goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 07 Oct 2014 15:38
- 46995 of 81564
Manuel,
You were referring to middle east in one of your rambling posts.
Get somebody to keep you awake and have a look at this HardTalk interview.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b04knjl4/hardtalk-general-lord-richards-chief-of-the-defence-staff-british-armed-forces-201013
------------------------
Gf,
Post 46987
I can remember how the "new technological age" was heralded by the politicians and the media.
The advances in industrial engineering.
The reduction is heavy manual work and hours needed to accomplish "projects".
That was the 50s-60s-70s and so on.
I do not see why work is so lauded by many, who wouldn't know whats a many "manual worker's" day actually consist of, or the "miserable forms of work" of some of those in the "lower strata" of society.
More often than not those who lord it over others owe their "positions",or own standard of living, more to inherited wealth or the opportunity is availed them than their ability.
The other thing is, while I can see the necessity to "provide" for lean years by producing more than immediately necessary when conditions are favourable, overproduction especially of "glitter" or "marketable goods produce which have no intrinsic value in themselves" and are produced to gain a monetary advantage seem a daft driver of an "economy". It seems to only to increase the greed and consequential divisions of a society.
------
Is that understandable?
Fred1new
- 07 Oct 2014 15:42
- 46996 of 81564
What I am saying simply is the Etonian type cabal wish who they see as less desirable to work longer for less in order to fill they pockets more!
Stand in line all of you, and show respect to your leaders!
cynic
- 07 Oct 2014 15:50
- 46997 of 81564
you really do post a load of tripe at times
makes my stuff look like prime sirloin
goldfinger
- 07 Oct 2014 15:52
- 46998 of 81564
Very Fred.
Theirs a one or two on this thread aswel who have all had it handed down on a plate to them.
If they had to go out on Building Sites like I have in the past 10 years not as a manual worker but part of the management team just to direct things in freezing cold blustering pis-ing it down weather they would know about it.
No chance of getting to 60 never mind 65 in those type of jobs.
And your second point yep consumables which are supposed to enrich ones life but a dammed good book would be far better and a fraction of the cost.
To me knowledge is far superior than material effects.
This age of the X factor, strictly, Gay chat hosts (nothing against Gays its supposed to be fashion) 3 for 2 at the supermarket etc etc is superficial carp to me.
cynic
- 07 Oct 2014 15:54
- 46999 of 81564
you and your bloody carp
don't you fish for anything else! :-)
2517GEORGE
- 07 Oct 2014 16:29
- 47000 of 81564
gf--- There are some on this thread who have been handed sweet f a, and have worked hard to achieve their goals.
2517
goldfinger
- 07 Oct 2014 16:43
- 47001 of 81564
True George me included. I had to go to school in wellingtons in the summer for 5 years my family were that poor. But my father was in full time work and had a good manual job as a pattern maker.
The point im trying to make is that their is one or two on this thread who havent had to scrape by and have no idea how hard it is for some of the poor especially today.
They associate them with SKY TV, Cigs, drinking beer and drugs which couldnt be further from the truth for most poor people. They listen to silly documentaries on TV and read right wing clap trap in the news papers.
cynic
- 07 Oct 2014 17:01
- 47002 of 81564
i wouldn't call pattern making manual, let alone unskilled
average pay nowadays in that role is £18/26,000 pa, presumably based well north of watford, so you'll get more for your money there
goldfinger
- 07 Oct 2014 17:18
- 47003 of 81564
Cant see what your posting cynic Ive had you filtered since yesterday morning along with your 2 partners Chris Carson and Doodelbug4.
hilary
- 07 Oct 2014 17:19
- 47004 of 81564
Actually, cyners, having watched my own children go through the education system in recent years, I think the standard of teaching has improved drastically since I rebelled against the nuns who taught me.
But, I do agree, exams have been dumbed down and the use of modules only makes things worse.
cynic
- 07 Oct 2014 17:22
- 47005 of 81564
i wasn't complaining about the teachers per se, but i certainly think there is a tendency to set pupil aspiration too low
MaxK
- 07 Oct 2014 17:32
- 47006 of 81564
And too many of them are useless, form ticking nonentities.
cynic
- 07 Oct 2014 17:35
- 47007 of 81564
to some extent, it's what the system demands
i think there are similar probs for docs and pharmacists
Haystack
- 07 Oct 2014 17:49
- 47008 of 81564
MaxK
- 07 Oct 2014 17:55
- 47009 of 81564
Isnt it too late for the Brutus solution?
Haystack
- 07 Oct 2014 17:58
- 47010 of 81564
Far too late unless Ed falls on his sword. More likely carries a pencil sharpener and a pocket full of pencils for his homework. It is back to the sixth form for him after the election.
Fred1new
- 07 Oct 2014 18:08
- 47011 of 81564
You are talking about your future MP.
Then Manuel will have his pension frozen and have to get a job as a pattern worker earning about £18,000 a year.
Should cover his meals out.
--------
Sorry, forgot, he has fish and chips with a mug of tea when he is out.
doodlebug4
- 07 Oct 2014 18:10
- 47012 of 81564
Perhaps a future MP Fred, but not a future PM!
Fred1new
- 07 Oct 2014 18:21
- 47013 of 81564
W/see!
MaxK
- 07 Oct 2014 19:50
- 47014 of 81564
If you had some saucy pictures of yourself or other half, would you post them on a public computer or would you keep them on your personal hard drive?
Jennifer Lawrence denounces nude photo hack as a 'sex crime'
Actor says websites are responsible and that the theft and online publication of photos are ‘a sexual violation’
Jessica Glenza in New York
theguardian.com, Tuesday 7 October 2014 17.47 BST
Oscar winner Jennifer Lawrence has called the theft and publication of nude photos of her a “sex crime” in the actor’s first public comments since dozens of nude celebrity photos werestolen by hackers.
“It is not a scandal. It is a sex crime,” Lawrence told Vanity Fair contributing editor Sam Kashner in an interview to promote new movie Serena. “It is a sexual violation. It’s disgusting.”
“The law needs to be changed, and we need to change. That’s why these websites are responsible. Just the fact that somebody can be sexually exploited and violated, and the first thought that crosses somebody’s mind is to make a profit from it. It’s so beyond me. I just can’t imagine being that detached from humanity. I can’t imagine being that thoughtless and careless and so empty inside.”
Nude photos of Lawrence were stolen from the actor’s Apple iCloud account and published by hackers on the website 4chan, along with naked photos of around 100 other female celebrities.
More stupid cow stuff here:
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/oct/07/jennifer-lawrence-nude-photo-hack-sex-crime