Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 14 Nov 2013 21:14 - 32835 of 81564

Hays,

I do hope "the government hasn't done anything to the nurses".


---------

MaxK - 14 Nov 2013 21:24 - 32836 of 81564

Cast Iron Dave is at it again.....



We're handing over more power to the EU – but the Government doesn't want you to know

The rush towards a criminal justice and policing 'opt-in' puts our national sovereignty at risk, writes Jacob Rees-Mogg.




By Jacob Rees-Mogg

1:30PM GMT 13 Nov 2013

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/10446706/Were-handing-over-more-power-to-the-EU-but-the-Government-doesnt-want-you-to-know.html


One of the most important parts of the Lisbon Treaty was to change police and criminal justice measures from intergovernmental arrangements to a responsibility of the European Union. This removed the veto, brought in the European Parliament and allowed the Commission to bring enforcement actions via the Court of Justice. The United Kingdom was given a block opt-out to be applied before the deadline of December 1, 2014. This has now been exercised, removing the United Kingdom from 129 measures – and the Government is now deliberating on those which it wishes to rejoin.


The Government set out its position in July and in response to some pressure agreed to allow time for a number of House of Commons select committees to review its options. Last week the European Scrutiny Committee, chaired with great distinction by Bill Cash, produced its thorough report. It is an important work that was completed under a tight time frame much to the credit of the Chairman and the Clerks.


As a starting point, the report reviews the six broad categories that the 129 measures fall into. These are: measures intended to influence the criminal law; those affecting criminal procedures; mutual recognition of other member states’ decisions; police cooperation; EU agencies and international agreements between the European Union and third countries. It then explains how the opt-out works, the transitional arrangements and the ease of opting back in. It asks the key question of whether the UK would be able to establish equally effective alternative arrangements. Next, it assesses the Government’s reasons for wanting to opt back into 35 measures and examines the decision-making process. Finally, the report tries to establish the extent to which each decision is a matter of policy or principle.


The conclusion is troubling. The European Scrutiny Committee, of which I am a member, is critical of the process. The Government promised to inform Parliament of its intention in February but delayed until July. At that point there was much urgency which has hindered the efforts of the House of Commons to hold the Government to account. The claims made for the block opt-out and opt back in are exaggerated. Theresa May, the Home Secretary, says that the block opt-out is “first and foremost...about bringing powers home” and Chris Grayling, the Lord Chancellor, views it as “part of a process of bringing powers back to this country” yet many of the 94 measures that will be permanently opted out of are defunct or trivial while the 35 to be re-entered bring the full authority of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Commission and the European Parliament to bear.


This is a tangible transfer of power against an intangible return. As the report says: “Adherence to any legally binding EU police and criminal justice measure brings with it the risk of legal principles and practices of other jurisdictions influencing or interfering with our own, as the Court of Justice will have the ultimate say on how it is interpreted and applied.”

The decision-making process itself is a matter of concern as similar measures are almost randomly opted into. Two specific examples from the report are worth quoting. Why does the national interest require participation in a peer review of national capabilities to tackle organised crime but not terrorism? Why is it worth remaining in part of a network of contact points for exchanging information on the investigation of genocide but opting out of a related measure to investigate this crime? The terms “national interest” and “reputational risk” are used to justify opt-ins without any real explanation of their meaning or specific relevance. They are a catch-all for whatever the Government wants to do. Probably, as the Lord Chancellor said: “It is the nature of coalition governments that you have to reach collective agreements.” However, the Coalition agreement itself said that there would be no further transfer of power to Brussels and unless failing to exercise the block opt-out is deemed to be the status quo any opt-ins are a surrender of sovereignty.

Fortunately, there is still time before any irrevocable opt-in is confirmed. It will prove a real test of the Government’s mettle and of its leading figures’ dispositions. If they cede ground on this what prospect is there for renegotiation?

