Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Exactly, their was a programme on TV last week showing a bloke who lived and worked in Brent £150 take home pay per week working in a shop and had to go and live in Wolves, but he still commutes back to do his job each day.

His wifes wage just keeps them afloat.

Madness complete madness.

And IDS says he wants people to find work.

Social Cleansing at its worst and this is just the beginning.

GF

Hoi! Twat.

I said:

"Some people on here, such as Goldfinger, curse Ian Duncan Smith,................."

Fact: Yes, you do. What I said therefore, is totally and utterly correct.

PS. When you, for example call someone 'a slag', it's grammatacticly (I invented this word) correct to say "you're" and which is the short form of "you are".

"Your", which is what you say, is the possessive pronoun; as in "your bigoted posts".

Time for you to go back to Junior School, and learn a second language, such as "English", eh?

Why is it social cleansing if people cannot afford to live in expensive areas.

Perhaps I could complain of social cleansing because I cannot afford to live in Park Lane or Eaton Square. Maybe the government should subsidise me.

And me!

Just in from Nigel Farage:

"Can you really trust Dodgy Dave and his "Cast-Iron" guarantees of an in/out referendum? Take a look at our video below to find out."

I am in favour of better grammar, but probably preferable not to call Hilary names at all gf.

ExecLine fitered. Ignorant Idiots like him coming over from advfn who have been marginalised there, not required here.

Bye Bye half pint.

Miliband in denial!




Labour's poll rating falls to four year low

YouGov for the Sun put Conservative and Labour neck and neck on 34% each.

It is the lowest rating for Labour since July 2010 - before Ed Miliband took over as leader. Ukip were on 15% and the Liberal Democrats 8%.

Mr Miliband tried to shrug off insisted he is "more personally competent" to run the country than David Cameron.

Hays is Brent really relatively speaking ie, in relation to other parts of London , an expensive area!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ha ha he he ho ho...... Hays Hays Hays ........just out 4 minutes ago.............

electionista @electionista · 4m
UK - Ipsos MORI poll:

LAB 34%
CON 31%
UKIP 11%
LDEM 9%
GRN 8%

Thats put a bee in your bonnet Hays LOL. he he.

Couldnt have timed it better. LOL.

Parts of it are, like any area. The principle is the same. If you can't afford to live somewhere, you have to move. It happens all the time. Someone has a business and it fails. The family have to sell up and move. Why should we subsidise people to live in areas that they cannot afford. I certainly don't want to. It has always been that way. People left Ireland, Scotland, Italy and moved even to other countries for a better life. If you live somewhere you cannot afford then move to somewhere that you can afford. If I had a Ferrari on HP and could not keep up the payments, should I complain and say the government should keep me in that lifestyle?

And another one LOL, he must be looking down on me him up there he he .

electionista @electionista · 4m
UK - Opinium #EP2014 poll:

UKIP 30%
LAB 28%
CON 22%
LDEM 7%
GRN 5%

gf
Look at the poll figures for UKIP; 9%. That's less than half than they need to get even one MP.

Hays why should we have subsidised Gary Barlow then.?

I hear this tax bill is going to bankrupt him. Sky news monday..

GF

You say:

"ExecLine fitered. Ignorant Idiots like him coming over from advfn who have been marginalised there, not required here.

Bye Bye half pint."

ExecLine fitered: Whatever

Ignorant: Incorrect.
Idiots: Incorrect.
like him: How do you know I'm a him? You might be incorrect again.
coming over from advfn: Incorrect.
who have been marginalised there: Incorrect.
not required here: Says who? You? But you are mostly incorrect on what you say.

Bye Bye half pint: Hee Hee. You stupid daft twat. I weigh in at just over 16 stone. So totally and utterly incorrect again.

We shouldn't subsidise Barlow. He was only trying to minimise his tax and was probably involved in the scheme via his accountant. It wasn't illegal. The scheme was found to be an artificial device for avoiding tax and not a legitimate investment. I know people who have been involved in schemes involving subsidies to do with trees. I wonder if those schemes may go belly up.

Well Hays for once you are consistent.

But to blame his accountant......ohhh come on.

His accountant carries no blame?

Who was advising him??

Here's a definition of a Neo-Cheat:

A Neo-Cheat is someone who creates a false cause, an untruth or perhaps even a mysticism, so as to then set up what he has created as 'a yardstick', or 'rule' or as 'the norm'. He creates this so as to use it so as to try to win his arguments or gain an advantage over others.
'
Of course, 'Neo-Cheating' is 'cheating' and no one likes being cheated. Neither do they like someone who is a cheat. Unless or until you know what 'neo-cheating' actually is, you'll find the cheating that is being used as being quite hard to detect.

Qn. What is the best way to deal with a Neo-Cheat?
Ans. Dump him. If you challenge him he will merely invent, raise, bring in, use, etc, etc, yet another 'false cause' to try to win his argument with it.

As Goldfinger continues to 'neo-cheat' on here I will try to spot the false causes he uses and point them out to you.

I would guess, that from his quite miserable unhappy attitude, which he illustrates to us on here, he is currently losing quite a lot of money with his trading. If it were otherwise, don't you think he would be quite happy, jovial and altruistically minded towards others?