Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Haystack - 23 Jan 2015 17:41 - 55668 of 81564

Cameron is a far better public speaker than Miliband. Miliband gets slammed by the pundits after every speech. Even the left wing press attack his performances. His complete lack of charisma will be a disaster on TV.

doodlebug4 - 23 Jan 2015 17:41 - 55669 of 81564

So Haystack, if you didn't believe the WMD story then what justification have you for the war?

Chris Carson - 23 Jan 2015 17:41 - 55670 of 81564

Millibandus nice guy? Ask his brother! Back stabbing barsteward would be polite as just one answer!

Fred1new - 23 Jan 2015 17:41 - 55671 of 81564

If Cameron succeeds, then there will be two buffoons on the stage and if you are watching, there will be three.

doodlebug4 - 23 Jan 2015 17:45 - 55672 of 81564

Fred2old and the other option is to have Miliband as PM and either Sturgeon or Salmond as deputy and Ed Balls, who can't even count up to three, as Chancellor.

Fred1new - 23 Jan 2015 17:45 - 55673 of 81564

Db 3 1/2,

I don't think there was a legal justification for that "War".

Hussain was a nasty B. so is Assad, as are many others.

But we don't go to war with them.



Haystack - 23 Jan 2015 17:45 - 55674 of 81564

Justifications for wars are like excuses for forgetting your homework. No one with any sense believes them. Sadam needed to go. He would have had WMDs at a later date and it was opportune to stop him. Had the coalition not backed off at the end of the first Gulf war then it would have been tidied a lot better. The second Gulf war left a mess.

Fred1new - 23 Jan 2015 17:50 - 55675 of 81564

Based on Hay's opinion, I wonder if we could justify similar actions on Hays.

It certainly might be tidier without him!

8-)

MaxK - 23 Jan 2015 18:49 - 55676 of 81564

No place to hide ...




UK voters: ‘Cameron running scared of TV debates’

Public want leaders’ debates to go ahead, shows ICM poll for Guardian, which is bidding to host event with YouTube and Telegraph



Tom Clark

The Guardian, Friday 23 January 2015 16.40 GMT



L to R: David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Gordon Brown during a leaders' debate in the 2010 election campaign. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA


Tom Clark

Britain’s voters are determined that the pre-election leaders’ debates should go ahead – and would favour serious consequences for leaders who duck out of them.

That is the message of an ICM poll commissioned by the Guardian as part of its joint bid, with YouTube and the Telegraph, to stage one of the debates.

The research comes as the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky announced revised proposals for TV election debates and said they would “empty chair” party leaders who refused to take part.



More: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/23/uk-voters-back-serious-consequences-election-debate-no-shows

Haystack - 23 Jan 2015 19:19 - 55677 of 81564

A debate with 7, 8 ,9 or 10 (if the Irish parties are present) will be a farce. No one will remember who said what or who won. The SNP will argue with everyone. Any Irish parties will argue with each other. The Greens will try and upstage Labour. Farage will attack SNP, Labour and Conservatives. Labour will attack UKIP, Libs and Conservatives. Clegg will try and distance himself from the coalition and have no policies. Clegg is the biggest loser as he has missed his three handed grandstand chance.

Fred1new - 23 Jan 2015 19:49 - 55678 of 81564

Haze,

Not all the viewers will be as gaga as you and they will enjoy Cameron being torn apart!

It will be even better if Cameron doesn't turn up.

I say send Cynic to replace him!

doodlebug4 - 23 Jan 2015 20:04 - 55679 of 81564

Cameron has already won the first debate!

MaxK - 23 Jan 2015 20:13 - 55680 of 81564

eh?

doodlebug4 - 23 Jan 2015 20:20 - 55681 of 81564

He's already won his debate on who should be invited to take part in the television circus.The whole issue has developed into an utter farce. Galloway is now threatening to sue if he is excluded.

MaxK - 23 Jan 2015 20:27 - 55682 of 81564

Ah, ok.

So he's killed the debate is more like it. (or tried to)

Wont work, there's any number of ways of narrowing it down.

doodlebug4 - 23 Jan 2015 20:34 - 55683 of 81564

Cameron and Miliband?

MaxK - 23 Jan 2015 20:37 - 55684 of 81564

For instance.

Tele peeps can say its only for national sized parties, ie, you must be fielding more than say 300 candidates, that gets rid of the small fry leaving the big orgs to fight it out....it also gets rid of wee-eck lol

Haystack - 23 Jan 2015 20:41 - 55685 of 81564

There is going to be one Cameron / Miliband debate. The other ones will be a comedy program. Only worth watching for the amusement factor. I can't wait for Nicola Sturgeon to take Farage apart.

Haystack - 23 Jan 2015 20:42 - 55686 of 81564

The TV companies have already agreed to the 7 way debate.

Fred1new - 23 Jan 2015 20:44 - 55687 of 81564

Haze,

You seem to be having a personality split!
Register now or login to post to this thread.