Jacob Rees-Mogg is the Conservative MP for North East Somerset

Stan - 14 Nov 2013 21:24 - 32837 of 81564

Hot off the press, Alwdgit went to school... It must be true because he said so.

goldfinger - 14 Nov 2013 22:31 - 32838 of 81564

Haystack - 14 Nov 2013 20:01 - 32835 of 32839

gf
The government hasn't done anything to the nurses. It is the various NHS trusts to save money. They are letting nurses not be replaced rather than cut the layers of management...............................ENDS

Hays whose running this country?????????, perhaphs youl say its still Labour lets face it your lot blame them for everything even though they are in their 4th year. I even remember one southern Tory blaming labour for the PASTY TAX........ my goodness.

Tories GET A GRIP.

Haystack - 14 Nov 2013 22:52 - 32839 of 81564

NHS trust have quite a high degree of autonomy concerning staffing and budgets. These trusts were introduced by the last Labour government. It was during the last government that the target culture dominated hospitals.

MaxK - 14 Nov 2013 22:57 - 32840 of 81564

You're flapping in the wind H, the top down stuff could have been changed by now.

Haystack - 14 Nov 2013 23:03 - 32841 of 81564

The trusts manage their own budgets. The government has asked the trusts to specify how many nurses it has on duty at any time due to low levels of cover.

MaxK - 14 Nov 2013 23:12 - 32842 of 81564

Where do the trusts get their money from?

MaxK - 14 Nov 2013 23:34 - 32843 of 81564



Roma community must be sensitive to British culture – Nick Clegg

Community's behaviour can be offensive, Nick Clegg says as David Blunkett tells government to recognise numbers here


Patrick Wintour, political editor


The Guardian, Thursday 14 November 2013 21.25 GMT

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/14/roma-community-sensitive-british-culture-nick-clegg


Nick Clegg warned the Roma community in Sheffield not to behave in an intimidatory way.


Nick Clegg has warned the Roma community in Sheffield not to be behave in an intimidatory way, as the former home secretary David Blunkett urged the government to do more to recognise the scale of the settled Roma community in the UK.

Earlier this week Blunkett said Roma groups from Slovakia settled in a district of Sheffield were behaving as if in a "downtrodden village or woodland".

Speaking on LBC the deputy prime minister said: "Of course I am acutely aware of the tensions. David Blunkett has been very outspoken about it and he has every reason to be concerned as the constituency MP. I am not sure, bluntly, if it helps very many people in Page Hall for him to then lurch around saying it is the government's fault."

Clegg, MP for Sheffield Hallam, added: "There is a real dilemma … when you get communities coming into a part of our country and then they behave in a way that people find quite difficult to accept.

"They behave in a way that people find sometimes intimidating, sometimes offensive. I think it is quite right that people should say. And on this, if not many other things, I actually agree with David Blunkett.

"We have every right to say if you are in Britain and you are coming to live in Britain and you are bringing up a family here, you have got to be sensitive to the way that life is lived in this country."

Blunkett, MP for Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough, feels the government has not set out a strategy for this community, and has accused the Department of Communities of burying its head in the sand over the scale of Roma migration. A recent report by Salford University based on a local authority survey suggested there were nearly 197,000 settled Roma in the UK, when Blunkett said the government believed there were only 50,000.

Blunkett also insisted that he has never warned that the tensions in his Sheffield constiuency could lead to riots, although he did warn of a possible "explosion" between different communities in the city.

He said: "I was talking to a broadcast journalist as we walked through the community most affected in my constituency and referred to the fact that she had been working in Bradford and was familiar with the damage done to the community back in 2001, when tensions had led to divisions which then led outsiders to create havoc including the consequently disturbances."

The Salford study found local authorities appear to have little contact with most migrant Roma populations, suggesting a high level of self-sufficiency.

This was largely attributed to migrant Roma mainly from Slovakia "tending to be accommodated in private rented housing and not engaging, in any perceptible way, with local authority services or with key statutory partners".

Dave Brown at Migration Yorkshire said the lack of a full government strategy on Roma inclusion reduced local authorities' flexibility to use EU structural funds for Roma inclusion. But he denied there was a sudden new problem with the Roma community.

