Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 08:37 - 3187 of 8631

Thanks Bullshare.any information gratefully received.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 09:14 - 3188 of 8631

lol no I'm just Dil tabby.

Have been on occassions

Ebboooo
Dill
and a couple of others on advfn but that was only when bullshare was in charge and kept banning "Dil" for various reasons :-)

kimoldfield - 03 Oct 2008 09:31 - 3189 of 8631

MDX +1p! Have faith Tabby there ARE some other believers out there ;o)

ptholden - 03 Oct 2008 09:41 - 3190 of 8631

Will MDX be able to arrange a loan?

MDX need finance - loan or shares issue?

With Banks continuing to throttle back their willingness to provide perosnal or business loans, is this an option for MDX? I think not, the rate at which they would have to repay any such loan would surely be crippling. I favour the option of issuing further shares which will unfortunately (for existing investors) dilute their holding even further. The level of dilution will clearly have an impact on the SP and the balance sheet and for that reason I cannot see any reason for the SP to increase dramatically during the next 12 months. FWIW I also took the trouble to read through the latest product updates and whilst the list might be impressive, something like half of the areas in whcih MDX are now focussing their attentions will not reap any financial benefit this year (some not for years to come). I see no reason to alter my stance.

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 09:44 - 3191 of 8631

Kim.I have never lost faiththe company are a certainty to succeed one way or another big timeI dont think I have ever seen such a strong and solid bunch of PIs. Once I have calculated on a decision I never waver! It upsets me to see the effect derampers have on others that may be stretched..

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 09:45 - 3192 of 8631

pt said have a nice weekend tabby.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 09:47 - 3193 of 8631

And stop talking crap tabby , the effect on others is caused by rampers like you who got them into this pile of sh*te in the first place.

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 09:53 - 3194 of 8631

Tell mr gay boy potty and the rest of his gang not to worry about me any more DilI am no longer involved.I would also tell them from my end they have developed quite a large fan clubI know of many good people that are now after their autographbig fans!

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 10:13 - 3195 of 8631

Think about it Dillong and hardas investors reading mdx posts what do we all think is your purpose on this site? if you do not like the company dont give them your money!but are you really concerned about people losing money?cant you sleep at night thinkingI must spread the gospel to avoid further loses for all these good peopledo me a favourwe treat you for what you areyou fool nobody!thats why I have a laugh with you occasionallybut your fears for my health and wealth along with others investing in this companyare taken as a jokeask all the nice lads one at a timedo they think you are trying to help themlol!

ptholden - 03 Oct 2008 10:18 - 3196 of 8631

Dil, lying git :-)

I dunno, I try to be objective and the result is continuing insults and some half-arsed thinly veiled threat from the thread loon. LMAO

I'm really worried about this large fan base of autograph hunters, I mean if they're that keen why arn't they piling into this thread and asking in person? Simple truth is tabasco doesn't know any MDX holders excepting the idiots who post on ADVFN. The ramping brethren tickle each other's egos and offer meaningless assurances. In the meantime their investments have shrunk by at 50%.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:23 - 3197 of 8631

I post to contradict the utter tripe posted by some on here , if you don't like it then tough cos its my honest opinion which I'm entitled to post just as you are.

What you or anyone else thinks doesn't really matter to me tabby.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:27 - 3198 of 8631

Opening post is a good example of utter tripe !

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:27 - 3199 of 8631

And the thread title.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:28 - 3200 of 8631

And most of your posts assuring everyone you never lose and this will be a success.

jeffmack - 03 Oct 2008 10:30 - 3201 of 8631

Too many personal insults flying about on this thread when there doesnt need to be. Personally I think that threads need their rampers, derampers and dreamers to give a balanced view (as long as its civil)

I dont think for one minute that Tabby is a ramper, he is more like a dreamer who is love with the share, is sitting on a loss but ultimately believes it will give him big gains in the future.

I dont believe that Dil and Treb are deramping for their own gain and much of what they say is very true and factual.

