The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

I post to contradict the utter tripe posted by some on here , if you don't like it then tough cos its my honest opinion which I'm entitled to post just as you are.

What you or anyone else thinks doesn't really matter to me tabby.

Opening post is a good example of utter tripe !

And the thread title.

And most of your posts assuring everyone you never lose and this will be a success.

Too many personal insults flying about on this thread when there doesnt need to be. Personally I think that threads need their rampers, derampers and dreamers to give a balanced view (as long as its civil)

I dont think for one minute that Tabby is a ramper, he is more like a dreamer who is love with the share, is sitting on a loss but ultimately believes it will give him big gains in the future.

I dont believe that Dil and Treb are deramping for their own gain and much of what they say is very true and factual.

I for one got caught in the hype many times in my early share buying days. I used to listern to people saying this will treble in 6 months, going to the moon etc etc. I think I lost money in almost every share of this type I invested in. Maybe if there had been a Dil or Treb about at the time I would have thought twice about some of my investments.

This thread would have very few posts if Dil and Treb were not invoking some kind of response from tabby or the nasty scotty.

So live and let live and accept that others can and do have different opinions to yourself, but no need for personal attacks.

I think tabby is a wind a merchant with little if any interest in this share to be honest jeff.

Dil why do you contradict what people that put up say.you have no financial interest in the companyand you certainly dont care about other peoples investmentsso there should be absolutely no reason to post.and you wont give any reason other than to contradict because there aint one without sounding a c**t!

I've had a financial interest in these on numerous occassions but thats irreleveant.

Jeffthat was a good post and well worth answering your several points with honest answers.first of all I am not a ramperI have nil influence on a mdx SP and wouldnt want oneI am not a dreamerI have my way of calculating risk that has proved successful for myself and many friends that followBeing an ex. Bookmaker I have some knowledge in the racing industry and post comprehensively most Saturdays as helpno motivesno gainand I do get paid for similar views outside am
JeffDil treblemouth.gay boy pottyal and co.are committed shortersand if you dont think they deramp wellcomecome!Andy .. Kim and others dont hold shares but you dont hear them carrying on in the manor of the tribe! They say their point of viewand we read with interesteven if we dont agree sometimes.
Do you or any other posters want the kind of response the tribe provoke.shit company10p..05p.. .going down.bod shitand so ondont think so.
Listen I have been investing since 1988 and I am sitting on a large loss on mdx at the momentalthough after just reading Dils post evidently Im notso I dont particularly want to hear peoples shit company gibes when they dont have a penny committed themselvese.g. dont moan at the Government if you havent voted!
Jeffmaybe some of the things I write dont come over so well sometimesbut believe me we have a real good laugh in life and Dil knows I dont dislike himeven if he is a wan*er at times

effmack it's probably true to say that most small caps on AIM (or less!) are worthless. That is IMHO worth considerably less than the punter is expected to pay. The only way a company can raise money is to sell shares for cash. Unfortunately this requires the price to be considerably higher than evens - since their advisors need money up-front.
-Perhaps we should be asking if any professionals are taking their pay in shares?
-and what price they paid!

If you consider the solid businesses on the Main Market, the likes of HBOS, LLOY and NRK - these all give (gave) indications they were solid and at no time did anyone suggest they were on the road to ruin. Even the Auditors of NRK were quite happy to sign-off their report . . . yet to anyone that knew their buinsess model could see there were risks.
Gradually as investors looked, this risk became common-currency, with any who had bought cheaply, cashing in "just in case".
More recently the tie-up LLOY/HBOS has made folk look at the HBOS model, and realise that it's not so different from NRK ( or B&B, now Nationalised), whose businesss depends upon easy-money. The risk that this might falter, (even for 1-year) is considerable over such a long timescale, like 25 years.... Yet this was never pointed out to investors. (or Depositors, hence those queues!)
-Now about AIM - these are "lightly regulated" (indeed the AIM Market uses this as a boast, (like selling Rottweillers with elastic leashes, eh?), this not in the Public (investment) interest IMHO and where Institutions hold a small % you will see this being sold-down in these times. Fortunately for them they bought cheaply, so don't suffer like Retail Investors.
Incidently I suspect we pay too much, maybe by a factor between ten and fifty in good times. That's why "even now" many AIM-stocks are overpriced, when you factor-in the risks....
1)That you don't get a dividend.
2)That your investment goes belly-up.

If someone can estimate - What price should one pay for these combined risks?
Not easy, eh?

Dil, you're wrong (nothing new there huh?) Tabby isn't only fully invested he's leveraged up to the hilt and he's on the verge of losing a great deal of money he can ill afford. How do I know? I just do. Why does he continue to verbally abuse and threaten me? Because he knows I can read him like a 9 year old's bedtime story.

Nice bounce, it won't last. 10p IMO

42p ! Someones done a strange calculation ... without shorts !!!

Dil was close Bert.

42.5p per share to raise 562,199.14"

eh why would anyoen buy shares via a placinmg at 42.5p when you can get them on the market at nearly a third of that......lunacy

Treblemouth….they know a good company when they see one…must be sure of future SP!

from 2 plonkers posting only yesterday.............

Dil - 02 Oct 2008 12:13 - 3173 of 3212
If it was 5p it would be because they are desperate and have to take what they can get.

30p .... your having a giraffe !

Why do you think they aren't saying how much they raised ????

ptholden - 02 Oct 2008 12:33 - 3174 of 3212
What is pertinent is that they have had to issue shares to raise cash which reinforces their poor financial position. If they were issued at yesterday's market value of 19p (unlikley) they raised 250k, this is not a great deal of money for a 50M turnover company

mind u, dil is he one that couldnt read an rns properly re barclays holdings not that long ago

Hello Scotty…how are you doing? Its hard graft on this site!
I think with a “put option” you can do a current deal to sell [price fixed and discounted] for a future sell? But mdx has not been that price or near for ages!

Nice close 14.5% up and more good rns to come shortly…“As a result of the strong trading position coupled with the development projects………
Company is currently in detailed discussions with multiple providers of capital, and hope to be in a position to update the market in the very near”