for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Hiya Jacks, yes I sold out of BPRG some time ago, over all I was up as been into BPRG from 40p ish, had a gut feeling something was not right with BPRG, wont be long before SEO is higher than BPRG at this rate. Poor sods that left there money in BPRG.

Currently I do not hold SEO (mores the pity) but will be back soon I hope, all funds tied up at present, waiting for another share to come good (firstafriaoil) then I will be back into SEO... hoping to get in sub 20p though... I live in hope.

Good luck you lucky people/investors, very astute investors...

And me. Jamie, sent you a email.

adieh,hello. long time no see. what's this? you are hoping to get back in at sub 20p? it's not you posing as insiderinside trying to get the price down is it???????????????:)
(stroking chin thoughtfully.....)

A resounding AYE from me too. It's all insider his own mind. Go back to the other side with your petty analysis and leave this bulletin board alone for the more astute investors who won't rise to the bait. You are filtered.

Ian Taylor

A request on behalf of all serious contributors to this bb, I believe, that insiderinside is permanently squelched from this and other MoneyAM boards. Overgrowth's post on "bashing" is the justification. No doubt he will return under another alias, but he will give himself away with a one-track mind.

Many thanks

Eric

Have copied this post directly to Ian. I haven't squelched insideoutside myself so that I can keep track of his shennanigins - occasional visitors to the board could be poisoned by him and lose hard earned money.

Eric

I thought only bigboys invested in shares and CFDs. The little boys and girls shouldn't be led astray. Censor all the postings other than mine and Eric's!!!



8-)

Can anyone put some fact behind that Spin Document on an RNS on the 24th March - it says only certain suppliers will be part of the deal (as the deal is with Asda suppliers and not exactly Asda) and then it says only those suppliers "where practical" would change.

Now the Asda deal is still not in effect due to further trials - meaning that contract is worth nothing as we stand - and even with the contract the price is then good for 13p. (yes it is horrendously over valued at the moment"

The RNS say "perhaps up to several hundred machines could be converted" well that actually means that between 10 to 999 could be converted - it may be 10 it may be 100 it could be anything up to the maximum 999.

Its very misleading - I wonder if anyone has any confirmed papers where the actual "potentially several hundred" is more defined ?

Or is it deliberate to say several hundred when they know - if and when the Asda deal comes into effect - maybe only 100 would ever be converted ??

Can anyone find any of the suppliers names in the trial programme who converted - I would like to find the actual selling price of the conversion kit - there are ramped figures about but they are totally false - are we talking of 5,000 pounds per machine - or 15,000 pounds per machine. It cannot be very much per machine as its then cheaper to buy new and forget about any retrofit programme - this is probably why the RNS said "expected" and "change where practical" - I can imagine many of Asda suppliers will refuse outright to spend their money with no R.O.I. (which again cannot be measured or guaged - we just get UP TO in the RNS - which means between 1 and XX % - really - Up to - I ask the question what are the Spin Doctors and Rampers UP TO. Can they not learn to post average figures - these explain in real detail - not just SPIN - UP TO "x"%.

I mean really - its so misleading - xxx company find the minimum saving of power could be 2% and the maximum 30% (on the oldest type of thermal sealer known to man) and the average 4%.

Now in an RNS they go and state - power savings up to 30%.

Is that misleading ?

If they said average saving 4% - then you would know and they could not put there is an ROI if the "indicated" figures are beaten - but if they post the maximum and say power savings up to - they can then say there is an ROI if that indicated up to figure is bettered.

Very strange.

Ignore this InsiderInside fellow - he is clearly a bear with an agenda to scare SEO investors with inaccurate bullshit. A friend of Weevil Kneival....

Poverty read back the last couple of days,,what man...JB..

I've decided to squelch this tosser........

blackbelt he's been squelched by most ,since the weekend..JB..

Quite frankly I am appalled at the treatment of insiderinside on this board. Most of his posts, especially his early ones, put forward nothing other than straightforward facts which anyone reading the RNS closely should be able to derive. Many of you posting here in recent days should be ashamed of yourselves.

