keith thomas
- 20 Apr 2004 17:06
will it ever recover to the 38p i paid for them??
proptrade
- 21 Oct 2005 11:14
- 466 of 520
Llcom - shorting is the other side of markets and is a necessary evil in the developed mkts of the world. in as much as i may like a stock you have the right (if you can find the borrow) to take the other side of that trade.
this stock has only small shorts - i mean it is a scrappy name with a few holders and the borrow is strictly limited. trading over a few days maybe but hardly a bear stock like partygaming etc. CFD's and spreads have limits they can short and is almost too small for some of these guys anyway.
Llcom - if the company can survive, take the bears on and buy some. their downside could be as exponential as your upside and if they are involved a few buyers will see these get VERY squeezy.
15p by xmas (after a succesful placing)
stockdog
- 21 Oct 2005 15:48
- 467 of 520
Thanks everyone, moneyman, partridge, Llcom and Proptrade - great posts with serious research and intelligence behind them. I know proptrade would be first to admit his opinion means nothing in the face of Mr Market, but I LOVE hearing it, since I did not get in at 5p - think of that number and multiply by a little bit more than 2 ! However, I to believe in the product enormously, if only they can get enough cash to survive. I buy p/t's analysis that today's news probably allows them to raise more in the market to get through another 12 months.
If not we can liquidate the company and share the proceeds in specie - I'll need a box by the time my family find out how much I lost them! (Don't want to sound tooooo depressing, Moneyman!)
sd
LIcom
- 21 Oct 2005 16:43
- 468 of 520
Hi stockdog,
I understand your view. I once felt there was nothing wrong with shorting. In fact, I was hopeful on a number of occasions that I would be able to mop a few share up on the cheap. Company's are not in a position to Hoover up their own shares when subjected to shorting. Would it be ethical? I doubt it. In most cases, the companies targeted need their funds for more important matters. I for one would not be best pleased I found out that a company I had a position in was risking limited funds in the market in such a way.
Smaller entrepreneurial companies that need that final push before commercialisation, often need new funding, this can be made harder by shorting activities. At the very least, more shares may need to be issues to raise the same money, thus further dilution to existing shares. Another useful point make is the threat to small companies in the pre-commercialisation stage, when making losses, or still worse, when researching or designing, and without turnover are at their most vulnerable. Some will argue that short selling offers the astute investor a chance to buy at a discount after shorters have ravished a company.
When dealing with an innovating small cap with potential, a large short - using borrowed shares as in a spread bet or CFD,- can reduces the share price against the true reflection of the business, and sends out a false signal.
Fundamentally, there may be nothing wrong with the company. By that I mean the company is not about to go belly up; but has a recognised strategy, and that may be about to yield real shareholder value for those that have stuck with the company through its early stages. A relatively new trading strategy is fast becoming the norm for some. Seek out high percentage gainers, adopt the contrarian view, and short on the over bought opinion and ride it down.
The is more to shorting than the damage to smaller companies. Pension funds are at risk too. People have been forced to continue to work due to poor pension performance. Which I ironic when you think about it. Most of the shares borrowed by shorters, are held by institutions.
Sorry if this sound like a right old moan.
moneyman
- 03 Nov 2005 21:53
- 469 of 520
Looking cheap again folks.
TGD
- 04 Nov 2005 14:28
- 470 of 520
Price moving up on heavy buying whats happening ?????
AdieH
- 04 Nov 2005 14:36
- 471 of 520
Look at the RNS, abit strange because I thought ARX feel out with Watermark previously about sales etc, would be a hell of a turnabout if this is the same watermark, any views???
slmchow
- 04 Nov 2005 14:47
- 472 of 520
yes very strange indeed.... Have watermark obtained an order for aerobox?
http://www.watermark.co.uk/
links
about us/press
For Immediate Release:
Contact:
Mr Russ Colbourne
Watermark Ltd
Office +44 (0) 208 6061300
E-Mail: russc@watermark.co.uk
Watermark Appointed Exclusive Middle East Agents for the AeroBox evolutionary Unit Load Device (ULD) following significant US$6million Contract
London November 3, 2005 Watermark Limited (www.watermark.co.uk) is pleased to announce that AeroBox Composite Structures (ACS), the US subsidiary of Aerobox plc (www.aeroboxplc.com), has appointed Watermark Limited, a subsidiary of Watermark Group plc, as the exclusive sales agent for AeroBox products within the Middle East region and parts of Asia. Watermarks appointment comes after successfully negotiating a 5 year supply agreement for AeroBox composite containers with an order value in excess of US$6,000,000.