Blunkett had spoken out on BBC Radio Sheffield about the Roma groups from Slovakia who had settled in a district of the city. He added: "We've got to be tough and robust in saying to people you are not in a downtrodden village or woodland, because many of them don't even live in areas where there are toilets or refuse collection facilities.

"You are not there any more, you are here – and you've got to adhere to our standards, and to our way of behaving, and if you do then you'll get a welcome and people will support you."

He said in the summer there had been problems with Roma groups congregating on street corners. The conflict appears to have been greatest with the Pakistani community.

He added: "We have got to change the behaviour and the culture of the incoming Roma community, because there's going to be an explosion otherwise. We all know that."

When pressed about the likely impact of Bulgarians and Romanians coming to the UK at the turn of the year, Clegg refused to make any prediction, citing the failure of the previous Labour government to judge the impact of opening the doors to eight eastern European countries in 2004, which was earlier than required by the EU. The former Labour home secretary Jack Straw described the policy as a "spectacular mistake" this week.

Clegg said: "The lesson we've learned from the previous government is, don't make loads of predictions that turn out to be completely untrue, because that is what destroys or undermines public confidence even further."

But he defended the need for the country to remain open to immigration: "We are nothing as a nation if we don't stay open to the rest of the world."

He added: "I am a liberal. I think one of the great things about our country is that we are open-hearted and generous-minded. The NHS would keel over if it did not have people coming to this country to work for it. Of course we should welcome people that want to play by the rules, pay their taxes and contribute to public life."

He pointed out that there are lots of people that come to Britain and then invest and create jobs, and medical professionals who come to treat British patients.

goldfinger - 15 Nov 2013 04:49 - 32844 of 81564

Flapping Hays flapping on the NHS A@E

Look the Tory government are in charge so dont blame it on trust management who could be fired at the drop of an hat.

Admit your lot are making a right cock up of it instead of trying to switch blame. Nos 10 know they face a tough winter see my guido falks post at beginning of yesterday.

goldfinger - 15 Nov 2013 04:52 - 32845 of 81564

Hays here you are from the inside at nos 10.......................

NOVEMBER 14TH, 2013

No.10 ‘Crippled With Fear’ Over Coming NHS Crisis



As Dave jets off on another one of his travelling salesman tours, he leaves behind a Downing Street operation in a bit of a flap. There is a growing mood within No. 10 and Whitehall that as the good economic news keeps coming, and recovery strengthens the government’s self-claimed central purpose will slip down the agenda. Instead of talking about the economy, the next couple of years will focus on other issues and problems. The NHS, Universal Credit and Romanian/Bulgarian immigration are causing the most sleepless nights.

Sources claim Craig Oliver is particularly concerned about the NHS and a bucket of bad news set to come down the line. Crisis talks have been held between the Department of Health, No. 10 and the Cabinet Office. When Department of Health officials were asked when the good news from the NHS reforms would start to trickle through, the reply was “never”. Winter is coming, and one SpAd tells Guido the Tories are ‘crippled with fear’, if it is a cold winter, fuel poverty and the NHS will come together as a perfect storm, with higher senior citizen mortality…


Stan - 15 Nov 2013 08:18 - 32846 of 81564

Is anyone else listening to this time wasting Tory backslider Hunt on R4 now?

MaxK - 15 Nov 2013 08:34 - 32847 of 81564

Amazon urged to withdrew 'racist' golly fancy dress costume

Amazon, the online retail giant, have not responded to calls for the golly fancy dress costume, based on a racist character, to be removed from their website





By Hayley Dixon

7:53AM GMT 15 Nov 2013



Amazon has been urged to withdraw an “offensive and demeaning” fancy dress costume of a golly.


The outfit, based upon the racist character, is advertised on the online retail giant's website as an Adult Golly Fancy Dress Costume priced at £39.99, reduced from £47.99.


It is not the only Golly item for sale on the site, as a search for the term returned 3,846 results.


Amongst other items Amazon advertises “Golly” soft toys, a “Traditional Golliwog” in Scottish fancy dress for £12.99, A “Golly design” ceramic mug for £3.95, a “Golly Golliwog Golliwogg Key Ring” for £6.99 and an “I love Golly” baby bib for £7.02.