I for one got caught in the hype many times in my early share buying days. I used to listern to people saying this will treble in 6 months, going to the moon etc etc. I think I lost money in almost every share of this type I invested in. Maybe if there had been a Dil or Treb about at the time I would have thought twice about some of my investments.

This thread would have very few posts if Dil and Treb were not invoking some kind of response from tabby or the nasty scotty.

So live and let live and accept that others can and do have different opinions to yourself, but no need for personal attacks.

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:32 - 3202 of 8631

I think tabby is a wind a merchant with little if any interest in this share to be honest jeff.

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 10:35 - 3203 of 8631

Dil why do you contradict what people that put up say.you have no financial interest in the companyand you certainly dont care about other peoples investmentsso there should be absolutely no reason to post.and you wont give any reason other than to contradict because there aint one without sounding a c**t!

Dil - 03 Oct 2008 10:45 - 3204 of 8631

I've had a financial interest in these on numerous occassions but thats irreleveant.

tabasco - 03 Oct 2008 11:28 - 3205 of 8631

Jeffthat was a good post and well worth answering your several points with honest answers.first of all I am not a ramperI have nil influence on a mdx SP and wouldnt want oneI am not a dreamerI have my way of calculating risk that has proved successful for myself and many friends that followBeing an ex. Bookmaker I have some knowledge in the racing industry and post comprehensively most Saturdays as helpno motivesno gainand I do get paid for similar views outside am
JeffDil treblemouth.gay boy pottyal and co.are committed shortersand if you dont think they deramp wellcomecome!Andy .. Kim and others dont hold shares but you dont hear them carrying on in the manor of the tribe! They say their point of viewand we read with interesteven if we dont agree sometimes.
Do you or any other posters want the kind of response the tribe provoke.shit company10p..05p.. .going down.bod shitand so ondont think so.
Listen I have been investing since 1988 and I am sitting on a large loss on mdx at the momentalthough after just reading Dils post evidently Im notso I dont particularly want to hear peoples shit company gibes when they dont have a penny committed themselvese.g. dont moan at the Government if you havent voted!
Jeffmaybe some of the things I write dont come over so well sometimesbut believe me we have a real good laugh in life and Dil knows I dont dislike himeven if he is a wan*er at times

hangon - 03 Oct 2008 12:14 - 3206 of 8631

effmack it's probably true to say that most small caps on AIM (or less!) are worthless. That is IMHO worth considerably less than the punter is expected to pay. The only way a company can raise money is to sell shares for cash. Unfortunately this requires the price to be considerably higher than evens - since their advisors need money up-front.
-Perhaps we should be asking if any professionals are taking their pay in shares?
-and what price they paid!

If you consider the solid businesses on the Main Market, the likes of HBOS, LLOY and NRK - these all give (gave) indications they were solid and at no time did anyone suggest they were on the road to ruin. Even the Auditors of NRK were quite happy to sign-off their report . . . yet to anyone that knew their buinsess model could see there were risks.
Gradually as investors looked, this risk became common-currency, with any who had bought cheaply, cashing in "just in case".
More recently the tie-up LLOY/HBOS has made folk look at the HBOS model, and realise that it's not so different from NRK ( or B&B, now Nationalised), whose businesss depends upon easy-money. The risk that this might falter, (even for 1-year) is considerable over such a long timescale, like 25 years.... Yet this was never pointed out to investors. (or Depositors, hence those queues!)
-Now about AIM - these are "lightly regulated" (indeed the AIM Market uses this as a boast, (like selling Rottweillers with elastic leashes, eh?), this not in the Public (investment) interest IMHO and where Institutions hold a small % you will see this being sold-down in these times. Fortunately for them they bought cheaply, so don't suffer like Retail Investors.
Incidently I suspect we pay too much, maybe by a factor between ten and fifty in good times. That's why "even now" many AIM-stocks are overpriced, when you factor-in the risks....
1)That you don't get a dividend.
2)That your investment goes belly-up.

If someone can estimate - What price should one pay for these combined risks?
Not easy, eh?
Register now or login to post to this thread.