Over the past 2 years the AeroBox ULD has been utilised by over 25 airlines around the world and has flown over 80,000 sectors resulting in less than 100 incidents of damage. Since receiving certification from both the UK Civil Aviation Authority and the US Federal Aviation Authority the cost saving containers have been bought by forward thinking and innovative purchasers in North America, South America, Europe, and the Middle East.
Watermark CEO, John Caulcutt, commented that "I am delighted to re-establish the opportunity of marketing the cost saving AeroBox containers, following various product improvements initiated by the new management team at ACS and we are confident of selling further AeroBox containers within the Middle East and Asian region".
Ray Gibbs, Group Managing Director of AeroBox plc, added that, "We expect Watermark to quickly increase the AeroBox ULDs in operational use. The solid bi-fold door container is specially targeted at the Middle East and Asia when compared to other AKE products in the ACS portfolio. Watermark have strong, recognised relationships within the airline community, and we fully expect this initial contract to be the first in a number of long term supply agreements in this region.
Notes to Editors
The AeroBox evolutionary air cargo and baggage container is the result of 10 years research and development. The AeroBox dispenses with a metal frame. It is made from Aeroplaz panels which are simply bolted together. The lightweight thermoplastic composite provides great strength, toughness and durability reducing the need for repairs and greatly extending the life and serviceability of the ULDs. Image Library available at: http://www.aeroboxplc.com/html/gallery/index.htm
loadsadosh
- 04 Nov 2005 14:49
- 473 of 520
AdieH
can find nothing could you point me in the right direction
Loadsa
katcenka
- 04 Nov 2005 15:16
- 474 of 520
12p on the way, ARX will have to announce it, they have been caught with there pants down
nkirkup
- 04 Nov 2005 15:24
- 475 of 520
The order was stated in their RNS dated 26/10/05, although Watermark now acting as agents
stockdog
- 04 Nov 2005 19:06
- 476 of 520
"I am delighted to re-establish the opportunity"
It is the same Watermark. My reading is that the old management had a personality split with (old?) Watermark. Now there is new management( on both sides?) they are free to behave in a more adult fashion and capitalise on each other's strengths. Good decision, good management, good trrades today.
sd
SARAHA
- 05 Nov 2005 19:42
- 477 of 520
ARE THEY WORTH BUYING AT 7.38
katcenka
- 06 Nov 2005 17:26
- 478 of 520
Nope, not worth buying at all, and this is why
Sorry chaps, there will be no RNS re the watermark deal, I got a response to the email I sent on Friday... so it was all piss and wind... Knowing your a naught boy..
From : ray gibbs
Sent : Saturday, 5 November 2005 10:24:49 PM
To : "'JOJN P'"
Subject : RE: shareholder Urgent question re Watermark
| | | Inbox
Dear Sir,
Our announcement covered the financial aspects of the contract to appraise
the market of a matter that was deemed price sensitive. We were advised that
the agency agreement is a normal business matter and not as such an
announceable event. Obviously the receipt of future orders will be a matter
to consider advising the market so that our financial performance can be
reappraised in light of new information that may effect our future trading
and subsequently the share price.
Ray Gibbs
Group Managing Director
katcenka
- 07 Nov 2005 16:43
- 479 of 520
doom and gloom
moneyman
- 15 Nov 2005 21:41
- 480 of 520
Shame everyone is missing out on this ! What action today....is there news on the way ?
fletch61
- 26 Nov 2005 10:31
- 481 of 520
Did everyone see the tick up last trades Friday, more action Monday !!! worth looking at first thing.
Red Underwing
- 26 Nov 2005 18:57
- 482 of 520
Yes!
A very obvious late buying run, but not a huge sum involved! Quite concentrated after 16:00.
Lets hope it was meaningful!
Fly by Night
Red
Crazyfrog
- 26 Nov 2005 22:54
- 483 of 520
Looked at the trades for a few weeks, seems every friday there is a rally for shares and then they drop the price the following week, is this simply not another trap.
moneyman
- 30 Nov 2005 23:50
- 484 of 520
Look how cagey the MMs are ! Is news expected ? According to a poster on ADVFN there is a two day presentation to institutions taking place !
moneyman
- 07 Dec 2005 09:32
- 485 of 520
Interesting rise today. Is it the precursor to news ?