markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
chav
- 12 Oct 2010 08:05
- 4789 of 6492
If Rachel proves to be Oil charged then DES is worth a lot more than just Rachel as it will derisk a lot more targets and give punters a lot more confidence for future drills...3 of which are already funded....Rachel comes in dry then it works the other way, of course, however I don't think it's overpriced currrently.
required field
- 12 Oct 2010 08:12
- 4791 of 6492
I was hoping for a pullback to 120p.....just not going to happen, but I shall have to miss out on this because 173p is just ridiculous at this present moment.....
HARRYCAT
- 12 Oct 2010 08:24
- 4792 of 6492
Marky, I thought from all of your previous posts, that RKH was your well researched Eldorado with a long term 'hold' strategy and that DES was just a punt. Now you are saying that RKH has run it's course & DES is the new rainbow you are chasing??? I agree with most posters here that DES is overpriced & that a duster is going to trim the sp by 60-70%. That's very high risk with hard earned profit from your RKH holding.
chav
- 12 Oct 2010 08:24
- 4793 of 6492
Is RKH valued correctly marky?
Balerboy
- 12 Oct 2010 08:26
- 4794 of 6492
come off it rf, with 8-10 days to go .....a pull back???? you dithered and now you got to sit back and watch. Notice how some are changing their tune to what you've said all along.....even the ramper pp.,.
required field
- 12 Oct 2010 08:32
- 4795 of 6492
I don't mean a pullback now....I was hoping for a drop a few weeks ago....I'm also very much invested in a few others and it's the enormous risk of getting my fingers burnt now that's putting me off...hands up : I've badly mistimed any possible re-entry here....
cynic
- 12 Oct 2010 08:44
- 4797 of 6492
my position here is now that i can sleep easy in the event of another duster, but have a nice base if bacon comes home
dealerdear
- 12 Oct 2010 08:46
- 4798 of 6492
I'm slightly confused by the placing. Surely they haven't placed at 140p? if there is a chance that the sp will bomb to 80p or so. Unless there is another explanation, does this suggest that DES know something or, as I've seen happen before the sp rises dramatically before news so that the drop is only down to the placing price.
Proselenes
- 12 Oct 2010 09:04
- 4799 of 6492
Look at the volumes.
Would suggest those who took the placing shares have been selling like mad of late....... and are still selling now locking in a 10% to 15% profit.
140p will represent no barrier to a down move should this be a bad well.
cynic
- 12 Oct 2010 09:15
- 4800 of 6492
probably not .... i'ld hazard a guess that those who were treated to the placing have some kind of lock-in too
cynic
- 12 Oct 2010 09:19
- 4802 of 6492
no marky, it was (should have been!) an easy decision where your brain overruled your stomach!
Time Traveller
- 12 Oct 2010 09:58
- 4803 of 6492
So now we know. It was Marky that caused the DES share price to fall as he offloaded a chunk of his shares. (;-))
chav
- 13 Oct 2010 08:09
- 4804 of 6492
Got some more DES this morning ...nice drop:-)
required field
- 13 Oct 2010 12:10
- 4805 of 6492
Twin peaks formation......a drop before drilling update ?...
required field
- 13 Oct 2010 12:17
- 4807 of 6492
Might just pull back now....next few days.....down to 130p or so....
HARRYCAT
- 13 Oct 2010 12:26
- 4808 of 6492
....but then it might not........