Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Referendum : to be in Europe or not to be ?, that is the question ! (REF)     

required field - 03 Feb 2016 10:00

Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....

Dil - 24 Aug 2016 09:07 - 4969 of 12628

Can't wait til the EU's new budget talks take place without Britain's huge subsidy. It'll be every man for himself and bollox to unity unless of course Germany agrees to stump up all of the missing cash (and that won't happen).

VICTIM - 24 Aug 2016 09:10 - 4970 of 12628

Yes the old lady in blue there doing more damage to Europe than Hitler , sounds daft but it is damage that is really going to be irreversible .

jimmy b - 24 Aug 2016 11:18 - 4971 of 12628

I just love it that we voted OUT ....

jimmy b - 24 Aug 2016 12:45 - 4972 of 12628

granny , Owen Smith , more to the point how thick must he be ? a huge number of Labour voters voted out ,does he think another referendum would win him an election ,and to think these morons want to run our country .

grannyboy - 24 Aug 2016 13:03 - 4973 of 12628

I to just love it that we voted out and don't have ANY voter remorse
whatsoever..

As to Owen Smith being thick...He's not thick just anti democratic, and
no different from the rest of the champagne socialist, at least Corbyn has
said that the people have spoken and the UK should LEAVE the EU.

cynic - 24 Aug 2016 13:19 - 4974 of 12628

you guys are hilarious

there are stupid ways of implementing "leave EU" like throwing all the toys out of the pram without properly thinking it through

and a more sensible approach to "leaving EU" wherein all aspects are properly considered and discussed - and with an end result with which no one is truly happy; ie a "good result"

Haystack - 24 Aug 2016 13:48 - 4975 of 12628

Thee is a growing appetite for Soft Brexit

jimmy b - 24 Aug 2016 13:56 - 4976 of 12628

With who Haystack ,you ?
if it doesn't happen the Tory party are in deep water mark my words ,just remember what i said in 3 years time you will see a shock to British politics .+

I actually don't think that's going to happen ,for the moment i'm going to trust May ,she sacked the little twit that is Osbourne in quite a cruel way that will do for starters .

cynic - 24 Aug 2016 14:05 - 4977 of 12628

my attitude and opinion has remained constant once i decide that "out" was the way i would vote

Haystack - 24 Aug 2016 14:18 - 4978 of 12628

With the City, some larger businesses and the EU.

2517GEORGE - 24 Aug 2016 14:28 - 4979 of 12628

Well you can't count the EU and what the 3 stooges are proposing shows that we were right to vote 'Leave' Whilst there are difficult times ahead they will be shown to be less difficult than if we voted to 'Remain'
2517

MaxK - 24 Aug 2016 14:50 - 4981 of 12628

Well Haystack, you know what you can do with your version of brexit!

Haystack - 24 Aug 2016 14:52 - 4982 of 12628

Not mine. I prefer a complete cut, but I am not convinced we will get it

cynic - 24 Aug 2016 15:01 - 4983 of 12628

does your definition of "a complete cut" mean severing all trading links with eu?

Haystack - 24 Aug 2016 15:13 - 4984 of 12628

No. That would be impossible. I would prefer to be treated as though we were not adjacent to EU, such as Australia and have us swallow tariffs if necessary to avoid other constraints.

cynic - 24 Aug 2016 15:17 - 4985 of 12628

so effectively ditch all preferential rates then as to get those would inevitably have certain strings attached
mind you, all goods sold into EU would have to comply with their regs anyway


any concerns over the potential loss of the City's influence and stature as the European commercial hub across the board?

MaxK - 24 Aug 2016 15:27 - 4986 of 12628

All goods sold anywhere have to conform to local standards, that's a non starter as an argument.

The city in all likelihood will depart these shores if the €uroloons get their way, so no point in including it in the pot.

However, everything else outside the above can be run to suit ourselves, and not be dictated to by Brussels.

cynic - 24 Aug 2016 15:31 - 4987 of 12628

am i correct in thinking that City-related services contribute about 20% of UK GDP?
if that is about right right (or even too low) you can't just ignore its loss!

MaxK - 24 Aug 2016 15:37 - 4988 of 12628

Yes, a big chunk of gdp.

And how long do you think we will hang on to it if the €uroloons get their way?
Register now or login to post to this thread.