Helen Pattison, of Britain's Youth Against Racism, told the Sun: "Yet again Amazon has shown they will sell highly offensive and demeaning products, as long as they can make a profit."



More outrage here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/10451228/Amazon-urged-to-withdrew-racist-golly-fancy-dress-costume.html

Fred1new - 15 Nov 2013 09:28 - 32848 of 81564

Hays.

One of Maggie's brilliant ideas, which was for many the root of the NHS problems and produced change after change, loss of continuity and loss moral in the service.

It was the beginning of telling the medical profession that they were business men and many went out to prove it.

"In 1990, the National Health Service & Community Care Act (in England) defined this "internal market", whereby Health Authorities ceased to run hospitals but "purchased" care from their own or other authorities' hospitals. Certain GPs became "fund holders" and were able to purchase care for their patients. The "providers" became NHS trusts, which encouraged competition but also increased local differences."



They were taught to watch their back pockets and not the patient's condition.

2517GEORGE - 15 Nov 2013 09:30 - 32849 of 81564

'Nick Clegg warned the Roma community in Sheffield not to behave in an intimidatory way'.
That's bound to sort them out then.
2517

MaxK - 15 Nov 2013 10:09 - 32850 of 81564

Haystack - 15 Nov 2013 10:29 - 32851 of 81564

This what happens to socialist leaders.

François Hollande hits new lows

François Hollande's popularity now stands at 15 per cent amongst French public

Francois Hollande is the most unpopular French president in history

11:50AM GMT 14 Nov 2013

François Hollande's approval rating has hit new lows, shedding six percentage points in a month with only 15 per cent of respondents now backing the beleaguered French president, a poll has found.

The finding is in line with other recent polls which have shown Mr Hollande's standing with voters tumbling after a brief upturn at the end of the summer.

Asked how they judged Mr Hollande's actions as president three per cent of respondents to the YouGov poll for the Huffington Post and said they had a very positive opinion and 12 per cent said it was positive.

Seventy-six per cent said they had a rather negative or very negative opinion. Nine per cent would not comment.

The downturn follows the exposure of record unemployment, rising taxes and weak growth amid a growing nationwide feeling of despondency due to job cuts and factory closures.

Haystack - 15 Nov 2013 10:41 - 32852 of 81564

Al-Qaeda-linked rebels have said sorry for decapitating a fellow extremist by accident.

Militant Islamist rebels in Syria linked to al-Qaeda have asked for "understanding and forgiveness" for cutting off and putting on display the wrong man's head

Knife-wielding members of Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham were shown in a video triumphantly displaying a bearded head before a crowd.

But the head was recognised from the video as belonging to a member of Ahrar al-Sham, a Sunni Islamist rebel group that often fights alongside ISIS.

After inquiries, an ISIS spokesman admitted he was the wrong man.

Sheepishly explaining the error rebels made reference to a story in which Mohammed said Allah would forgive a man who killed a believer in error.

The news comes after Al-Qaeda took to Twitter to show users how to "kindly" cut off a human head... because they don't want to seem violent.

An article in the Lebanese daily al-Safir examined al-Qaeda's increasing use of social media networks and media technology in spreading its ideology.

Fred1new - 15 Nov 2013 12:48 - 32853 of 81564

I think the clothes peg should be on the other's nose.

With a a note saying the shiny arse is in town.


doodlebug4 - 15 Nov 2013 16:25 - 32854 of 81564

“The Indians have successfully launched a rocket to Mars,” says Rod Liddle in The Sun. “This, despite being unable to feed half their population. It is now seemingly compulsory for all recipients of UK aid to send rockets pinging across the solar system. Perhaps the Indian rocket will bump into Nigeria’s on its way? Yep, they’ve got one too.The bloke heading India’s space programme said spending billions on a rocket is good for their morale.Yeah, sure. Not for the morale of every UK taxpayer, though.”
Register now or login to post to this thread.