will it ever recover to the 38p i paid for them??

Thanks everyone, moneyman, partridge, Llcom and Proptrade - great posts with serious research and intelligence behind them. I know proptrade would be first to admit his opinion means nothing in the face of Mr Market, but I LOVE hearing it, since I did not get in at 5p - think of that number and multiply by a little bit more than 2 ! However, I to believe in the product enormously, if only they can get enough cash to survive. I buy p/t's analysis that today's news probably allows them to raise more in the market to get through another 12 months.

If not we can liquidate the company and share the proceeds in specie - I'll need a box by the time my family find out how much I lost them! (Don't want to sound tooooo depressing, Moneyman!)

sd

Hi stockdog,

I understand your view. I once felt there was nothing wrong with shorting. In fact, I was hopeful on a number of occasions that I would be able to mop a few share up on the cheap. Company's are not in a position to Hoover up their own shares when subjected to shorting. Would it be ethical? I doubt it. In most cases, the companies targeted need their funds for more important matters. I for one would not be best pleased I found out that a company I had a position in was risking limited funds in the market in such a way.

Smaller entrepreneurial companies that need that final push before commercialisation, often need new funding, this can be made harder by shorting activities. At the very least, more shares may need to be issues to raise the same money, thus further dilution to existing shares. Another useful point make is the threat to small companies in the pre-commercialisation stage, when making losses, or still worse, when researching or designing, and without turnover are at their most vulnerable. Some will argue that short selling offers the astute investor a chance to buy at a discount after shorters have ravished a company.

When dealing with an innovating small cap with potential, a large short - using borrowed shares as in a spread bet or CFD,- can reduces the share price against the true reflection of the business, and sends out a false signal.

Fundamentally, there may be nothing wrong with the company. By that I mean the company is not about to go belly up; but has a recognised strategy, and that may be about to yield real shareholder value for those that have stuck with the company through its early stages. A relatively new trading strategy is fast becoming the norm for some. Seek out high percentage gainers, adopt the contrarian view, and short on the over bought opinion and ride it down.

The is more to shorting than the damage to smaller companies. Pension funds are at risk too. People have been forced to continue to work due to poor pension performance. Which I ironic when you think about it. Most of the shares borrowed by shorters, are held by institutions.

Sorry if this sound like a right old moan.

Looking cheap again folks.

Price moving up on heavy buying whats happening ?????

Look at the RNS, abit strange because I thought ARX feel out with Watermark previously about sales etc, would be a hell of a turnabout if this is the same watermark, any views???

yes very strange indeed.... Have watermark obtained an order for aerobox?

http://www.watermark.co.uk/

links

about us/press



For Immediate Release:

Contact:
Mr Russ Colbourne
Watermark Ltd
Office +44 (0) 208 6061300
E-Mail: russc@watermark.co.uk


Watermark Appointed Exclusive Middle East Agents for the AeroBox evolutionary Unit Load Device (ULD) following significant US$6million Contract


London November 3, 2005 Watermark Limited (www.watermark.co.uk) is pleased to announce that AeroBox Composite Structures (ACS), the US subsidiary of Aerobox plc (www.aeroboxplc.com), has appointed Watermark Limited, a subsidiary of Watermark Group plc, as the exclusive sales agent for AeroBox products within the Middle East region and parts of Asia. Watermarks appointment comes after successfully negotiating a 5 year supply agreement for AeroBox composite containers with an order value in excess of US$6,000,000.

Over the past 2 years the AeroBox ULD has been utilised by over 25 airlines around the world and has flown over 80,000 sectors resulting in less than 100 incidents of damage. Since receiving certification from both the UK Civil Aviation Authority and the US Federal Aviation Authority the cost saving containers have been bought by forward thinking and innovative purchasers in North America, South America, Europe, and the Middle East.

Watermark CEO, John Caulcutt, commented that "I am delighted to re-establish the opportunity of marketing the cost saving AeroBox containers, following various product improvements initiated by the new management team at ACS and we are confident of selling further AeroBox containers within the Middle East and Asian region".

Ray Gibbs, Group Managing Director of AeroBox plc, added that, "We expect Watermark to quickly increase the AeroBox ULDs in operational use. The solid bi-fold door container is specially targeted at the Middle East and Asia when compared to other AKE products in the ACS portfolio. Watermark have strong, recognised relationships within the airline community, and we fully expect this initial contract to be the first in a number of long term supply agreements in this region.

Notes to Editors
The AeroBox evolutionary air cargo and baggage container is the result of 10 years research and development. The AeroBox dispenses with a metal frame. It is made from Aeroplaz panels which are simply bolted together. The lightweight thermoplastic composite provides great strength, toughness and durability reducing the need for repairs and greatly extending the life and serviceability of the ULDs. Image Library available at: http://www.aeroboxplc.com/html/gallery/index.htm

AdieH
can find nothing could you point me in the right direction
Loadsa

12p on the way, ARX will have to announce it, they have been caught with there pants down

The order was stated in their RNS dated 26/10/05, although Watermark now acting as agents

"I am delighted to re-establish the opportunity"

It is the same Watermark. My reading is that the old management had a personality split with (old?) Watermark. Now there is new management( on both sides?) they are free to behave in a more adult fashion and capitalise on each other's strengths. Good decision, good management, good trrades today.

sd

ARE THEY WORTH BUYING AT 7.38

Nope, not worth buying at all, and this is why

Sorry chaps, there will be no RNS re the watermark deal, I got a response to the email I sent on Friday... so it was all piss and wind... Knowing your a naught boy..

From : ray gibbs
Sent : Saturday, 5 November 2005 10:24:49 PM
To : "'JOJN P'"
Subject : RE: shareholder Urgent question re Watermark

| | | Inbox


Dear Sir,

Our announcement covered the financial aspects of the contract to appraise
the market of a matter that was deemed price sensitive. We were advised that
the agency agreement is a normal business matter and not as such an
announceable event. Obviously the receipt of future orders will be a matter
to consider advising the market so that our financial performance can be
reappraised in light of new information that may effect our future trading
and subsequently the share price.

Ray Gibbs
Group Managing Director

doom and gloom

Shame everyone is missing out on this ! What action today....is there news on the way ?

Did everyone see the tick up last trades Friday, more action Monday !!! worth looking at first thing.

Yes!
A very obvious late buying run, but not a huge sum involved! Quite concentrated after 16:00.

Lets hope it was meaningful!


Fly by Night

Red

Looked at the trades for a few weeks, seems every friday there is a rally for shares and then they drop the price the following week, is this simply not another trap.

Look how cagey the MMs are ! Is news expected ? According to a poster on ADVFN there is a two day presentation to institutions taking place !

Interesting rise today. Is it the precursor to news ?

Is this the end for ARX?