andy.lovell
- 04 Nov 2002 11:26
If you're having any problems, or want to suggest some improvements, please post below!
Level2 changes
In the last few weeks we've needed to implement some code changes to make us compliant with the LSE's rules on the access of Level2 data.
The following requirement is now in place:
You can only use 1 program on 1 computer to access Level2 on MoneyAM using a single username.
This means that you are able to view as many Level2 windows using any one particular browser, or program, that you wish, however you will not be able to use both Firefox and Internet Explorer at the same time (the same goes for using Quote Tracker or TradeSeeker at the same time as viewing it using a web browser)
If you find you're being logged off of MoneyAM's Level2 with the message 'you've logged on from another location' then check the above and make sure you're not running any other programs at the same time before reporting this as a bug.
The Other Kevin
- 17 Feb 2006 10:14
- 4414 of 7315
Ian - Email sent
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 17 Feb 2006 10:22
- 4415 of 7315
Thanks TOK, JT has replied we have enough info from you to keep us going so thanks for that.
Ian
ravey davy gravy
- 21 Feb 2006 08:17
- 4416 of 7315
Anybody else having problems with monitor and L2 ?
ravey davy gravy
- 21 Feb 2006 08:20
- 4417 of 7315
Ah it's working again, maybe the slowness is my end.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 21 Feb 2006 08:21
- 4418 of 7315
ravey,
we have a problem with a few of our servers - JT is working on this and hoepfully normal service should be resumed in a few minutes,
Ian
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 21 Feb 2006 08:26
- 4419 of 7315
Ravey,
Apologies for that it should now be back up and running at full speed,
Ian
ravey davy gravy
- 21 Feb 2006 08:41
- 4421 of 7315
Thanks chaps.
dell314
- 24 Feb 2006 07:52
- 4422 of 7315
Morning.
Can you give your news provider a prod, as about 90% of this morning's RNS are missing.
Also, is there any chance that you could remove any post from this thread which is just someone trying to be funny, rather than discussion of a bug?
Trying to catch up with recent posts to see if any of them are particularly relevant becomes something of a chore, when various individuals seem to think the thread is a substitute for friendsreunited.
Many thanks,
dell
bhunt1910
- 24 Feb 2006 08:13
- 4424 of 7315
Why is the SEO RNS not showing please ??
dell314
- 24 Feb 2006 08:22
- 4425 of 7315
JTullet - thanks for prodding the news boys.
Re the other point, I'd imagine that yourself and the MoneyAM team use this thread continuously, so hardly notice a few off topic posts. However, one assumes that many others only come here when they have a problem, or to find out if there is any feedback on something they reported a month or two ago(Yeah, right!!).
i.e. This morning, there were around 120 posts, since I last looked in(which must be quite positive, as I obviously don't feel the need to moan very often!).
I could either use the recent button and miss any feedback that may be relevant to my previous queries, or have to read a large amount of drivel between the technical points.
I therefore maintain that blanking out irrelevant posts on this thread is a fine idea but it's your trainset!
Cheers,
dell
P.S. bhunt - If you read the two posts above yours, you'll appreciate that AM's news provider has most of the early RNS missing. Hemscott appears to have a full list, if that helps.
bhunt1910
- 24 Feb 2006 08:53
- 4430 of 7315
Sorry about that - still had sleep in my eyes - my excuse anyway
Andy
- 24 Feb 2006 16:40
- 4431 of 7315
Iant,
Just a quick question.
I started the FDI thread last year, and put 2005 in the header.
This one
Is there anyway that the "2005" can be removed from the header please?
Or if not, changed to "2006", or changed to "2005 - to date", something like that.
I want to keep the thread, but the 2005 sort of dates it.
TIA.
Andy.
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 24 Feb 2006 16:43
- 4432 of 7315
Andy,
Let me know which one you want and I will change it for you now.
Ian
Andy
- 24 Feb 2006 18:26
- 4433 of 7315
Iant,
The header in this thread please.
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7384#lastread
It's the "2005" that would be better deleted altogether if possible, or simpy changed as I suggested above.
Many thanks indeed,
Andy.