keith thomas
- 20 Apr 2004 17:06
will it ever recover to the 38p i paid for them??
SARAHA
- 05 Nov 2005 19:42
- 477 of 520
ARE THEY WORTH BUYING AT 7.38
katcenka
- 06 Nov 2005 17:26
- 478 of 520
Nope, not worth buying at all, and this is why
Sorry chaps, there will be no RNS re the watermark deal, I got a response to the email I sent on Friday... so it was all piss and wind... Knowing your a naught boy..
From : ray gibbs
Sent : Saturday, 5 November 2005 10:24:49 PM
To : "'JOJN P'"
Subject : RE: shareholder Urgent question re Watermark
| | | Inbox
Dear Sir,
Our announcement covered the financial aspects of the contract to appraise
the market of a matter that was deemed price sensitive. We were advised that
the agency agreement is a normal business matter and not as such an
announceable event. Obviously the receipt of future orders will be a matter
to consider advising the market so that our financial performance can be
reappraised in light of new information that may effect our future trading
and subsequently the share price.
Ray Gibbs
Group Managing Director
katcenka
- 07 Nov 2005 16:43
- 479 of 520
doom and gloom
moneyman
- 15 Nov 2005 21:41
- 480 of 520
Shame everyone is missing out on this ! What action today....is there news on the way ?
fletch61
- 26 Nov 2005 10:31
- 481 of 520
Did everyone see the tick up last trades Friday, more action Monday !!! worth looking at first thing.
Red Underwing
- 26 Nov 2005 18:57
- 482 of 520
Yes!
A very obvious late buying run, but not a huge sum involved! Quite concentrated after 16:00.
Lets hope it was meaningful!
Fly by Night
Red
Crazyfrog
- 26 Nov 2005 22:54
- 483 of 520
Looked at the trades for a few weeks, seems every friday there is a rally for shares and then they drop the price the following week, is this simply not another trap.
moneyman
- 30 Nov 2005 23:50
- 484 of 520
Look how cagey the MMs are ! Is news expected ? According to a poster on ADVFN there is a two day presentation to institutions taking place !
moneyman
- 07 Dec 2005 09:32
- 485 of 520
Interesting rise today. Is it the precursor to news ?
nkirkup
- 13 Dec 2005 12:23
- 486 of 520
Is this the end for ARX?
TheMaster
- 13 Dec 2005 12:34
- 487 of 520
Expect massive dilution with new shares offered at a discount 4p
BOOBOO
- 13 Dec 2005 12:47
- 488 of 520
Can you elaborate please TM?
moneyman
- 13 Dec 2005 12:52
- 489 of 520
LOL
There is a rumour of a placing. Question is at what price and for what purpose. Remember there was talk of a large non-ULD order.
BOOBOO
- 13 Dec 2005 13:42
- 490 of 520
Beginning to think I am the kiss of death.....I have waited ages to jump in here....thought it seemed like a good time....
proptrade
- 13 Dec 2005 22:47
- 491 of 520
perspective please people!
1. we all knew a fund raising was coming
2. this will NOT be at anything like 4p
3. firm now has excellent order flow and can now justify asking for working capital
4. my call is that they raise at between 6p and 7p and these rally to 20p in 3 months
5. once complete we will at last have certainty...35p again???
rgds
CP
stockdog
- 13 Dec 2005 23:22
- 492 of 520
nice thoughts proptrade - let's hope so.
sd
Red Underwing
- 13 Dec 2005 23:36
- 493 of 520
I hope you are correct proptrade.
I think the region of 5.5p is more likely.
Fly by Night
Red
Red Underwing
- 14 Dec 2005 16:32
- 494 of 520
I'm pleased I was unduly pessimistic concernimng the placing price.
Now announced as 6p for those who haven't seen it
That should place a floor under the SP. Lets hope the acquisitions bear the expected fruit!
http://www.moneyam.com/action/news/showArticle?id=1096875
http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/200512141416216669V.html
I liked this extract:- "In the second half of this year there has been a marked increase in interest and enquiries for the Aerobox ULD, it said."
But not the comment that some deliveries would be pushed through into 2006 because of changing delivery requirements from one customer!
Fly by Night
Red
proptrade
- 14 Dec 2005 22:08
- 495 of 520
perfect placement. please read my last post for what happens next!
hangon
- 16 Jan 2006 15:17
- 496 of 520
Isn't this a comany with two major drawbacks?-:-
1) one-product
2) one industry
I don't like single-product companies ... competition can destroy their game in one and unless they are "the best" they will have no experience to fall back on.
Working in one-industry is a real dumb move ... since any problem will be reflected throughout your customer-base. Furthermore, if orders pick-up there is a risk that you'll be overloaded and competitors will muscle-in ... never easily removed.
/
This company needs to ditch its "Aero" - name .... how about "Betterbx" (I don't like "box" either)...
-and needs to start looking at similar products (ie plastic cages) maybe the supermarkets, industrial carts and so on - that means more investment, but it will smooth out orders and reduce the risks associated with being dependant on a single -industry.
/They are at-risk over energy prices (affects plastic) and this is a worry - but they aren't alone and I suspect their competitors will face similar problems.
Javelin has put the case against this company very clearly.....I hope my contribution may point towards a cure. The sp is quite low, maybe a chance for value-investors, however, I'm unsure that airlines won't have difficulty selling even low-cost seats as World events appear to have dented the Public's desire to fly....and fuel-price rises means that, even Low-Cost, isn't anymore.
I don't hold Aerobox.