He is quite right to point out that the main RNS on the ASDA deal says that it is contingent on further successful trials at three different sites. What seems to be misleading people is that the first paragraph says that SEO have entered into an exclusive, binding deal with ASDA and most people here seem to take that as meaning that the sales are assured. Careful reading several paragraphs down, though, quite clearly reveals that the sales within the agreement are contingent on further trials. Whether you agree with his interpretation of where the share price should be based on the facts is up to you, but to try and censor his opinion because it doesn't agree with your opinion is dreadful, especially to dress it up with "protecting the poor, nervous novice investor who might get scared out".

insiderinside has repeatedly asked members of this board to present facts which contradict this and instead I have seen nothing but 'insiderinside bashing' and a questioning of his motives in response along with snide allegations about his character.

I am really saddened by this. People on this board are constantly exhorting us to 'do our own research' yet it appears that if we do, and present a case which contradicts the sentiment of the members of this board then the only result is to be shot down with emotive, not factual, responses.

Full disclosure: I am a long-time member of MoneyAM. I do not know insiderinside except from his posts on this thread. I am a holder of SEO shares which have done quite well for me so far, and I expect them to continue to do better because I am confident that the trials upon which the ASDA sales are contigent will be as successful as those already undertaken. I don't hide behind a pseudonym, unlike most who post here.

No doubt, however, I will be attacked and slandered for daring to support insiderinside's right to post factual information as a result of his research, possibly even squelched by other members. Luckily, however, I don't base my investment decisions solely on the posts of other members here, but actually do my own research as I am constantly advised, and put the comments here into that context.

Doug Clinton

I also use my own name on here.doug,and i like to hear everyones view,,but if you can't see whats going on ,you must be blind..JB..

Doug

I had started to write something along the same lines yesterday evening, but in the end gave up. It seems a fact of life that positive comment is OK (and of course never ramping!) yet a contrary view is treated with considerable contempt. The whole rationale for a BB IMO is to share information, interpretation and opinion. I also hold an interest in SEO.

Regards

PTH

Amities / l take offence from that last comment . Likewise every literate member on this board does his OWN research. TRY reading them !! We are a diverse broad lot from equally diverse backgrounds . Thats why we are here !! Thrown together by a pure concensus of logics that equates to the simple fact that each of us have recognised that in RF tec we have found the ace in the pack ,,,,Good post from deancroft manifestly pointing out the respective massive differences in RF tec and ultrasonics. l sneeked back into the market with a furthur 50,000 @ 18.91. Never imagind i would get the chance ; but i take what the market offers me ........a/b ..bonne chance a'vous,,,,Fares attention !! Sois sages !!!,,,@+ J,

I like to hear everyones view, and as a new person to this game I take what everyone says with a pinch of salt until I've done my own research. It is overwhealmingly obvious even to me insider inside is slating SEO for his own gain. He's therefore taking advantage of the less experienced and effectively pinching from my pocket to line his, whilst creating a charade of heing a nice guy going out of his way to help us poor fools. Personally I find that dispicable, unlike the army of reasonable people here who are providing factual information and support, and as a result have made me money. I'm sorry Doug, I don't want to stoke the fire and start another debate about him but he's very transparent and to me and I just hope that by posting this other less experienced people would also see through him. It's a shame you don't.

Doug/pth - I don't know if you guys are traders or not - I assume not, because if you are you should know that it's a dog eat dog world out there in the markets.

Longer term investing is totally different where reasoned debate and fundamental analysis are to be encouraged.

I have read copies of insiderinside's views many many times over - why? Simply because he posts cutting and pasting the same stuff on numerous BB's where he hopes SEO investors will be reading. Now, you need to ask yourselves a question "Why on earth would someone want to post the same comments all over the place at the same time?". Unfortunately, it's not to help other investors or to provide reasoned debate - it's simply to get maximum short term exposure in a blatant attempt to force the price of SEO down by encouraging sellers.

I've been around a while and I've seen exactly the same tactics used before on other shares (RTD last year particularly springs to mind), albeit mainly over on ADVFN where the BB's are much less pleasant and accomodating compared to moneyam which I think is normally a great forum for genuine exchange of ideas and research etc.

I'm all for free speech on BB's unless I know for sure that the speaker is deliberately trying to manipulate and mislead the audience - hence insiderinside remains firmly squelched on my terminal.

I never thought I would see 19p again and the last time I topped up I said was my last, but how could I miss such an opportunity, Topped up again (10th time)