer who upon realization he holds a a potential stinker and without even thinking he is onto his lackeys to get on the phone to all known small clients and to wax lyrical about the stock in question in order to downsize thier OWN overweight position. Except, of course, this is in reverse mode. Now lf that were my only evidence , and on that copy alone, i would suspect you were merely holding an almost unbearable "short" position " or perhaps contitute one of the army of disgruntled BPRG holders having a "pop" at we on here ,,But there is more; and what really what convinces me is that you are one of his acolytes is that your postings contain the VERY SAME same errors ( reg. names and organizations ) as does Simon C's in his original "note" to his clients on SEO posing a lucrative "short" ,Yes! The very same ! ,lt absolutely STINKS !! ,,,and all this at a time when MMS are short of stock amply illsustated by the fact it took me a bit of ringing around to forfill my order earliar this week ,,,,So i directly ask you.Do you EVEN hold a position in SEO ? Are you short ? .Finally- more of a rhetorical qustion connsidering the legality of it all ,,But are you in receipt of any type of reward for aididng and abbeting the mms replenish their coffers ? After all this stock has daily volumes that exceed 20 million and when BUYS outweigh SELLS quite dramatically on a regular basis, simple logic tells you mms must be desperate for stock .And at all costs it would seem. . ,,,,a'bientot / bonne chance ,,,,,@+ J,,,
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 16:13
- 2940 of 27111
well said that man!!!
driver
- 16 Apr 2005 16:44
- 2942 of 27111
aldwickk
- 16 Apr 2005 17:25
- 2943 of 27111
Zola, i thought he ment the runner, LOL
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 17:42
- 2945 of 27111
For the record - I am not getting paid anything for writing any post - or working for any broker or MM - so lets clear that up. I would suspect that the rampers will now try their very hardest to reassure anyone buying in recently that its been a wise investment - if at below 18p - it was a good investment and quite possibly time to take profits - you can always buy back in later (more than likely at a lower price and if after the interims then a very low price). The rampers are doing themselves silly saying this is going to 1 pound - so why the worry over a few negative posts - it is because they know its seriously overvalued now - and while they sell their holdings - they want you to buy to support the price.
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 18:05
- 2946 of 27111
Do not forget too - the only official Stanelco web site is
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/ and any link on that site.
Any other web site you see may be set up by a paid ramper - whose only goal is to fool people into buying at overvalued prices. Some people have been tricked by other web sites thinking they are the real Stanelco site.
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 18:41
- 2947 of 27111
Apart from the Branson Ultrasonics website - it looks like Walmart already know of how good Ultrasonic sealing is - they use Soniteks
http://www.sonitek.com/clamshell.htm
No other sealing process is faster or as cost effective as Ultrasonics!
Ultrasonic sealing provides Tamper Proof Protection, and meets all the sealing requirements from all the major retailers (Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Lowe's, etc.) for sealing clamshells to eliminate losses due to shrinkage or shipping damage.
jimmy b
- 16 Apr 2005 19:07
- 2949 of 27111
The rampers as you say, are people who believe SEO is a good investment,and don't agree with your view. You've had your say ,now your becoming boring..
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 19:45
- 2950 of 27111
maybe di had the right idea.......
he is becoming boring. insider x 2, as i and others have said before, you have made your point. find something new to say .
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 19:52
- 2951 of 27111
overgrowth - I have no short - and by asking people to look at the company from all angles is not making them lose money - only a ramper can make people lose money by buying into an overpriced company - get your facts right. Rampers are dangerous and offer nothing by telling you to buy buy buy - while they sell sell sell.
I do not approve of ramping or shorting - and what people must remember - the two live hand in hand - as without ramping there can be no shorting - shorting is only done when the price is ramped up above the fundamentals - if there were no ramping there would be no shorting. Both of these functions are done by people with no morals - it is not something I would do.
Why cannot people help each other - or do you have no values in your life and would not assist others unless they paid you to ?
insiderinside
- 16 Apr 2005 19:58
- 2952 of 27111
A final comment for today -
The Spin Doctors manipulating this could get William Hague elected as the next Prime Minister - they are that good.
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 19:59
- 2953 of 27111
in what way , shape or form ,are you helping?
andysmith
- 16 Apr 2005 21:14
- 2957 of 27111
Will this idiot ever Foxtrot Oscar!!!! Who the cluckin bell do you think you are telling folk that we say buy and are actually selling. I suggest you apologise. I can only speak for myself but I have put my money where my mouth is from a very low share price and added along the way, the latest being at 20p last Monday. I have personally taken great pleasure in seeing many family and friends share my optimism and make some additional money for themselves after investing in SEO. That is helping pal, not writing a lot of crap on this thread.
bosley
- 16 Apr 2005 21:15
- 2958 of 27111
oh dear. sorry driver , i didnt watch it. why? what was so special about it?
and stop ramping , you.....you.....RAMPER!!!!!!!!