goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 17:06
- 52274 of 81564
Hey Cyners lad, get up to date, its all here........
your on the wrong track bud.........
Your mates were wrong, HMRC won on the timing and PRESS issue.............
http://www.investorcentral.co.uk/news
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 17:09
- 52275 of 81564
MOST OF THE DEFENDANTS HAVE ALREADY PAID THERE TAXES DUE.
GARY BARLOW CERTAINLY AS.
cynic
- 05 Dec 2014 17:26
- 52276 of 81564
thanks old chap, but in fact that link gives no news later than what i posted
that defendants have paid up is no admission of any wrong-doing at all, but if this case is going to drag on and on and on and on as seems likely, then i'ld guess it becomes a matter of risk/reward for the defendants
i don't know what happens to the money already paid if HMRC ends up losing, but my guess is that it'll be "hard luck old chap"
from what little i have read, Ingenious backed a good number of films which achieved box office success ..... is that relevant to the issue? ..... i really don't know, but at least it shows the core investment biz was not just a sham
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 17:44
- 52277 of 81564
Good point Cyners but I always look upon tax as a MORAL issue.
The cheats have been caught and have payed back.
Thats fine with me.
cynic
- 05 Dec 2014 17:51
- 52278 of 81564
they're not cheats you tosspot :-)
unless i'm much mistaken, Ingenious was set up probably 10 years ago with guidance from HMRC and also the encouragement of gov't that wanted to promote investment in films .... the inducement for this was assorted tax breaks
as for tax being a moral issue ....... !!!!!
the tax man has no morals at all ...... just as you are more than happy to take what tax breaks and benefits you feel are yours as of right, so this case as far as i can see, is actually little different
it may be that the law lords, for whatever reason will take a different view, but clearly it is a very unclear situation that is likely to be appealed a few times over
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 17:58
- 52279 of 81564
They are cheats and the tax man is a cheat aswel in your personal case.
But unfortunately in society we have certain laws which we have to stick to or society would break down.
Now stop gobbing and get my tea in the oven.
MaxK
- 05 Dec 2014 18:07
- 52280 of 81564
Why do folk oop north call dinner, tea?
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 18:10
- 52281 of 81564
Because we are poor.
We dont have the means to afford both a late tea and an evening dinner.
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 18:12
- 52282 of 81564
Or is it an High tea???????
Haystack
- 05 Dec 2014 18:12
- 52283 of 81564
The ones who have paid will likely appeal if the case goes against HMRC and claim interest for the intervening period as is their right. It looks like HMRC are wrong in this case and hopefully will get a bloody nose.
MaxK
- 05 Dec 2014 18:14
- 52284 of 81564
lol gf :-)
Haystack
- 05 Dec 2014 18:16
- 52285 of 81564
Actually, it would be a high tea, not an high tea!
Haystack
- 05 Dec 2014 18:17
- 52286 of 81564
Where is the grammar police when we need him.
Come back Kayak!
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 18:18
- 52287 of 81564
Stop talking sh-te Hays.
It will be at least 2020 before this is sorted.
Do you really think the government of the day will accept a defeat.
Dream on man.
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 18:19
- 52288 of 81564
In your case Hays does it matter, your high ALL DAY.
Snorter Osbourne comes to mind.
cynic
- 05 Dec 2014 18:20
- 52289 of 81564
sticky - you know a bit more than the rest of us about the workings of HMRC ..... will those who have paid up be reimbursed if the case goes against HMRC, or will they have had to sign away all rights?
no argument about the legal obligation to pay taxes - render unto Caesar etc etc - but in this particular case, it is (suddenly?) not clear at all who has God on their side
cynic
- 05 Dec 2014 18:21
- 52290 of 81564
well hays, it's assuredly an historical novel, so why would an high tea be a grammatical inexactitude, for both have aspirated aitches?
goldfinger
- 05 Dec 2014 18:25
- 52291 of 81564
They will get paid back with the official inflation rate for the year at the end of Sept in each year of indebtedness.
Fred1new
- 05 Dec 2014 18:36
- 52293 of 81564
Max,
Tea!
Possibly, when the morning shifts from pits or heavy industries, got home and also, the food was eaten with tea.
It was a cooked meal at the end of the working day.
Followed, by a light supper.
======
High tea from distant memory was a cooked light meal tea of some form.
--------
Could be wrong, but it was part of my childhood.