Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

i'ld much rather have dennis skinner as my mp than george galloway

galloway always struck me as being untrustworthy and in the pay of those who "wished mischief" on this country

Napoleon,

Do you mean Israel or the French?

No, never!

Milly will trash Camoron in the one off dont forget he cant lie through his teeth or give false figures like in PMqs or the presenter will pull him up.

Milly will win the election after that debate and Lynton Crosby is seething.

Hes thinking of leaving Milly with a empty chair hes that frightened the Fat Dave will cock it up.

I bet Hays is shittting aswel. He knows Milly as the beating of him on a platform debate.

One hell of a difference than being in the commons where he as backing for his lies.

sure as hell israel wouldn't back galloway, and not even sure that the french would

It is the difference between a nice guy Miliband and a s called Cameron.


(I wish Ed had spelt his name with two l.s, keep on having to re-enter his name.)

fred - you're making even less sense than usual

Cameron will crush Miliband as he does at PMQs. Miliband has his questions written for him. When he speaks off the cuff, he goes to pieces as he did at the party conference when he forgot to mention all the key topics.

He does not perform well under pressure. It won't be difficult to make him look like a buffoon. It will be a Prime Minister vs an awkward sixth former.

Napp,

Which part.

Milliband against Miliband!

LOL LOL LOL LOL....... WHAT........

Milly will just get him worked up and he'l go all red in the face and blow up and lose it c ompletly.

Camoron is useless at public speaking without autocue or notes.

Use your loaf Hays. .

I would have voted for the war in Iraq and still would. The problem was not the war, but the lack of a post war plan. I didn't believe the WMD argument at the time.

Cameron is a far better public speaker than Miliband. Miliband gets slammed by the pundits after every speech. Even the left wing press attack his performances. His complete lack of charisma will be a disaster on TV.

So Haystack, if you didn't believe the WMD story then what justification have you for the war?

Millibandus nice guy? Ask his brother! Back stabbing barsteward would be polite as just one answer!

If Cameron succeeds, then there will be two buffoons on the stage and if you are watching, there will be three.

Fred2old and the other option is to have Miliband as PM and either Sturgeon or Salmond as deputy and Ed Balls, who can't even count up to three, as Chancellor.

Db 3 1/2,

I don't think there was a legal justification for that "War".

Hussain was a nasty B. so is Assad, as are many others.

But we don't go to war with them.

Justifications for wars are like excuses for forgetting your homework. No one with any sense believes them. Sadam needed to go. He would have had WMDs at a later date and it was opportune to stop him. Had the coalition not backed off at the end of the first Gulf war then it would have been tidied a lot better. The second Gulf war left a mess.

Based on Hay's opinion, I wonder if we could justify similar actions on Hays.

It certainly might be tidier without him!

8-)

No place to hide ...




UK voters: ‘Cameron running scared of TV debates’

Public want leaders’ debates to go ahead, shows ICM poll for Guardian, which is bidding to host event with YouTube and Telegraph



Tom Clark

The Guardian, Friday 23 January 2015 16.40 GMT



L to R: David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Gordon Brown during a leaders' debate in the 2010 election campaign. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA


Tom Clark

Britain’s voters are determined that the pre-election leaders’ debates should go ahead – and would favour serious consequences for leaders who duck out of them.

That is the message of an ICM poll commissioned by the Guardian as part of its joint bid, with YouTube and the Telegraph, to stage one of the debates.

The research comes as the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky announced revised proposals for TV election debates and said they would “empty chair” party leaders who refused to take part.



More: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/23/uk-voters-back-serious-consequences-election-debate-no-shows