Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Hays Hays Hays, another poll JUST OUT.

Get ready to cream yourself...............

electionista ‏@electionista 30s
UK - Populus poll:

CON 35%
LAB 35%
LDEM 9%
UKIP 13%

Rekon its a rougue poll, due to Easter break.

But you can never charge ME of hiding or supressing the results/truth. I say it as it says.

Pity same cant be said of Davy, Giddeon and more so IDS.

hey sticky, that 40 seat majority for labour must be a racing certainty now :-)

By the way im sitting on some POTENTIAL mind blowing political/ humane gravy that will rock the established core to the ground if it comes into being and I think the odds are very much stacked in my favour. 21 days to the outcome and counting.

THIS COULD BE MASSIVE.

Cyners these Bank holiday polls often throw up falseys just like Cheryl Coles tits.

Thought id give Hays a sexual lift LOL LOL.

No one will care about the FOI case to be ruled on in 21 days time.

oh well, here's one for a chuckle that's just popped up on the net ......

UKIP has defended a senior party official who placed an advert in a local paper saying women should stay at home and "cash-strapped Moslems" should have multiple wives.
David Challice, an activist in Exeter, also hit out at the "lunacy of multiculturalism" and described Greeks as "vile".

If any party was heading down the Fascist route it is UKIP. Funny how NF has just the right initials. Nearly all the similar parties in Europe have those initials such as Nuovo Fronteria in Italy.

EU's court could next week rule in favour of taxation without representation in Europe


By Mats Persson Economics Last updated: April 25th, 2014



The EU’s court, the ECJ, is on Wednesday expected to deliver a key ruling on whether it’s legal for a group of EU countries – including Germany and France – to pursue a financial transaction tax (FTT) which also has an impact on the countries not participating, including the UK. The case is big.

Taxes on financial transactions usually falter – look at Sweden in the 1980s or Italy and France now. Even if you think that "banks should pay for the crisis", which is a perfectly legitimate position, a transaction tax is a terrible way to go about it, since transactions move elsewhere or costs are passed on. In a desperate attempt at avoiding this, the European Commission has effectively opted for taxing the entire universe. Any equity, bond or derivative transaction involving a party in the FTT-zone and one outside will be taxed. So all transactions of this type between, say, Deutsche Bank and Barclays will be taxed with the revenue likely going to the German government. Yet, London no longer has any say on the actual proposal since it is being pursued under a quirk in the EU treaties known as "enhanced cooperation" – allowing a sub-set of countries to press ahead with more integration if an agreement involving all EU countries isn’t possible.



http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/matspersson/100027121/eus-court-could-next-week-rule-in-favour-of-taxation-without-representation-in-europe/

Surely the above represents fundamental change?


Where's the referendum??

Haystack - 25 Apr 2014 15:02 - 39942 of 39947

No one will care about the FOI case to be ruled on in 21 days time.............ends

ohhhhhh is that so Hays. Well I happen to be privy to further legal developments since the TRIBUNAL yesterday at which the DWP DIDNT EVEN ATTEND.

This is a tinder box ready to go off.

I have been asked to divulge no further information I have received, but rest assured I will report back to you my loyal muckers here on this thread when the shit hits the fan...........BIG TIME.

Osbourne in big trouble with RBS.

200% bonus isnt enough the bwankers say. God help us.

This is a non party political post.........we have to do something and forget party politics and also embrace international cooperation.

Lets face it its now got to the point where this group of people are holding the World to ransom.

What would you do gf?

GF,

Agreed.

Europe first.

Those of the "free world" who agree!

.

Max, just report back what as happened, BUT this is explosive stuff. Very explosive stuff when the Media get thet hands on it.

Sorry i cant be more specific at this time.

Hays broadly knows what I mean, but hasnt latched on yet as to why its such a sensitive issue.

Lets just say the DWP didnt turn up to a tribunal and therefore left themselves bare assed open to the attack that took place on them. The tribunal team were to say the least not very impressed by their actions on the day.

Hays says 21 days, it could be a lot faster than that, watch this space.

ps, sorry wires crosssed Max on my post s above.

Your meaning what would you do re- Bankers bonus as is Fred.

Ill post over the weekend.

Im falling asleep here at the wheel.

Been out fishing ohh that fresh air and the ale that follows, lethal combination.

goldfinger

With CFD and spread bets , would you have to extend the time frame of the trade if the amount you have to trade is small , say 1 day to 4 or more with an amount of only £500 to £1,000 to bet because of the cost of small trades , you would need a higher % gain

Revealed: Labour's 'stealth raid' took £118BILLION off pensions, 'paving the way for the end of final salary schemes as they were suddenly unaffordable'

Gordon Brown scrapped tax relief on pension firms' dividends in 1997
Move blamed for wrecking industry and decimating final-salary schemes
Published: 00:17, 26 April 2014

The devastating impact of Labour’s infamous raid on pensions can be laid bare today.

Official figures reveal that the tax grab has saved the Treasury – and cost workers – £118billion since 1997.

In one of his first decisions as chancellor, Gordon Brown scrapped tax relief on pension firms’ dividends.

The move is blamed for wrecking a once thriving industry and fuelling the closure of many final salary schemes.

Analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility shows it has saved the Treasury almost £7billion a year – £2billion more than Mr Brown had expected.

The annual gain is expected to top £9.7billion this year with £117.9billion saved between 1997 and 2014.

The OBR quietly published the figures on its website this week.

Ros Altmann, a former Downing Street pension adviser, said Labour’s move marked ‘the beginning of the end of the gold standard pension that British workers could rely on from their boss’.

She added: ‘This is money that has come out of people’s pensions. It paved the way for the end of final salary schemes because it made them so much more expensive. They were suddenly unaffordable.’

Since 1997, the number of private sector workers with a defined benefit pension has collapsed from 5million to 1.7million.

In 1997, 34 per cent of staff at private sector firms were in a final salary – or defined benefit – scheme. By 2012, this had slumped to just 8 per cent – just one in 12.

Asda scrapped its scheme in 2010 and Sainsbury’s shut its scheme to new members eight years earlier.